Tophat fusion does not produce desired fusions?

[jp.]

Hi there
I am running tophat-fusion with mouse samples and like to ask few things:
1. there is no difference if I use --non-human option ? My samples are mm10
2. Is there any other option which I must add (other than default)?
3. BLAST Database error: No alias or index file found for nucleotide database [blast/nt] in search path. However, I exported PATH but still the error..
4. I have downloaded blast:
1. ncbi-blast-2.2.28+
2. extracted est_mouse.tar.gz mouse_genomic_transcript.tar.gz within ncbi-blast-2.2.28+/ and ncbi-blast-2.2.28+/bin
3. I am not sure about other_genomic* and nt* ?
I used and exported PATH=$PATH:bowtie1, tophat2, blast, samtools
Thank you

What flags did you use to run tophat-fusion-post? Did you use the --non-human flag?

-Dinesh

[Naira]

Hi himanshu04
Hi Tankman,


I have got the same mistake as you:

Meaning that in the MCF7 sample data, there are
"0 fusions are output in ./tophatfusion_out/potential_fusion.txt"

Did you manage to find a solution?

Best,
Naïra

[tankman]

tophat-fusion-post

Hi Tankman,
I did manage to get it working. What was the directory structure you used for the tophat post fusion?. Also, when running the script, did you run it in the top_dir ?.
Thanks,
HImanshu

Hi Himanshu,

Wondering if you managed to take a look at my post of the commands I used to try and replicate their MCF example for tophat-fusion-post. I'm really trying to get this to work.

thanks a lot,
tm

[tankman]

tophat-fusion-post directory structure

Hi Himanshu,

Thanks a lot for answering. Here's my directory structure and some other info. THanks!

I'm positive it's failing at the filtration step since it doesn't even BLAST anything.


[tankmanb01@node2-4 tophat]$ find tophat_* -name "run.log" -exec head -1 {} \;
/packages/tophat/2.0.4/bin/tophat -p 64 -o tophat/tophat_KPL_final --fusion-search --keep-fasta-order --bowtie1 --no-coverage-search -r 0 --mate-std-dev 80 --fusion-min-dist 100000 --fusion-anchor-length 13 --fusion-ignore-chromosomes chrM index/hg19 SRR064287_1.fastq
SRR064287_2.fastq
/packages/tophat/2.0.4/bin/tophat -p 64 -o tophat/tophat_MCF7_final2 --fusion-search --keep-fasta-order --bowtie1 --no-coverage-search -r 0 --mate-std-dev 80 --fusion-min-dist 100000 --fusion-anchor-length 13 --fusion-ignore-chromosomes chrM index/hg19 SRR064286_1.fastq
SRR064286_2.fastq
/packages/tophat/2.0.4/bin/tophat -p 45 -o tophat/tophat_SKBR_final2 --fusion-search --keep-fasta-order --bowtie1 --no-coverage-search -r 50 --mate-std-dev 80 --fusion-min-dist 100000 --fusion-anchor-length 13 --fusion-ignore-chromosomes chrM index/hg19 SKBR3_mix_1.fastq
SKBR3_mix_2.fastq
[tankmanb01@node2-4 tophat]$ module list
Currently Loaded Modulefiles:
1) modules 3) /gcc/4.6.3(default) 5) /python/2.7.2(default) 7) /tophat/2.0.4 9) /bowtie/0.12.7
2) 3.2.9 4) /CPAN/bioperl/1.6.901 6) /boost/1.49.0-gcc4.6-python272 8) /blast/2.2.26 10) /samtools/0.1.18
[tankmanb01@node2-4 tophat]$
[tankmanb01@node2-4 tophat]$ ls -lrt
total 672
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 tankmanb01 tankmanb01a 65 Sep 16 20:14 blast -> /scratch/tankmanb01/projects/RNA_Cholangiocarcinoma/AN/tophat/blast
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 tankmanb01 tankmanb01a 71 Sep 16 20:14 refGene.txt -> /scratch/tankmanb01/projects/RNA_Cholangiocarcinoma/AN/tophat/refGene.txt
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 tankmanb01 tankmanb01a 71 Sep 16 20:14 ensGene.txt -> /scratch/tankmanb01/projects/RNA_Cholangiocarcinoma/AN/tophat/ensGene.txt
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 tankmanb01 tankmanb01a 63 Sep 16 20:14 mcl -> /scratch/tankmanb01/projects/RNA_Cholangiocarcinoma/AN/tophat/mcl
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 tankmanb01 tankmanb01a 65 Sep 16 20:14 index -> /scratch/tankmanb01/projects/RNA_Cholangiocarcinoma/AN/tophat/index
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 tankmanb01 tankmanb01a 5 Sep 16 20:23 blast_human -> blast
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 tankmanb01 tankmanb01a 79424 Sep 17 07:55 tophat-fusion-post_original
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 tankmanb01 tankmanb01a 78 Sep 17 07:57 tophat-fusion-post -> /scratch/tankmanb01/projects/RNA_Cholangiocarcinoma/AN/tophat/tophat-fusion-post
-rwxrwxr-x. 1 tankmanb01 tankmanb01a 80027 Sep 24 10:44 tophat-fusion-post_altered
drwxrwxr-x. 3 tankmanb01 tankmanb01a 32768 Sep 27 13:41 tophat_MCF7_final2
drwxrwxr-x. 4 tankmanb01 tankmanb01a 32768 Sep 27 13:47 tophat_KPL_final
drwxrwxr-x. 10 tankmanb01 tankmanb01a 32768 Sep 27 13:51 misc
drwxrwxr-x. 10 tankmanb01 tankmanb01a 32768 Sep 27 14:32 misc2
drwxrwxr-x. 6 tankmanb01 tankmanb01a 32768 Sep 27 14:52 test_fusion
drwxrwxr-x. 3 tankmanb01 tankmanb01a 32768 Sep 28 15:44 tophat_SKBR_final2
drwxrwxr-x. 7 tankmanb01 tankmanb01a 32768 Oct 1 09:44 tophatfusion_out
-rw-rw-r--. 1 tankmanb01 tankmanb01a 1373 Oct 1 09:45 check
[tankmanb01@node2-4 tophat]$
[tankmanb01@node2-4 tophat]$ tophat-fusion-post --num-fusion-reads 1 --num-fusion-pairs 2 --num-fusion-both 5 index/hg19
[Mon Oct 1 09:43:51 2012] Beginning TopHat-Fusion post-processing run (v2.0.4)
-----------------------------------------------
[Mon Oct 1 09:43:51 2012] Extracting 23-mer around fusions and mapping them using Bowtie
samples updated
[Mon Oct 1 09:44:43 2012] Filtering fusions
Processing: tophat_MCF7_final2/fusions.out
Processing: tophat_SKBR_final2/fusions.out
0 fusions are output in ./tophatfusion_out/potential_fusion.txt
[Mon Oct 1 09:44:55 2012] Blasting 50-mers around fusions
[Mon Oct 1 09:44:55 2012] Generating read distributions around fusions
[Mon Oct 1 09:44:55 2012] Reporting final fusion candidates in html format
num of fusions: 0
-----------------------------------------------
[Mon Oct 1 09:44:55 2012] Run complete [00:01:03 elapsed]
[tankmanb01@node2-4 tophat]$ tophat-fusion-post --num-fusion-reads 1 --num-fusion-pairs 2 --num-fusion-both 5 CLOWN
[Mon Oct 1 09:46:37 2012] Beginning TopHat-Fusion post-processing run (v2.0.4)
-----------------------------------------------
[Mon Oct 1 09:46:37 2012] Extracting 23-mer around fusions and mapping them using Bowtie
[Mon Oct 1 09:46:37 2012] Filtering fusions
Processing: tophat_MCF7_final2/fusions.out
Processing: tophat_SKBR_final2/fusions.out
0 fusions are output in ./tophatfusion_out/potential_fusion.txt
[Mon Oct 1 09:46:46 2012] Blasting 50-mers around fusions
[Mon Oct 1 09:46:46 2012] Generating read distributions around fusions
[Mon Oct 1 09:46:46 2012] Reporting final fusion candidates in html format
num of fusions: 0
-----------------------------------------------
[Mon Oct 1 09:46:46 2012] Run complete [00:00:09 elapsed]
[tankmanb01@node2-4 tophat]$

[himanshu04]

Hi Tankman,
I did manage to get it working. What was the directory structure you used for the tophat post fusion?. Also, when running the script, did you run it in the top_dir ?.
Thanks,
HImanshu

[tankman]

help with tophat-fusion-post

Hi Dinesh and Himanshu,

It seems you have tophat-fusion-post working, something I haven't yet managed to accomplish based on their MCF7 example. Have you gotten their example to work? My runs of tophat-fusion-post consistently yield no fusions even though the fusions.out results from the tophat alignment clearly have candidates -- I've complied with the directory structure, etc. requirements and have searched similar threads with no luck. I would appreciate any help!

thanks,
t

[himanshu04]

Yes, That is true. I have tried fusionseq but was not successful. I will be trying to use DeFuse in some time if this does not work Completely. Have you tried anything else yet?.

[KMAHD]

Yes trying similar stuff - especially regarding tophat fusion one thing that confuses me is that the output file does not list the samples in the top_dir or the main directory.

This is more of a technical question I guess.

So, I am running tophat fusion search on all samples individually with in the top dir. however when i run the post process the final output result txt and html files do not the sample. I believe the result file should list them - as shown in the example files online.

In addition just wanted to know if you tried any other approach and how successful you were with that.

Thanks

[himanshu04]

Hi KMAHD,
I am still trying to modify the parameters and check if it works. Don't think I am still convinced on what is real and not in the fusions. I will post about the same if I make any progress. Are you trying to do the same?.
Thanks,
HImanshu

[KMAHD]

Hi,

Any update on how you went with your data and what worked?

[himanshu04]

Thanks a lot for the quick reply Dinesh. I was thinking of using DeFuse, but was not sure if that would work great with mouse samples. I think I will read the paper in order to understand what are true fusions and what are false positives. But, the main problem is that it shows fusions in the control sample as well. But, Once again Thanks a lot for your help. Any comments/suggestions are most appreciated if anyone has more inputs for this matter.
Thanks,
Himanshu

[DineshCyanam]

Yes, finding fusions in wild type is strange. Not sure what is happening there. But I would look at the alignment that tophat-fusion-post generates (easier to look at the html output) showing the supporting reads. Quoting the TopHat-Fusion paper, "As reported in Edgren et al., true fusion transcripts have reads mapping uniformly in a wide window across the fusion point, whereas false positive fusions are narrowly covered." I would also watch out for readthrough gene fusions but some might be real. The paper below describes readthrough fusions...

http://www.biomedcentral.com/1755-8794/4/11

TopHat-Fusion gives you both known and novel fusions and at the end of the html output file it lists the Mitelman database of known gene fusions in cancer. Also, the fusions in the results list are sorted by the fusion score.

Have a look at deFuse. In my experience, if a novel fusion is found by both TopHat-Fusion and deFuse, then it would be an interesting candidate to look at. But all my analysis is based on human samples so I generally go with the default parameters since they are almost always optimized for human reads.

http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/defuse/index.php?title=DeFuse

-Dinesh

[himanshu04]

Hi Dinesh,
Thanks a lot for your reply. I did use --non-human flag. Also, when I manually filter out the fusions.out file, I find fusions in our wild type samples which is not expected. One question I have is how do you find what is real and what is artifact in the output. Also, what I understand is that tophat -fusion -post gives us the known fusions and not the novel fusions?. So, I decided to manually filter the fusions.out produced at the first step. Can you suggest me a better tool or what options can I change to get better results?.

[DineshCyanam]

What flags did you use to run tophat-fusion-post? Did you use the --non-human flag?

-Dinesh

[himanshu04]

Hi everyone,
We have rna-seq data from our samples in mouse. The reads are paired end reads each of 76bp length. We wanted to detect fusions in them using Tophat fusion. We already know certain major fusions that exist between two chromosomes by FISH,SKY etc. So, we want to test tophat fusion if it can detect the same for us. I get the output of tophat fusion and tophat fusion post but the important fusion is still missing. I wanted to know if I am doing something wrong as I am not experienced in using the fusion search in tophat.
I am providing the code that i used to run it. Kindly let me know if I should change it and try.
Here is the options I used :
tophat2 -o tophat_out --fusion-min-dist 100000 --fusion-search --keep-fasta-order --bowtie1 --no-coverage-search --mate-inner-distance 11 --mate-std-dev 57 --fusion-ignore-chromosomes chrM -p 8 /path/to/bowtie/mm9 seq1 seq2

Any help is much appreciated.
Thanks,
Himanshu