Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Design for normalization using DESeq

    Hi all, I am analyzing 16S sequenced data of human fecal samples. I proccessed my data with qiime and have been using the R package phyloseq for the data analysis. I wish to use the phyloseq to DESeq command of the R package DESeq2 to normalize by data to stabilize the variance, and avoid rarefaction.

    My question is that I am not certain of the design I should use. I attach 10 rows of my samples variables info.

    #SampleID Treatment Treatment1 Time Sex Age Individual
    1.1 P P0 T0 F 33 1
    1.2 P P1 T1 F 33 1
    2.1 O O0 T0 F 28 2
    2.2 O O1 T1 F 28 2
    3.1 Control C0 T0 M 24 3
    3.2 Control C1 T1 M 24 3
    4.1 Control C0 T0 M 28 4
    4.2 Control C1 T1 M 28 4
    5.1 O+P OP0 T0 M 24 5
    5.2 O+P OP1 T1 M 24 5

    I had a n=40, which I randomly assigned in 4 groups ( 3 treatments (O, P and the combination of O+P) and a control group). For each group I sequenced a fecal sample prior to the treatment (T0) and after it (T1). So in total I ended up with 80 libraries from 80 samples.
    What I want to compare is the difference of composition/abundance 1) between measurements of T0 and T1 within the treatments, and the difference of composition/abundance 2) between the treatments.

    At first I used Treatment1 for the design which is a variable that combines the treatment and time. Afterwords I saw in tutorials that people uses those kind of variables separated, and also incorporated patients variable so I used the design ~ Individual + Time + Treatment.
    But R throws the error

    error in DESeqDataSet(se, design = design, ignoreRank) :
    the model matrix is not full rank, so the model cannot be fit as specified.
    one or more variables or interaction terms in the design formula
    are linear combinations of the others and must be removed


    this also happens when I put Treatment and Individual in the design, but other combinations like Time and Individual or Treatment and Time, work just fine.

    I thought it was good to add the individuals as a variable to the design, considering that the samples that are in the same treatment-time group are the biologica replica, but show great variability in the abundance count (composition of microbiota among individuals are very large in some cases).
    I thought that adding the individual variable to the desing would help to account for that variability. However maybe by adding this variable, the degrees of freedom would be bigger and the weight of the Treatment and Time variables explaining the changes in the abundances could become insignificant if the changes are subte?


    I have been trying to understand by my self reading the DESeq papers but I lack the statistical knowledge, and would like to ask you for help in understanding the error and what would be the best design for the analysis.

    thank you!!! Cheers

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • seqadmin
    Exploring the Dynamics of the Tumor Microenvironment
    by seqadmin




    The complexity of cancer is clearly demonstrated in the diverse ecosystem of the tumor microenvironment (TME). The TME is made up of numerous cell types and its development begins with the changes that happen during oncogenesis. “Genomic mutations, copy number changes, epigenetic alterations, and alternative gene expression occur to varying degrees within the affected tumor cells,” explained Andrea O’Hara, Ph.D., Strategic Technical Specialist at Azenta. “As...
    07-08-2024, 03:19 PM
  • seqadmin
    Exploring Human Diversity Through Large-Scale Omics
    by seqadmin


    In 2003, researchers from the Human Genome Project (HGP) announced the most comprehensive genome to date1. Although the genome wasn’t fully completed until nearly 20 years later2, numerous large-scale projects, such as the International HapMap Project and 1000 Genomes Project, continued the HGP's work, capturing extensive variation and genomic diversity within humans. Recently, newer initiatives have significantly increased in scale and expanded beyond genomics, offering a more detailed...
    06-25-2024, 06:43 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by seqadmin, Yesterday, 07:20 AM
0 responses
23 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 07-16-2024, 05:49 AM
0 responses
38 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 07-15-2024, 06:53 AM
0 responses
44 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 07-10-2024, 07:30 AM
0 responses
41 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Working...
X