Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • lorenzo.C
    replied
    thanks for the help good sir, if I understand correctly --al-conc <path> will produce a new couple of fastq that fulfil the --maxins option. the maxins command will take just reads that are spaced to a maximum number of base pairs in between. the problem I have is that the second read should have the opposite orientation of the first read to be selected by maxins (if I understand correctly), is there a way to not have this option selected? in other words I need to isolate reads that are within a certain range of the other direction, no matter the orientation (both should be considered valid).

    Leave a comment:


  • bluesmartini
    replied
    with Bowtie2, the (very extensive) documentation mentions the following options :

    --al-conc <path>
    Write paired-end reads that align concordantly at least once to file(s) at <path>. These reads correspond to the SAM records with the FLAGS 0x4 bit unset and either the 0x40 or 0x80 bit set (depending on whether it’s mate #1 or #2). .1 and .2 strings are added to the filename to distinguish which file contains mate #1 and mate #2


    So as output you will have 2 fastq files that contain the reads that align concordantly to your options.

    For the range between pairs, take a look at --maxins option.

    hope it will help

    aubin

    Leave a comment:


  • lorenzo.C
    replied
    BOWTIE2 would be great! thanks for the help!

    Leave a comment:


  • bluesmartini
    replied
    Hello,

    I would say that most of the aligners have this option. Which aligner do you want to use?

    Leave a comment:


  • lorenzo.C
    started a topic isolate reads from a paired-ended fastq files

    isolate reads from a paired-ended fastq files

    hi folks,
    I have pair ended fastq files (let's call them 01_R1 and 01_R2). I need to make a new pair of fastq files that contains just the reads that fulfill this requirement: the reads of R2 should be within a certain range (let's say no more than 100bp far) from the respective read in R1.
    any suggestion on how to approach this?

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • seqadmin
    Recent Advances in Sequencing Technologies
    by seqadmin



    Innovations in next-generation sequencing technologies and techniques are driving more precise and comprehensive exploration of complex biological systems. Current advancements include improved accessibility for long-read sequencing and significant progress in single-cell and 3D genomics. This article explores some of the most impactful developments in the field over the past year.

    Long-Read Sequencing
    Long-read sequencing has seen remarkable advancements,...
    12-02-2024, 01:49 PM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by seqadmin, 12-02-2024, 09:29 AM
0 responses
158 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 12-02-2024, 09:06 AM
0 responses
57 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 12-02-2024, 08:03 AM
0 responses
48 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 11-22-2024, 07:36 AM
0 responses
77 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Working...
X