Header Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Exon capture and RNA-seq

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse

SEQanswers June Challenge Has Begun!

The competition has begun! We're giving away a $50 Amazon gift card to the member who answers the most questions on our site during the month. We want to encourage our community members to share their knowledge and help each other out by answering questions related to sequencing technologies, genomics, and bioinformatics. The competition is open to all members of the site, and the winner will be announced at the beginning of July. Best of luck!

For a list of the official rules, visit (https://www.seqanswers.com/forum/sit...wledge-and-win)
See more
See less
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Exon capture and RNA-seq

    Apologies if this has been covered before but I am new to this great forum.

    I want to combine exon capture which I have done on DNA with RNA seq.

    If anyone can point me to any pertinent literature or make any constructive comments, these would be welcomed.

  • #2
    Maybe you could first explain to us why you would want to do this? It is a rather unusual suggestion, after all.

    Comment


    • #3
      Pathway specific RNA-Seq

      I am just wanting to look at certain pathways,
      This should then bring the cost persample down

      Comment


      • #4
        If, by "exon capture", you mean capturing all exons, you can get this easier by just pulling out polyadenylated RNA. This is what is usually done.

        Capture adds all the usual biases one knows from microarrays, and hence, RNA-Seq after capture will only give you what you would have gotten easier and cheaper with expression microarrays, unless you want to study sequence changes (RNA-editing, coding SNPs, or the like).

        If you are only interested in a few genes, would not qPCR (analysed e.g. with HTqPCR package) or NanoStrings be cheaper, simpler and more accurate than capture and HTS?

        Comment


        • #5
          We are interested in the range of 200-500 genes.

          Because of their restricted dynamic range, arrays are not suitable.

          We have a limited amount of material, which precludes RT-qPCR.

          Nanostring would be appropriate but we do not have access to this methodology.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by seqadmin, 06-01-2023, 08:56 PM
          0 responses
          10 views
          0 likes
          Last Post seqadmin  
          Started by seqadmin, 06-01-2023, 07:33 AM
          0 responses
          9 views
          0 likes
          Last Post seqadmin  
          Started by seqadmin, 05-31-2023, 07:50 AM
          0 responses
          6 views
          0 likes
          Last Post seqadmin  
          Started by seqadmin, 05-26-2023, 09:22 AM
          0 responses
          11 views
          0 likes
          Last Post seqadmin  
          Working...
          X