Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Selecting the best alignment BAM file

    Hi,

    I have a PE dataset 300bp inserts by illumina MiSeq. I aligned the raw data using BWA-mem. Mapping statistics generated using Samtools flagstat are below.

    5541008 + 0 in total (QC-passed reads + QC-failed reads)
    0 + 0 secondary
    76008 + 0 supplementary
    0 + 0 duplicates
    5413610 + 0 mapped (97.70% : N/A)
    5465000 + 0 paired in sequencing
    2732500 + 0 read1
    2732500 + 0 read2
    5266140 + 0 properly paired (96.36% : N/A)
    5319406 + 0 with itself and mate mapped
    18196 + 0 singletons (0.33% : N/A)
    32368 + 0 with mate mapped to a different chr
    8821 + 0 with mate mapped to a different chr (mapQ>=5)

    I also used Trimmomatic on the same dataset, ILLUMINACLIP to remove any adapter sequences, trimmed reads sliding window 4:10, leading & trailing bases <3, length <39bp. Aligned this set using BWA-mem and got the results as below.

    5529752 + 0 in total (QC-passed reads + QC-failed reads)
    0 + 0 secondary
    65642 + 0 supplementary
    0 + 0 duplicates
    5396698 + 0 mapped (97.59% : N/A)
    5464110 + 0 paired in sequencing
    2732055 + 0 read1
    2732055 + 0 read2
    5263982 + 0 properly paired (96.34% : N/A)
    5308488 + 0 with itself and mate mapped
    22568 + 0 singletons (0.41% : N/A)
    23856 + 0 with mate mapped to a different chr
    4865 + 0 with mate mapped to a different chr (mapQ>=5)

    1) Can I use this information to select a best alignment based on mapped %. Raw data gave 97.7% mapping which is higher than trimmed data. So can I select BAM I got from raw data as the best?

    2) I used "samtools view -c -f 3 data.bam" to find the properly paired reads. But the value I got is different to the value for that parameter by flagstat for both datasets. I checked some other parameters like itself & mate mapped they too gave different results. What could be the reason.

    Appreciate your answers.
    Thanks in advance.

    Regds
    Rangika

  • #2
    Hi Rangika,

    2nd first:
    You need to be aware of the fact that samtools flagstat produces statistics on alignments. Meaning, a read can align multiple time and will occur multiple times in the flagstat output. You may check your alignment file with e.g. bam_stat.py from the RSeQC tools.
    Furthermore, I'd check the read files with FastQC before and after trimming.

    So:
    1) I'd check a set of different data sets to choose which way to go. Also, I would not rely on the %mapped from samtools flagstat.

    Cheers,
    Michael

    Comment


    • #3
      Thank you Michael. My dataset is DNA-seq. Can I use RSeQC tools to check alignment for DNA data as well. Do you suggest RSeQC statistics would lead in to better BAM selection?

      Appreciate if you would clarify this a bit more since I'm new to this.

      Regards
      Rangika

      Comment


      • #4
        The bam_stat.py was a suggestion since it also works for DNA-seq alignments (you'll hopefully don't see spliced reads).
        You can also have a look at the QC-metrics from Picard tools, or have a look at GATK.
        Or you can extract the aligned reads (samtools view) and count e.g. how often each read is aligned. Without trimming you might have a high %mapping rate given by samtools flagstat, but you don't know how many reads were aligned with a high confidence to a single or few positions.

        Most of the library preps have also a small section of how to deal with the analysis. Additionally, there are a plethora of publications describing their approach to DNA-Seq analysis.

        Cheers,
        Michael

        Comment


        • #5
          Thank you Michael for your answer.

          Regards
          Sumudu

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • seqadmin
            Recent Developments in Metagenomics
            by seqadmin





            Metagenomics has improved the way researchers study microorganisms across diverse environments. Historically, studying microorganisms relied on culturing them in the lab, a method that limits the investigation of many species since most are unculturable1. Metagenomics overcomes these issues by allowing the study of microorganisms regardless of their ability to be cultured or the environments they inhabit. Over time, the field has evolved, especially with the advent...
            09-23-2024, 06:35 AM
          • seqadmin
            Understanding Genetic Influence on Infectious Disease
            by seqadmin




            During the COVID-19 pandemic, scientists observed that while some individuals experienced severe illness when infected with SARS-CoV-2, others were barely affected. These disparities left researchers and clinicians wondering what causes the wide variations in response to viral infections and what role genetics plays.

            Jean-Laurent Casanova, M.D., Ph.D., Professor at Rockefeller University, is a leading expert in this crossover between genetics and infectious...
            09-09-2024, 10:59 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by seqadmin, 10-02-2024, 04:51 AM
          0 responses
          10 views
          0 likes
          Last Post seqadmin  
          Started by seqadmin, 10-01-2024, 07:10 AM
          0 responses
          16 views
          0 likes
          Last Post seqadmin  
          Started by seqadmin, 09-30-2024, 08:33 AM
          0 responses
          21 views
          0 likes
          Last Post seqadmin  
          Started by seqadmin, 09-26-2024, 12:57 PM
          0 responses
          17 views
          0 likes
          Last Post seqadmin  
          Working...
          X