I'm aware of the RNA ligase biases in small RNA / RNA-Seq. Have you seen any papers about T4 DNA Ligase bias in DNA-Seq applications. I don't think this has been looked at as carefully. If anyone has used 'in-line' adapter barcodes during ligation, they may be in a unique position to comment.
- Genohub
Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
-
Thanks a lot for the links Genohub!
I have the impression, the authors of this specific paper have completely forgotten about any base-specific biases of enzymes involved in end-repair, A-tailing, and ligation.
E.g. ligation bias:
Ligation Bias in Illumina Next-Generation DNA Libraries: Implications for Sequencing Ancient GenomesAncient DNA extracts consist of a mixture of endogenous molecules and contaminant DNA templates, often originating from environmental microbes. These two populations of templates exhibit different chemical characteristics, with the former showing depurination and cytosine deamination by-products, resulting from post-mortem DNA damage. Such chemical modifications can interfere with the molecular tools used for building second-generation DNA libraries, and limit our ability to fully characterize the true complexity of ancient DNA extracts. In this study, we first use fresh DNA extracts to demonstrate that library preparation based on adapter ligation at AT-overhangs are biased against DNA templates starting with thymine residues, contrarily to blunt-end adapter ligation. We observe the same bias on fresh DNA extracts sheared on Bioruptor, Covaris and nebulizers. This contradicts previous reports suggesting that this bias could originate from the methods used for shearing DNA. This also suggests that AT-overhang adapter ligation efficiency is affected in a sequence-dependent manner and results in an uneven representation of different genomic contexts. We then show how this bias could affect the base composition of ancient DNA libraries prepared following AT-overhang ligation, mainly by limiting the ability to ligate DNA templates starting with thymines and therefore deaminated cytosines. This results in particular nucleotide misincorporation damage patterns, deviating from the signature generally expected for authenticating ancient sequence data. Consequently, we show that models adequate for estimating post-mortem DNA damage levels must be robust to the molecular tools used for building ancient DNA libraries.
Originally posted by Genohub View PostAnother interesting paper on Non-random DNA fragmentation in next-generation sequencing: http://www.nature.com/srep/2014/1403...srep04532.html
- Genohub
Leave a comment:
-
Another interesting paper on Non-random DNA fragmentation in next-generation sequencing: http://www.nature.com/srep/2014/1403...srep04532.html
- Genohub
Leave a comment:
-
Interesting paper examines transcriptome reassembly and determines it is sensitive to RNA fragmentation technique. Concludes that Zn mediated fragmentation provides a better transcript ID compared to cleavage by RNase III: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science...46202313000789
I wonder if this has been tested with Mg.
- Genohub
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by kshazand View Postluc,
Ppl looked into sonicated DNA and it does have all sorts of damages, hence my question.
I would be interested in data related to this. Could you point me to them?
The Knierim et al paper touches mostly on outdated methods:
Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) technologies are gaining importance in the routine clinical diagnostic setting. It is thus desirable to simplify the workflow for high-throughput diagnostics. Fragmentation of DNA is a crucial step for preparation of template libraries and various methods are currently known. Here we evaluated the performance of nebulization, sonication and random enzymatic digestion of long-range PCR products on the results of NGS. All three methods produced high-quality sequencing libraries for the 454 platform. However, if long-range PCR products of different length were pooled equimolarly, sequence coverage drastically dropped for fragments below 3,000 bp. All three methods performed equally well with regard to overall sequence quality (PHRED) and read length. Enzymatic fragmentation showed highest consistency between three library preparations but performed slightly worse than sonication and nebulization with regard to insertions/deletions in the raw sequence reads. After filtering for homopolymer errors, enzymatic fragmentation performed best if compared to the results of classic Sanger sequencing. As the overall performance of all three methods was equal with only minor differences, a fragmentation method can be chosen solely according to lab facilities, feasibility and experimental design.
Leave a comment:
-
6 Methods to Fragment DNA or RNA for NGS
These are the 6 main methods used to fragment DNA or RNA for NGS: http://blog.genohub.com/fragmentatio...-library-prep/
I'd be interested to see if there have been any detailed studies comparing the bias introduced by each of these.
- Genohub
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by luc View PostThe transposase protocols (nextera et al.) are the other alternative, of course also with some biases.
In general I guess/assume sonication will not introduce any significant biases ( I do not know if anybody has looked at it); at least not to a degree that they will not be trumped by biases of the required downstream enzymatic processes. If you can create your libraries PCR-free after sonication you should have very few worries.
Ppl looked into sonicated DNA and it does have all sorts of damages, hence my question.
Leave a comment:
-
kshazand,
Fragmentase is enzyme based but does not use restriction enzyme.
Leave a comment:
-
The transposase protocols (nextera et al.) are the other alternative, of course also with some biases.
In general I guess/assume sonication will not introduce any significant biases ( I do not know if anybody has looked at it); at least not to a degree that they will not be trumped by biases of the required downstream enzymatic processes. If you can create your libraries PCR-free after sonication you should have very few worries.
Originally posted by kshazand View PostYes thank you, I know Fragmentase, but since it is mainly based on restriction enzymes, the output has some bias. What other "many alternatives" are you refering to?
Leave a comment:
-
Yes thank you, I know Fragmentase, but since it is mainly based on restriction enzymes, the output has some bias. What other "many alternatives" are you refering to?
Leave a comment:
-
DNA fragmentation methods
Hi all,
Different physical damages are made to DNA during sonication. Yet, we all use Covaris and other similar sonicators for library prep.
I would like to know how many of my colleagues have observed or even looked at the DNA state and what you think of potential alternatives to shearing.
KamranTags: None
Latest Articles
Collapse
-
by seqadmin
Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) do not code for proteins but play important roles in numerous cellular processes including gene silencing, developmental pathways, and more. There are numerous types including microRNA (miRNA), long ncRNA (lncRNA), circular RNA (circRNA), and more. In this article, we discuss innovative ncRNA research and explore recent technological advancements that improve the study of ncRNAs.
Nobel Prize for MicroRNA Discovery
This week,...-
Channel: Articles
Yesterday, 08:07 AM -
-
by seqadmin
Metagenomics has improved the way researchers study microorganisms across diverse environments. Historically, studying microorganisms relied on culturing them in the lab, a method that limits the investigation of many species since most are unculturable1. Metagenomics overcomes these issues by allowing the study of microorganisms regardless of their ability to be cultured or the environments they inhabit. Over time, the field has evolved, especially with the advent...-
Channel: Articles
09-23-2024, 06:35 AM -
-
by seqadmin
During the COVID-19 pandemic, scientists observed that while some individuals experienced severe illness when infected with SARS-CoV-2, others were barely affected. These disparities left researchers and clinicians wondering what causes the wide variations in response to viral infections and what role genetics plays.
Jean-Laurent Casanova, M.D., Ph.D., Professor at Rockefeller University, is a leading expert in this crossover between genetics and infectious...-
Channel: Articles
09-09-2024, 10:59 AM -
ad_right_rmr
Collapse
News
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by seqadmin, 10-02-2024, 04:51 AM
|
0 responses
95 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
10-02-2024, 04:51 AM
|
||
Started by seqadmin, 10-01-2024, 07:10 AM
|
0 responses
106 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
10-01-2024, 07:10 AM
|
||
Started by seqadmin, 09-30-2024, 08:33 AM
|
1 response
104 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by EmiTom
Yesterday, 06:46 AM
|
||
Started by seqadmin, 09-26-2024, 12:57 PM
|
0 responses
20 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
09-26-2024, 12:57 PM
|
Leave a comment: