Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • How to group reads from same duplex DNA fragment (Sureselect XT HS) grouping by UMI

    Hello everybody,

    I am trying to analyse a dataset generated using Sureselect XT-HS.

    I have three fastq files: forward, reverse and UMIs.

    For example:

    # FORWARD
    (base) [k1506263@login3(rosalind) HUMfeqzR]$ zcat 001MS/210601_I100400190019_V350004379_L1_001MS_1.fq.gz |head
    @V350004379L1C001R0010000005:0:0:0:0 1:N:0:TCTCTTCA
    TCCCTTTCTCTCCTTGGTACTTCTCTGCCAAATCCCTCCCAGAGAAACAGAGAACTTCTTTCTCTACCTGAACCAGGTTTTTAGGAAATGGGCCTTTTTC
    +
    GG?G?F@FGGGFGFB;FGGGGEAEGGEFG7GF>EGFD2DBFGCGBGGGAEBF?@?FGGGFFGFFDGFGEFFE@GDCF?GGFGEFG<EGEGFECFF76=AG
    @V350004379L1C001R0010000006:0:0:0:0 1:N:0:TCTCTTCA
    CCTACCAGACCCTTCAGTGAAGCTTTGATGATGGGCTTACTGACCAACCTGGCAGACAGGGAGCTGGTTCACATGATCAACTGGGCGAAGAGGGTGCCAG
    +
    FGE<FFFB1F;G=@FDFGD-F8@GB(F>>9F?CFCGFDFGCFD9EFGGEC6FBEB2*EEF(;7FGEF@F?EAEAF8CFB4?FD>FC9FFD7EFF?FF@F@
    @V350004379L1C001R0010000028:0:0:0:0 1:N:0:TCTCTTCA
    CGCCAATTTTAGCCTCTTTGCCCCCTTTGGCAGTGGCTGCCCAGTCAATGGGCAGAGCCAGCTGAGGGGGGCCTTTGGAAGTGGGGCGCTGCCCACTGGC

    # REVERSE
    (base) [k1506263@login3(rosalind) HUMfeqzR]$ zcat 001MS/210601_I100400190019_V350004379_L1_001MS_2.fq.gz | head
    @V350004379L1C001R0010000005:0:0:0:0 2:N:0:TCTCTTCA
    GGCCTCAGAAGACAGAAGAGAGACTGGGTTATTCCTCCCATCAGCTGCCCAGAAAATGAAAAAGGCCCATTTCCTAAAAACCCGGGTCAGGGAGAGAAAG
    +
    EDDDFD;B02/8F;F@DE:FFFEA<CAFDF?FFCF>FFF9FFA89@C=FF7CFFF77>-F4;FEF:FFFCBF,F93CA4FEC'97(G9CB;49*-F'=E9
    @V350004379L1C001R0010000006:0:0:0:0 2:N:0:TCTCTTCA
    ACTATTTCTCCCATGACATCACAACAAGTTCTTGAAAAGCTATTGACTCTTAAAAGCAGCGCTTCGCATTCTTACCTGGCACCCTCTTCGCCCAGGTGAT
    +
    FDAEFDFFFFFF;8FEED;CGAFDFDDFFFFDFD<F7AFFFEF=F@?FF=>AFF>FA'F>?FEA<?ECFF?CGDE@/2AD,F@C@FCF5?FF6EE.;FF/
    @V350004379L1C001R0010000028:0:0:0:0 2:N:0:TCTCTTCA
    CCCAAAAAATATTGCCATTTTTCTGACCTTGGTAAGCAGCTGGGAATAGTAGGCAGGGCCAGTGGGCAGCGCCCCACTTCCAAAGGCCCCCCTCAGCTGG

    # UMIS
    (base) [k1506263@login3(rosalind) HUMfeqzR]$ zcat UMI/210601_I100400190019_V350004379_L1_CHKPE85221050164-0/001MS_out2.fq.gz | head
    @V350004379L1C001R0010000005:0:0:0:0 2:N:0:TCTCTTCA
    TACAGGGGAG
    +
    )EEE>CFC9F
    @V350004379L1C001R0010000006:0:0:0:0 2:N:0:TCTCTTCA
    GTATAACCCT
    +
    F>EEFFEFFD
    @V350004379L1C001R0010000028:0:0:0:0 2:N:0:TCTCTTCA

    I believe that the Sureselect protocol produces reads from "duplex" fragments where you can identify pairs of reads coming from opposite DNA strands of the same DNA fragment and use that information to group the mapped reads. But I can't seem to find how that information is encoded within the UMI tags. In other words, how can which reads come from the same DNA fragment but opposite strands since they have different UMI tags?

