Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
-
Okay, thanks for the clarification. So since there are no plasmids specified in the other final_contigs.fasta files from using kmer values less than 127, I can confidently say there are no plasmids in these and were only found when using a kmer value of 127?
-
Plasmids are present in multiple copies per cell, whereas the host genome is (typically) a single copy. More copies = higher read depth.
Leave a comment:
-
I was using plasmidSPAdes. If I understand correctly, the plasmid contigs are able to assemble at higher kmer values because they are present at a higher read depth. Why are they more present at higher read depths than the host cell? What about coverage?
Leave a comment:
-
And also why are plasmids only output in the K127 folder final_contigs.fasta and not the other kmer value folders?
Also, if you're only interested in the plasmid sequences, you may want to use plasmidSPAdes (described here).Last edited by HESmith; 07-28-2016, 08:30 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
Update:
In the K127 folder there is also before_chromosome_removal.fasta file. When I try to see if contig in the final_contigs.fasta is in the aformentioned file, I do not find them. So are the sequences that are supposedly plasmid sequences from the final_contigs.fasta in the K127 folder and contigs.fasta in the main SPAdes output directory in the final_contigs.fasta files in the other folders? What exactly is the difference between them all?
Leave a comment:
-
SPAdes plasmids output
Hello all. I have done a plasmidSPAdes run on my bacterial reads to look for any plasmids. In the final output directory, I have the contigs.fasta file which contains the plasmids with the suffix componenet_X denoting each respective plasmid.
When looking at the different kmer value folders the K21-K99 folders seem to contain assemblies of the bacterial contigs in the final_contigs.fasta file, as a normal SPAdes run would. However, the K127 folder final_contigs.fasta is instead similar to the contigs.fasta file mentioned above - it seems to only contain plasmids and not the bacterial contigs.
After comparing the K127 final_contigs.fasta and contigs.fasta files with diff, they have differences. My question is why are these two files different? Is the contigs.fasta file different because SPAdes ran the mismatch corrector? And also why are plasmids only output in the K127 folder final_contigs.fasta and not the other kmer value folders?
ThanksLast edited by ronaldrcutler; 07-26-2016, 07:51 PM.
Latest Articles
Collapse
-
by seqadmin
Despite advancements in sequencing platforms and related sample preparation technologies, certain sample types continue to present significant challenges that can compromise sequencing results. Pedro Echave, Senior Manager of the Global Business Segment at Revvity, explained that the success of a sequencing experiment ultimately depends on the amount and integrity of the nucleic acid template (RNA or DNA) obtained from a sample. “The better the quality of the nucleic acid isolated...-
Channel: Articles
03-22-2024, 06:39 AM -
-
by seqadmin
The field of conservation genomics centers on applying genomics technologies in support of conservation efforts and the preservation of biodiversity. This article features interviews with two researchers who showcase their innovative work and highlight the current state and future of conservation genomics.
Avian Conservation
Matthew DeSaix, a recent doctoral graduate from Kristen Ruegg’s lab at The University of Colorado, shared that most of his research...-
Channel: Articles
03-08-2024, 10:41 AM -
ad_right_rmr
Collapse
News
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by seqadmin, Yesterday, 06:37 PM
|
0 responses
10 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
Yesterday, 06:37 PM
|
||
Started by seqadmin, Yesterday, 06:07 PM
|
0 responses
10 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
Yesterday, 06:07 PM
|
||
Started by seqadmin, 03-22-2024, 10:03 AM
|
0 responses
51 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
03-22-2024, 10:03 AM
|
||
Started by seqadmin, 03-21-2024, 07:32 AM
|
0 responses
67 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
03-21-2024, 07:32 AM
|
Leave a comment: