Hi,
so this is probably going to be a very naive question, but here goes anyway:
I have just started using cufflinks - the dataset is single-end reads from the HiSeq2000 platform with a length of 100bp (105 if you count the adapter, which has already been removed).
I noticed a dramatic difference in FPKM value estimates between the 'default settings' for fragment length man (-m) and standard length deviation (-s). Apparently, cufflinks is not able to figure out the correct values from the data. But what has to go in there, exactly? And what program would be best suited to give me those estimates? I used the Picard toolbox to get mean fragment length (100, surprise surprise) - but standard deviation is not determined there.
Also, while I would guess that 100 is the value to put in, I used -q 15 in the bwa assembly, which performed quite a bit if soft clipping on some reads. Does that factor in in any way?
Thanks for any helpful comments!
/Marc
so this is probably going to be a very naive question, but here goes anyway:
I have just started using cufflinks - the dataset is single-end reads from the HiSeq2000 platform with a length of 100bp (105 if you count the adapter, which has already been removed).
I noticed a dramatic difference in FPKM value estimates between the 'default settings' for fragment length man (-m) and standard length deviation (-s). Apparently, cufflinks is not able to figure out the correct values from the data. But what has to go in there, exactly? And what program would be best suited to give me those estimates? I used the Picard toolbox to get mean fragment length (100, surprise surprise) - but standard deviation is not determined there.
Also, while I would guess that 100 is the value to put in, I used -q 15 in the bwa assembly, which performed quite a bit if soft clipping on some reads. Does that factor in in any way?
Thanks for any helpful comments!
/Marc
Comment