    Below is the pipeline I was using to process the data. I am using gatk (Picard) and fgbio and I was ignoring any "duplex" DNA information as I do not know how to identify or group reads that "come" from the same DNA fragment. In particular, I was using GroupReadsByUmi with the "adjacency" option, not paired as I didn't have UMI tags in the format described in fgbio docs (e.g. ACGT-CCGG) and CallMolecularConsensusReads (instead of CallDuplexConsensusReads).

    Anybody can give any clues on how to approach this? Thanks in advance for you help.

    ##Generate read alignments andUMIs
    #"Read trimming".
    # e.g.
    trim_galore --fastqc --paired --cores 4 --gzip --output_dir /scratch/groups/hodgkinsonlab/gcarbajo/projects/ctDNA/analysis/trimgalore/001MS /scratch/groups/hodgkinsonlab/gcarbajo/projects/ctDNA/data/ctDNA_IBIMA/HUMfeqzR/001MS/*_1.fq.gz /scratch/groups/hodgkinsonlab/gcarbajo/projects/ctDNA/data/ctDNA_IBIMA/HUMfeqzR/001MS/*_2.fq.gz
    # Filter the UMI file to keep only the UMIs for the reads that passed the trimming
    # Custom perl script that keeps the IDs for reads that pass the trimming
    # Generate and "unmapped bam" with Fastq2Bam. Based on (https://github.com/fulcrumgenomics/f...ead-Structures ) to codify the barcode (10M)

    e.g.
    fgbio FastqToBam -i ../analysis/trimgalore/001MS/*val_1.fq.gz ../analysis/trimgalore/001MS/*val_2.fq.gz 001MS.trimmed.UMIs.fq.gz -o /dev/stdout --read-structures +T +T 10M --sample=001MS --library=001MS | samtools sort -n - |samtools view -Sb - > ../analysis/unmappedBamWithUMIs/001MS.unmapWUMI.srt.v3.bam
    # Map the reads with BWA ( piping amToFastq, bwa y MergeBamAlignment)
    # e.g.
    # Map it and merge with the UMIS
    gatk --java-options -Xmx32g SamToFastq -I ../analysis/unmappedBamWithUMIs/001MS.unmapWUMI.srt.v3.bam -F /dev/stdout -INTERLEAVE true | bwa mem -p -t 8 /mnt/lustre/groups/hodgkinsonlab/gcarbajo/annotation/hsapiens/hg38/GCA_000001405.15/GRCh38_no_alt_analysis_set_GCA_000001405.15.fasta.gz /dev/stdin | samtools sort -n - | samtools view -Sb - | gatk --java-options -Xmx32g MergeBamAlignment -UNMAPPED ../analysis/unmappedBamWithUMIs/001MS.unmapWUMI.srt.v3.bam -ALIGNED /dev/stdin -O ../analysis/mappedBamWithUMIs/001MS.mappedWUMI.v3.bam -R /mnt/lustre/groups/hodgkinsonlab/gcarbajo/annotation/hsapiens/hg38/GCA_000001405.15/GRCh38_no_alt_analysis_set_GCA_000001405.15.fasta.gz -SO coordinate -ALIGNER_PROPER_PAIR_FLAGS true -MAX_GAPS -1 -ORIENTATIONS FR -VALIDATION_STRINGENCY SILENT -CREATE_INDEX true

    # Genrate consensus reads using "Adjacency" (details here: https://genome.cshlp.org/content/27/3/491.full)

    #e.g.
    fgbio GroupReadsByUmi -s Adjacency -i ../analysis/mappedBamWithUMIs/001MS.mappedWUMI.v3.bam -o ../analysis/GroupedReadsByUmi/001MS.mappedWUMI.v3.gbu.bam -f ../analysis/GroupedReadsByUmi/001MS.mappedWUMI.v3.gbu.hist.txt > logs/001MS.GroupReadsByUmi.out 2>logs/001MS.GroupReadsByUmi.err

    #Generate consensus sequences:
    #e.g.
    fgbio CallMolecularConsensusReads --input ../analysis/GroupedReadsByUmi/001MS.mappedWUMI.v3.gbu.bam --output ../analysis/CallMolecularConsensusReads/001MS.mappedWUMI.v3.gbu.cons_unmap.bam --min-reads=1 --reject ../analysis/CallMolecularConsensusReads/001MS.mappedWUMI.v3.gbu.cons_rej.bam > logs/001MS_CallMolecularConsensusReads.out 2>logs/001MS_CallMolecularConsensusReads.error


    #Map consensus.
    #e.g.
    gatk --java-options -Xmx32g SamToFastq -RGT A -I ../analysis/CallMolecularConsensusReads/001MS.mappedWUMI.v3.gbu.cons_unmap.bam -F /dev/stdout -INTERLEAVE true | bwa mem -p -t 8 /mnt/lustre/groups/hodgkinsonlab/gcarbajo/annotation/hsapiens/hg38/GCA_000001405.15/GRCh38_no_alt_analysis_set_GCA_000001405.15.fasta.gz /dev/stdin | gatk SortSam -I /dev/stdin -O /dev/stdout -SO queryname | samtools view -Sb - | gatk --java-options -Xmx32g MergeBamAlignment -UNMAPPED ../analysis/CallMolecularConsensusReads/001MS.mappedWUMI.v3.gbu.cons_unmap.bam -ALIGNED /dev/stdin -O ../analysis/consensusAligned/001MS.mappedWUMI.v3.bam -R /mnt/lustre/groups/hodgkinsonlab/gcarbajo/annotation/hsapiens/hg38/GCA_000001405.15/GRCh38_no_alt_analysis_set_GCA_000001405.15.fasta.gz -SO coordinate -ALIGNER_PROPER_PAIR_FLAGS true -MAX_GAPS -1 -ORIENTATIONS FR -VALIDATION_STRINGENCY SILENT -CREATE_INDEX true
    Filtra las secuencias consenso (aquí me quedo con familias de 2 o más pero también he probado de 3)
    Por ejemplo:
    fgbio FilterConsensusReads -M 2 -N 30 -i ../analysis/consensusAligned/001MS.mappedWUMI.v3.bam -o ../analysis/FilterConsensusReads/001MS.mappedWUMI.v3.FCons.min2.bam -r /mnt/lustre/groups/hodgkinsonlab/gcarbajo/annotation/hsapiens/hg38/GCA_000001405.15/GRCh38_no_alt_analysis_set_GCA_000001405.15.fasta.gz > logs/001MS.FilterConsensusReads.min2.out 2> logs/001MS.FilterConsensusReads.min2.err

    "Call variants" con Mutect2
    Cortar las secuencias en las que se solapan las reads FW y reverse para solo contar una vez por fragmento
    Por ejemplo:
    fgbio ClipBam -Xmx32000M --clip-overlapping-reads -i ../analysis/FilterConsensusReads/001MS.mappedWUMI.v3.FCons.min2.bam -o ../analysis/ClipBam/001MS.mappedWUMI.v3.FCons.min2.clip.bam -m ../analysis/ClipBam/001MS.mappedWUMI.v3.FCons.min2.clip.metrics.txt -r /mnt/lustre/groups/hodgkinsonlab/gcarbajo/annotation/hsapiens/hg38/GCA_000001405.15/GRCh38_no_alt_analysis_set_GCA_000001405.15.fasta.gz > logs/001MS.ClipBam.out 2> logs/001MS.ClipBam.err
    Detectar variantes:
    Por ejemplo:
    gatk Mutect2 -R /mnt/lustre/groups/hodgkinsonlab/gcarbajo/annotation/hsapiens/hg38/GCA_000001405.15/GRCh38_no_alt_analysis_set_GCA_000001405.15.fasta -I ../analysis/ClipBam/001MS.mappedWUMI.v3.FCons.min2.clip.bam -L ../data/bed_files/list.interval_list --germline-resource ../data/gatk-best-practices/somatic-hg38_af-only-gnomad.hg38.vcf.gz --panel-of-normals ../data/gatk-best-practices/somatic-hg38_1000g_pon.hg38.vcf.gz -O ../analysis/Mutecc2/001MS.min2.clip.vcf.gz > logs/001MS.mutect.min2.clip.out 2> logs/001MS.mutect.min2.clip.errh

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • seqadmin
    Advanced Tools Transforming the Field of Cytogenomics
    by seqadmin


    At the intersection of cytogenetics and genomics lies the exciting field of cytogenomics. It focuses on studying chromosomes at a molecular scale, involving techniques that analyze either the whole genome or particular DNA sequences to examine variations in structure and behavior at the chromosomal or subchromosomal level. By integrating cytogenetic techniques with genomic analysis, researchers can effectively investigate chromosomal abnormalities related to diseases, particularly...
    09-26-2023, 06:26 AM
  • seqadmin
    How RNA-Seq is Transforming Cancer Studies
    by seqadmin



    Cancer research has been transformed through numerous molecular techniques, with RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) playing a crucial role in understanding the complexity of the disease. Maša Ivin, Ph.D., Scientific Writer at Lexogen, and Yvonne Goepel Ph.D., Product Manager at Lexogen, remarked that “The high-throughput nature of RNA-seq allows for rapid profiling and deep exploration of the transcriptome.” They emphasized its indispensable role in cancer research, aiding in biomarker...
    09-07-2023, 11:15 PM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by seqadmin, Yesterday, 09:36 AM
0 responses
8 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 10-02-2023, 07:14 AM
0 responses
15 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 09-29-2023, 09:38 AM
0 responses
16 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 09-27-2023, 06:57 AM
0 responses
16 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Working...
X