My guess is that the information will be considered for mapping reads to the GTF file if supplied with -G . In that dataset, read pairs should be concordant with transcript strand. i,e., if -library-type first-strand was indicated, and transcript A is at coods. X to Y, + strand, read of the mate pair should map to the reverse-complement of the 3' end of TRANSCRIPT A, and READ 2 of the mate pair should map to the 5' end, in the same orientation as the transcript sequence.
However, if no GTF is supplied with -G, or in the subsequent stage of mapping reads that didn't map to the transcriptome, now to the whole genome, then TopHat should make no use of library-type information, right?
Thanks,
Carmen
Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
-
Does tophat use the library-type information for mapping, or just for the XS flag?
Hi all, quick question:
When I specify library-type to TopHat, i.e., first-strand, second-strand, unstranded, TopHat appends a value + or - to the XS:A tag, which is useful for subsequent analyses, such as annotation.
However, does this information influence the "mappability" of reads, or is this unaffected?
Carmen
--library-type
TopHat will treat the reads as strand specific. Every read alignment will have an XS attribute tag. Consider supplying library type options below to select the correct RNA-seq protocol.Tags: None
Latest Articles
Collapse
-
by seqadmin
The human gut contains trillions of microorganisms that impact digestion, immune functions, and overall health1. Despite major breakthroughs, we’re only beginning to understand the full extent of the microbiome’s influence on health and disease. Advances in next-generation sequencing and spatial biology have opened new windows into this complex environment, yet many questions remain. This article highlights two recent studies exploring how diet influences microbial...-
Channel: Articles
02-24-2025, 06:31 AM -
ad_right_rmr
Collapse
News
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by seqadmin, 03-03-2025, 01:15 PM
|
0 responses
177 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
03-03-2025, 01:15 PM
|
||
Started by seqadmin, 02-28-2025, 12:58 PM
|
0 responses
267 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
02-28-2025, 12:58 PM
|
||
Started by seqadmin, 02-24-2025, 02:48 PM
|
0 responses
652 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
02-24-2025, 02:48 PM
|
||
Started by seqadmin, 02-21-2025, 02:46 PM
|
0 responses
266 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
02-21-2025, 02:46 PM
|
Leave a comment: