Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Matt.Ralston
    replied
    Updated link to genohub's guide: https://genohub.com/next-generation-...e/#replication

    Leave a comment:


  • zatoichi888
    replied
    Originally posted by Genohub View Post
    I recommend pooling all your samples together and spreading them across all your sequencing lanes. We've written a bit about Replication, Randomization and Multiplexing in our sequencing guide.

    - Genohub
    thank you very much! very helpful!

    Leave a comment:


  • Genohub
    replied
    Coverage for Chip-Seq

    Yes, ChIP samples typically need higher coverage, take a look at our recommended coverage table. We also have a reference in there to the Encode Guidelines. To calculate the "amount" or units of sequencing you'll need based on coverage or numbers of reads, go to this project page and click on either:
    • Minimum number of reads per sample
    • Minimum coverage per sample


    In your case, click on coverage, enter 100 (for 100x) and your haploid genome size. This will show you how many sequencing units (e.g. lanes) you need to meet your goal. The calculation assumes you want even sequencing coverage across all samples.

    - Genohub
    Last edited by Genohub; 05-07-2014, 05:57 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • leekb
    replied
    Originally posted by Genohub View Post
    I recommend pooling all your samples together and spreading them across all your sequencing lanes. We've written a bit about Replication, Randomization and Multiplexing in our sequencing guide.

    - Genohub
    Yes I'm facing the same question too. But mine is ChIP-Seq samples, I think ChIP input library need more reads than others IP libraries? In terms of sequencing depth and genome coverage?

    Leave a comment:


  • Genohub
    replied
    multiplexing samples together for best statistical power

    I recommend pooling all your samples together and spreading them across all your sequencing lanes. We've written a bit about Replication, Randomization and Multiplexing in our sequencing guide.

    - Genohub
    Last edited by Genohub; 05-07-2014, 05:58 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • multiplexing 16 samples together ran on 4 lanes or multiplexing 4 samples per lane?

    I have 16 samples and would like to multiplexing these samples. There are two ways to do this: multiplexing 16 samples all together and put onto 4 lanes; multiplexing only 4 samples and therefore using 4 lanes. I personally prefer the first choice because there are some controls and biological duplicate in these 16 samples and this way lane to lane difference can be eliminated. But from statistics point of view, I don't know if these two ways of multiplexing would have different statistics power. Can experts here please give me some suggestions about this? Thank you very much!

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • seqadmin
    An Introduction to the Technologies Transforming Precision Medicine
    by seqadmin


    In recent years, precision medicine has become a major focus for researchers and healthcare professionals. This approach offers personalized treatment and wellness plans by utilizing insights from each person's unique biology and lifestyle to deliver more effective care. Its advancement relies on innovative technologies that enable a deeper understanding of individual variability. In a joint documentary with our colleagues at Biocompare, we examined the foundational principles of precision...
    01-27-2025, 07:46 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by seqadmin, Yesterday, 09:30 AM
0 responses
16 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 02-05-2025, 10:34 AM
0 responses
28 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 02-03-2025, 09:07 AM
0 responses
27 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 01-31-2025, 08:31 AM
0 responses
35 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Working...
X