Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • areyes
    replied
    The motivation of the development of DESeq and DEXSeq is being able to estimate biological variability between replicates, and take this into account to call differentially expressed genes or exons. If you donĀ“t have replicates, you do not know if the changes that you are observing are due to biological variation or due to the differences in your genotypes. In any experiment is crucial to do replicates, this is the only way to guarantee reproducibility on your differential expressed calls. For more details, you could check:



    the discussion of our DEXSeq paper:

    An international, peer-reviewed genome sciences journal featuring outstanding original research that offers novel insights into the biology of all organisms

    Leave a comment:


  • gokhulkrishnakilaru
    replied
    Originally posted by areyes View Post
    Hi gokhulkrishnakilaru,

    The error talks by its own: "Underdetermined model; cannot estimate dispersions. Maybe replicates have not been properly specified.", you do not have replicates. Sorry that I can not help.

    Alejandro
    Thanks Alejandro,

    So no dexseq could work without replicates?

    Is that the conclusion?

    Is there a possibility to change the declaration while specifying the replicates in this section

    Code:
    samples = data.frame(condition = c("WT", "KO"),replicate=c(1,1),row.names=c("WildType", "KnockOut"),stringsAsFactors=TRUE,check.names = FALSE)

    Leave a comment:


  • areyes
    replied
    Hi gokhulkrishnakilaru,

    The error talks by its own: "Underdetermined model; cannot estimate dispersions. Maybe replicates have not been properly specified.", you do not have replicates. Sorry that I can not help.

    Alejandro

    Leave a comment:


  • gokhulkrishnakilaru
    replied
    Any thoughts anybody?

    Sorry mods, for bumping up posts.

    Urgent task. So, had to.

    Leave a comment:


  • gokhulkrishnakilaru
    replied
    Originally posted by areyes View Post
    You could, but they are also deleted automatically in the function "read.HTSeqCounts"!
    Hi Alejandro,

    I was successful in making the counts file as you suggested. I ran the script. The following are my errors. Any pointers that could be of help?

    Code:
    ecs<- estimateSizeFactors(ecs)
    > ecs<- estimateDispersions(ecs)
    Dispersion estimation. (Progress report: one dot per 100 genes)
    Error in FUN(c("ENSMUSG00000000078", "ENSMUSG00000000134", "ENSMUSG00000000182",  : 
      Underdetermined model; cannot estimate dispersions. Maybe replicates have not been properly specified.
    In addition: Warning messages:
    1: In .local(object, ...) :
      Exons with less than 11 counts will be discarded. For more details read the documentation, parameter minCount
    2: In .local(object, ...) :
      Genes with more than 70 testable exons will be kicked out of the analysis. For more details read the documentation, parameter maxExon
    I was looking at this link - http://seqanswers.com/forums/archive...p/t-21212.html. Can I delete that line for my case?
    Last edited by gokhulkrishnakilaru; 10-10-2012, 06:35 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • areyes
    replied
    You could, but they are also deleted automatically in the function "read.HTSeqCounts"!

    Leave a comment:


  • gokhulkrishnakilaru
    replied
    Originally posted by areyes View Post
    By the way, where can I download the annotation files you used?
    ftp://ftp.ensembl.org/pub/release-68/gtf/mus_musculus

    That is where I got the one that worked for me.

    You can use genome.ucsc.edu and go to tables section. Choose mouse and refseq genes and then refFlat or refGene. Select format to be GTF and if you are successful in preparing the annotations file. Please upload it somewhere or I can invite you to my dropbox. So, that way I have a refseq annotation file.

    Thanks for the support, my friend.

    Leave a comment:


  • gokhulkrishnakilaru
    replied
    Originally posted by areyes View Post
    I see, I think the files you are using as input are causing some problems with the output of our htseq python scripts. I will check what is going on. In the meantime you can reformat your files to look more like this:

    Code:
    FBgn0000003:001	0
    FBgn0000008:001	0
    FBgn0000008:002	0
    FBgn0000008:003	0
    FBgn0000008:004	1
    FBgn0000008:005	4
    FBgn0000008:006	1
    FBgn0000008:007	18
    FBgn0000008:008	4
    FBgn0000008:009	16
    Then it should be fine!
    Perfect. That helps me. Also, what about those last four lines with the underscore sign and a numerical value. Can I delete them?

    Leave a comment:


  • areyes
    replied
    By the way, where can I download the annotation files you used?

    Leave a comment:


  • areyes
    replied
    I see, I think the files you are using as input are causing some problems with the output of our htseq python scripts. I will check what is going on. In the meantime you can reformat your files to look more like this:

    Code:
    FBgn0000003:001	0
    FBgn0000008:001	0
    FBgn0000008:002	0
    FBgn0000008:003	0
    FBgn0000008:004	1
    FBgn0000008:005	4
    FBgn0000008:006	1
    FBgn0000008:007	18
    FBgn0000008:008	4
    FBgn0000008:009	16
    Then it should be fine!

