Right, I forgot to precise that GEM is exhaustive and reports *all* possible alignments within a maximum number of mismatches. There are indeed many other alignments for read1.
Still, I find it surprising that the primary alignment is transchromosomal (chrX-chr18) when a perfect match is found for a mate on the same chromosome. I should probably ask the authors.
Thanks for your answer kmcarr.
Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
-
Originally posted by syfo View PostIn that SAM file, read1's mate is read2 but read2's mate is not read1. Is that possible? Both are on chrX, convergent orientation (-> <-), perfectly mapped (36M).
Code:HWI-M00185:3:000000000-A1BH4:1:1101:5903:5381 353 chrX 66951034 254 36M = 66957305 0 AAATGGCAAAAAGACAAAAATAAATAAATAAATAAA ?????BBBDDDBDDDDFFFFFFIIIIIIIIIHIIII RG:Z:0 NM:i:0 XT:A:R md:Z:36 HWI-M00185:3:000000000-A1BH4:1:1101:5903:5381 145 chrX 66957305 254 36M chr18 37526012 0 ACATGGTAACCTGTCTCATAGCAGGACTCTGGAATG ?????BBBDDDDDDDDFFFFFFCHIHHIIIIIFHII RG:Z:0 NM:i:1 XT:A:U md:Z:1T34
Reads from the two fastq files:
Code:@HWI-M00185:3:000000000-A1BH4:1:1101:5903:5381 1:N:0:GTCCGCTTTATTTATTTATTTATTTTTGTCTTTTTGCCATTT @HWI-M00185:3:000000000-A1BH4:1:1101:5903:5381 2:N:0:GTCCGCCATTCCAGAGTCCTGCTATGAGACAGGTTACCATGT
What do you think, bug or feature?
Thanks
How primary/secondary alignments are determined and reported is a function of the mapping program used. I am not familiar with GEM mapper so can't provide any insight there.
Leave a comment:
-
Inconsistent pairing in SAM file?
In that SAM file, read1's mate is read2 but read2's mate is not read1. Is that possible? Both are on chrX, convergent orientation (-> <-), perfectly mapped (36M).
Code:HWI-M00185:3:000000000-A1BH4:1:1101:5903:5381 353 chrX 66951034 254 36M = 66957305 0 AAATGGCAAAAAGACAAAAATAAATAAATAAATAAA ?????BBBDDDBDDDDFFFFFFIIIIIIIIIHIIII RG:Z:0 NM:i:0 XT:A:R md:Z:36 HWI-M00185:3:000000000-A1BH4:1:1101:5903:5381 145 chrX 66957305 254 36M chr18 37526012 0 ACATGGTAACCTGTCTCATAGCAGGACTCTGGAATG ?????BBBDDDDDDDDFFFFFFCHIHHIIIIIFHII RG:Z:0 NM:i:1 XT:A:U md:Z:1T34
Reads from the two fastq files:
Code:@HWI-M00185:3:000000000-A1BH4:1:1101:5903:5381 1:N:0:GTCCGCTTTATTTATTTATTTATTTTTGTCTTTTTGCCATTT @HWI-M00185:3:000000000-A1BH4:1:1101:5903:5381 2:N:0:GTCCGCCATTCCAGAGTCCTGCTATGAGACAGGTTACCATGT
What do you think, bug or feature?
ThanksTags: None
Latest Articles
Collapse
-
by seqadmin
Innovations in next-generation sequencing technologies and techniques are driving more precise and comprehensive exploration of complex biological systems. Current advancements include improved accessibility for long-read sequencing and significant progress in single-cell and 3D genomics. This article explores some of the most impactful developments in the field over the past year.
Long-Read Sequencing
Long-read sequencing has seen remarkable advancements,...-
Channel: Articles
12-02-2024, 01:49 PM -
ad_right_rmr
Collapse
News
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by seqadmin, Yesterday, 08:24 AM
|
0 responses
10 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
Yesterday, 08:24 AM
|
||
Started by seqadmin, 12-12-2024, 07:41 AM
|
0 responses
8 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
12-12-2024, 07:41 AM
|
||
Started by seqadmin, 12-11-2024, 07:45 AM
|
0 responses
15 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
12-11-2024, 07:45 AM
|
||
Started by seqadmin, 12-10-2024, 07:59 AM
|
0 responses
14 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
12-10-2024, 07:59 AM
|
Leave a comment: