Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Quality Filtering of assembled reads central region

    Dear all,
    I have ecountered some problems on my latest Miseq run with 2x300 kit (as I see from posts on the forum, is quite a common problem at the moment) and ended up with read1 and read2 with early dropping sequence quality.

    I am analyzing the data now and first of all I used pear (with default settings) to join the reads, ending up with a per base quality like the one reported in image attached.

    The question are:
    1) first of all, should I care of the low-quality region in the middle of the assembled read? Or is it not really that bad?

    2) the low quality bases at the end of the assembled are easily handled with a trimmer, I used sickle and worked fine, but how should I handle the low quality region in the middle of the assembled?


    By the way, this is my first post, but I'm browsing the forum from some time now, and I want to take this occasion to thank you all for the precious information I got!!
    Attached Files

  • #2
    Hi svito,
    1) If I got it right, this is a plot of the merged reads, isn't it? In that case, what you are seeing is probably just an overlap of the quality drops towards the end of the individual forward/reverse reads. This is quite normal and your quality drop is not really that big. I would not care about it as long as your mapping rates are not drastically lower than expected.
    2) Depending of what you're after, you could go for quality trimming before merging of the reads. But in your case I don't think quality trimming is necessary at all.

    Comment


    • #3
      Most of your reads still appear to be above Q24-25 so that is not so bad. Depending on what you are doing I concur with WhatsOEver that trimming may not be needed.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • seqadmin
        Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
        by seqadmin


        Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
        04-04-2024, 04:25 PM
      • seqadmin
        Strategies for Sequencing Challenging Samples
        by seqadmin


        Despite advancements in sequencing platforms and related sample preparation technologies, certain sample types continue to present significant challenges that can compromise sequencing results. Pedro Echave, Senior Manager of the Global Business Segment at Revvity, explained that the success of a sequencing experiment ultimately depends on the amount and integrity of the nucleic acid template (RNA or DNA) obtained from a sample. “The better the quality of the nucleic acid isolated...
        03-22-2024, 06:39 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
      0 responses
      30 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
      0 responses
      32 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
      0 responses
      28 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
      0 responses
      52 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Working...
      X