Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • bwa-mem paired reads problem

    Hi,

    I have aligned several re-sequenced individuals (Illumina HiSeq, paired-end with IS ~450bp) to a draft assembly, and when looking at the alignments in IGV, it seemed like almost all of them had their mate mapped on a different scaffold.

    I extracted some read pairs from the bam file and got this weired result:
    HWI-ST0866:1861D42ACXX:2:1313:18722:3523 pR1 scaffold37985 44312 60 100M scaffold54822 4963 0 AATAAATCTACCCCAGCCAGCCTAAAGCCACTCCCTCCTGTCCCATCACTTCATGCCTTTTCACAAAGTCCCTTCTCAGCCTTTTTGCAGCAGCAATCAG @BCFDDFFHHHHHJJIIIFIIJIIJGIGDIIIJJJJIJI<BGHIFJIJJIIJIIJJJJHIJJCE;CDHCC?CCEHFEFFFFE3>@CDDDDDB@DBDACCD NM:i:0 AS:i:100 XS:i:0
    HWI-ST0866:1861D42ACXX:2:1313:18722:3523 prR2 scaffold37985 44635 60 100M scaffold39009 30358 0 TGAAGGGTTAAAAACACATGGAGCCAGCATGTTCTGATCACTGAGAAACAACACTGTGAATCAGCACAGCAGCAAATGGGAGTGACAGGCACTGGAGATG CDDBACEECDECCBFFHFHHHIJIJIGIJIJJJJJJIHHIJJJJJIJIHDDHGIHIGIIGDJJIJJIIIIGIFJJJJJJJJJJJJJJHHHHGFFFFFCCC NM:i:1 AS:i:95 XS:i:0

    The first read in the pair is located on scaffold37985 and says it has its mate on scaffold54822, but when looking at the mate (second line) it's also located on scaffold37985, but reports to have a mate on scaffold39009!
    To me this seems so wrong, why can't they just form a proper pair, when they obviously have perfect matches close to each other on the same scaffold??? Am I missing something here?

    I ran bwa mem on 8 cores with otherwise default settings :
    bwa mem -t 8 reference readfile1.fastq readfile2.fastq >out.sam

    Any input on this would be much appreciated!
    Linnéa

  • #2
    Hi Linnea,
    Are you sure these are the only two mappings of this fragment? Could you post the results of

    grep -w "HWI-ST0866:1861D42ACXX:2:1313:18722:3523" file.bam
    Please answer my unsolved question - http://seqanswers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=33740

    Comment


    • #3
      Thanks for your reply, actually that was the result from grep.. so no other mappings.

      However, I think I've just found the problem anyway.. When I checked if the fastq files were sorted properly, I used "head" and "less", and all the read names looked the same between the two files, but checking the line numbers for the pair above showed that they are in fact not on the same line. Turned out that while the beginning of the files were nicely sorted, the rest are not

      So no problem with bwa mem, only with my data!
      Now I only need to figure out how the h* that could happen...

      Sorry for posting!

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • seqadmin
        Understanding Genetic Influence on Infectious Disease
        by seqadmin




        During the COVID-19 pandemic, scientists observed that while some individuals experienced severe illness when infected with SARS-CoV-2, others were barely affected. These disparities left researchers and clinicians wondering what causes the wide variations in response to viral infections and what role genetics plays.

        Jean-Laurent Casanova, M.D., Ph.D., Professor at Rockefeller University, is a leading expert in this crossover between genetics and infectious...
        09-09-2024, 10:59 AM
      • seqadmin
        Addressing Off-Target Effects in CRISPR Technologies
        by seqadmin






        The first FDA-approved CRISPR-based therapy marked the transition of therapeutic gene editing from a dream to reality1. CRISPR technologies have streamlined gene editing, and CRISPR screens have become an important approach for identifying genes involved in disease processes2. This technique introduces targeted mutations across numerous genes, enabling large-scale identification of gene functions, interactions, and pathways3. Identifying the full range...
        08-27-2024, 04:44 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by seqadmin, Yesterday, 02:44 PM
      0 responses
      8 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 09-06-2024, 08:02 AM
      0 responses
      145 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 09-03-2024, 08:30 AM
      0 responses
      152 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 08-27-2024, 04:40 AM
      0 responses
      159 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Working...
      X