    Leave a comment:


  • gokhulkrishnakilaru
    replied
    Originally posted by areyes View Post
    ups, my bad in the gtf extensions thing...

    does your files contain NAs also?
    No. My files have either a value or 0 for nothing. Also, I see another error saying
    error in scan(file what nmax sep dec quote skip nlines na.strings line 1 did not have 3 elements
    I looked the tail of my counts file and it has got some four lines in the last saying _ambiguous, _lowqual etc.

    I deleted those lines and it gives me another error saying
    Error in round(countData) : Non-numeric argument to mathematical function
    .

    Any pointers to these issues. This is my counts file's head

    Code:
    "ENSMUSG00000000001"    :001	1
    "ENSMUSG00000000001"    :002	0
    "ENSMUSG00000000001"    :003	0
    "ENSMUSG00000000001"    :004	1
    "ENSMUSG00000000001"    :005	0
    "ENSMUSG00000000001"    :006	0
    "ENSMUSG00000000001"    :007	0
    "ENSMUSG00000000001"    :008	0
    Last edited by gokhulkrishnakilaru; 10-10-2012, 05:54 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • areyes
    replied
    ups, my bad in the gtf extensions thing...

    do your files contain NAs also?
    Last edited by areyes; 10-10-2012, 05:54 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • gokhulkrishnakilaru
    replied
    Originally posted by areyes View Post
    Have you checked the size of your first file? Looks like you are replacing your input file with the output file.

    Could you please include a reproducible code for your R code? with the output of the sessionInput()? Also, I would not have many hopes in the results without replicates

    Alejandro Reyes
    Hi Alejandro,

    Yes, I did check the size of the input file. I am changing the extension. The input file has GTF and the output has GFF as its extension.

    My R code is as follows

    Code:
    library(DEXSeq)
    options(digits=3)
    setwd("/test/dexseq/")
    library(DEXSeq)
    rm(list=ls())
    annotationfile = file.path("/test/dexseq/Mus_musculus.GRCm38.68.gff")
    annotationfile
    samples = data.frame(condition = c("WT", "KO"),replicate=c(1,1),row.names=c("WildType", "KnockOut"),stringsAsFactors=TRUE,check.names = FALSE)
    samples
    fullFilenames<- list.files("/test/dexseq/",full.names=TRUE,pattern="DEXSEQ.txt")
    fullFilenames
    ecs<- read.HTSeqCounts(countfiles = fullFilenames,design = samples,flattenedfile = annotationfile)
    head(counts(ecs))
    head(fData(ecs))
    All I see is NA and the estimate size factor is also giving out NA.

    Leave a comment:


  • areyes
    replied
    Have you checked the size of your first file? Looks like you are replacing your input file with the output file.

    Could you please include a reproducible code for your R code? with the output of the sessionInput()? Also, I would not have many hopes in the results without replicates

    Alejandro Reyes

    Leave a comment:


  • DEXSEQ Prepare Annotation File and R output

    Hi Folks,

    I have downloaded the DEXSEQ package from Bioconductor.

    When I try to make the annotation file using the dexseq_prepare_annotations.py script, a gff file is generated but is of zero KB in size.

    I tried with the following files

    Mus_musculus.NCBIM37.64.gtf
    Mouse_UCSC_Refgene.gtf (Refgene from UCSC)
    Mouse_UCSC_RefFlat.gtf (Refflat from UCSC)
    And, all I got was a zero KB file.

    The command I tried was

    Code:
    python dexseq_prepare_annotation.py Mus_musculus.NCBIM37.64.gtf Mus_musculus.NCBIM37.64.gff
    The above command works for Mus_musculus.GRCm38.68.gtf downloaded from Ensemble and I don't understand why it wouldn't work for the NCBI gtf from the same Ensemble.

    Also, the R output from running DEXSEQ using Mus_musculus.GRCm38.68.gf and one wild type and one knock out sample (no replicates) didn't give me anything. All I see is NA in all the columns. I am using the bam files from Tophat aligned to Refseq annotation.

    What am I doing wrong? Any pointers are highly appreciated.

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • seqadmin
    Non-Coding RNA Research and Technologies
    by seqadmin




    Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) do not code for proteins but play important roles in numerous cellular processes including gene silencing, developmental pathways, and more. There are numerous types including microRNA (miRNA), long ncRNA (lncRNA), circular RNA (circRNA), and more. In this article, we discuss innovative ncRNA research and explore recent technological advancements that improve the study of ncRNAs.

    Nobel Prize for MicroRNA Discovery
    This week,...
    10-07-2024, 08:07 AM
  • seqadmin
    Recent Developments in Metagenomics
    by seqadmin





    Metagenomics has improved the way researchers study microorganisms across diverse environments. Historically, studying microorganisms relied on culturing them in the lab, a method that limits the investigation of many species since most are unculturable1. Metagenomics overcomes these issues by allowing the study of microorganisms regardless of their ability to be cultured or the environments they inhabit. Over time, the field has evolved, especially with the advent...
    09-23-2024, 06:35 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by seqadmin, 10-02-2024, 04:51 AM
0 responses
104 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 10-01-2024, 07:10 AM
0 responses
112 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 09-30-2024, 08:33 AM
1 response
116 views
0 likes
Last Post EmiTom
by EmiTom
 
Started by seqadmin, 09-26-2024, 12:57 PM
0 responses
22 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Working...
X