Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • malachig
    replied
    RNA-Seq can certainly be used to quantify transcripts and compare between tissues. If your RNA is of high quality and your libraries are sequenced to sufficient depth the outcome is likely to be more reliable and less noisy than microarrays. I worked with microarrays for several years and with RNA-Seq for the last two years. Initially RNA-Seq has some growing pains but in my opinion it now beats microarrays hands down. It does not rely on prior knowledge of gene annotations and it has a better signal-to-noise ratio, sensitivity and specificity (if you have enough library depth). Furthermore, in our validations of expression and differential expression estimates from RNA-Seq we found the results to be highly comparable to qPCR.

    Leave a comment:


  • spenthil
    replied
    I am no way qualified to answer this question, but can point you to two papers that I have been meaning to read that do cover this:



    Pay particular attention to the idea of "5' bias" and random priming bias - which I think are the biggest problems with current techniques. Of particular note is a comment in the nature paper:
    RNA fragmentation before copying would also be expected to greatly reduce 5' bias. This protocol gave better overall uniformity than protocols without RNA fragmentation (Supplementary Fig. 1), although some residual and reproducible nonuniformity clearly persists for randomly primed substrates that was not observed in other kinds of Illumina sequencing substrates handled simultaneously, such as chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIPSeq) samples

    Leave a comment:


  • shazzle
    started a topic Quantifying trascript levels using RNA-seq

    Quantifying trascript levels using RNA-seq

    Hi guys,

    I thought of asking this:

    1. Can we get sequencing data of a certain mrna from RNA-seq, say from heart and muscle, and use it to quantify and make conclusion about transcript levels in heart and muscle? Is it conclusive, i mean, wouldnt there be noise to take care of and some statistics to normalise the levels of capture on the mrna?

    2. If 1. is possible, can we extend the quantification theory to ChIP-seq ie. measuring TF levels in cancer/non-cancer groups?

    Thanks!

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • seqadmin
    Strategies for Sequencing Challenging Samples
    by seqadmin


    Despite advancements in sequencing platforms and related sample preparation technologies, certain sample types continue to present significant challenges that can compromise sequencing results. Pedro Echave, Senior Manager of the Global Business Segment at Revvity, explained that the success of a sequencing experiment ultimately depends on the amount and integrity of the nucleic acid template (RNA or DNA) obtained from a sample. “The better the quality of the nucleic acid isolated...
    03-22-2024, 06:39 AM
  • seqadmin
    Techniques and Challenges in Conservation Genomics
    by seqadmin



    The field of conservation genomics centers on applying genomics technologies in support of conservation efforts and the preservation of biodiversity. This article features interviews with two researchers who showcase their innovative work and highlight the current state and future of conservation genomics.

    Avian Conservation
    Matthew DeSaix, a recent doctoral graduate from Kristen Ruegg’s lab at The University of Colorado, shared that most of his research...
    03-08-2024, 10:41 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by seqadmin, 03-27-2024, 06:37 PM
0 responses
12 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 03-27-2024, 06:07 PM
0 responses
11 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 03-22-2024, 10:03 AM
0 responses
53 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 03-21-2024, 07:32 AM
0 responses
68 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Working...
X