Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • lyz1030
    Member
    • Mar 2011
    • 33

    extra high coverage regions in exome sequencing data

    Hi everyone,

    What reasons are the extra high coverage regions in exome sequencing data caused by? I want to know if can affect variant calling. What effect can it bring, false positive or false negative?

    Thanks
  • simonandrews
    Simon Andrews
    • May 2009
    • 870

    #2
    There may be some variation in coverage due to changes in the capture efficiency of different regions - often attributed to GC content, but most capture system vendors are getting on top of this.

    Larger variations in coverage are more likely to be the result of mismapping of repetitive regions. Depending on how you've done your mapping you may find that reads which can map to multiple positions are allowed to map more than once in the genome, which can produce towers of reads in your results.

    Even if you only choose to see uniquely mapping reads you can still see overrepresented mismapped regions where you get reads from parts of the genome which are not present in the genome assembly, and are therefore invisible to the read mapping program.

    In general you should be very suspicious of results coming from regions with very high read coverage compared to the rest of the sample since mismapped sequences will lead to false SNP predictions and would dilute any real SNPs in the region.

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • GATTACAT
      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by GATTACAT
      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
      07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
    0 responses
    23 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
    0 responses
    23 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
    0 responses
    23 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
    0 responses
    55 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...