Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jake13
    Member
    • Aug 2013
    • 23

    #1

    cuffdiff dispersion cutting off low values

    I've been running cuffdiff on some paired end rna seq samples with biological replicates. Before I started analyzing them I checked the dispersion plots using cummeRbund. For some reason it is forming a sharp cutoff which looks different from the examples on the websites. I have tried mapping both with tophat2.0.9 and STAR aligner and got identical results.

    I have been using cuffdiff with the default options except for -b and using the genes.gtf file provided by the Illumina iGenomes download. Does anyone have ideas on what might be going wrong?
    Thanks
    Attached Files
  • jake13
    Member
    • Aug 2013
    • 23

    #2
    An update for anyone else running into this problem. It seems to be caused by the gtf file that I was using. I tried grabbing the refseq gtf file from the UCSC table browser as well as the genes.gtf fill that's included in the Illumina iGenomes package. I ran identical reads with identical settings through tophat/cuffdiff except for using these two different gtf files. The UCSC one is on the left and looks correct, the iGenomes one is on the right and has the weird cutoff. I have no idea why this is occurring. Does anyone have any thoughts?
    Attached Files

    Comment

    • blouro
      Junior Member
      • Sep 2008
      • 4

      #3
      Up with this topic, because I'm getting similar problem. Used the Tophat and tuxedo tools pipeline, and now looking at the dispersion plots I'm getting a strange profile in two aspects, the values are way off the expected range, and the dispersion profile seem way zoomed out due to few lower values. Please see attached plot and give me your opinion, it will be much appreciated!

      P.s For the cuffdiff analysis I used the merged gtf file created in the cuffmerge step.
      Attached Files

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • kinpict.com
        Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
        by kinpict.com
        The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
        Today, 06:37 PM
      • SEQadmin2
        16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
        by SEQadmin2





        NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
        10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
      0 responses
      27 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
      0 responses
      35 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
      2 responses
      56 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post kinpict.com  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
      0 responses
      175 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...