Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • NGS_New_User
    replied
    Originally posted by GenoMax View Post
    With a clear problem like this your first stop of inquiry should be CLC tech support. Is this a Mac or a PC? Are we talking about the same exact data set (in terms of size at least).
    Thanks for the suggestion. I have just sent them an email, hopefully will get a response from them soon. It is a PC. Yes, the same exact data set

    Leave a comment:


  • GenoMax
    replied
    Originally posted by NGS_New_User View Post
    We have the same issue. CLC gwb version 5.5 was fast. We recently upgraded to version 6 and it was ok, but then after upgrading to version 6.0.3, it has become very slow. It freezes the whole computer, and takes almost 20 minutes to upload a file that only took 2 mins with version 5.
    With a clear problem like this your first stop of inquiry should be CLC tech support. Is this a Mac or a PC? Are we talking about the same exact data set (in terms of size at least).

    Leave a comment:


  • NGS_New_User
    replied
    Same problem here, did you find solution?

    Originally posted by Bioanalyst View Post
    The differences are by hours, infact twice the difference (~6 hours in 5.1 version and ~11 hours in Version 6) !

    Both the computer use the same kind of structure and configuration, infact the slower mapping is in a system which is more powerful than the other computer.

    Right now I am trying to download the legacy version (Version 5.1) in the same computer and would do a comparison between the versions within the same system.
    We have the same issue. CLC gwb version 5.5 was fast. We recently upgraded to version 6 and it was ok, but then after upgrading to version 6.0.3, it has become very slow. It freezes the whole computer, and takes almost 20 minutes to upload a file that only took 2 mins with version 5.

    Did you get a solution to the problem? I checked their website and there is a new version v6.0.4 for upgrade, have you tried this new upgrade?
    Any info will be helpful, Thanks!

    Leave a comment:


  • Bucky
    replied
    For us it was the exact opposite: mapping in v5 took forever (much longer than in v4), but v6 was fast again (and still is). weird

    Leave a comment:


  • Bioanalyst
    replied
    The differences are by hours, infact twice the difference (~6 hours in 5.1 version and ~11 hours in Version 6) !

    Both the computer use the same kind of structure and configuration, infact the slower mapping is in a system which is more powerful than the other computer.

    Right now I am trying to download the legacy version (Version 5.1) in the same computer and would do a comparison between the versions within the same system.
    Last edited by Bioanalyst; 02-26-2013, 07:44 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • GenoMax
    replied
    What kind to difference are we talking about here? Minutes/hours?

    Benchmarking software versions is something only the vendors probably care about, mainly for marketing purposes.

    If you are convinced that this is an issue restricted to CLC version 6 (and not 5.x) then you may want to check in with CLC tech support.

    Leave a comment:


  • CLC-Genomics - Version 6 apparently runs slower than V5

    Dear All, for some strange reasons, in our lab, we find CLC's latest version 6 runs slower than v5 for the same parameter of Reference based mapping. Version 6 in general claims to be much much faster than Version5...Anyone else facing similar issues?? any solution..shed some lights on it..

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • seqadmin
    Essential Discoveries and Tools in Epitranscriptomics
    by seqadmin




    The field of epigenetics has traditionally concentrated more on DNA and how changes like methylation and phosphorylation of histones impact gene expression and regulation. However, our increased understanding of RNA modifications and their importance in cellular processes has led to a rise in epitranscriptomics research. “Epitranscriptomics brings together the concepts of epigenetics and gene expression,” explained Adrien Leger, PhD, Principal Research Scientist...
    04-22-2024, 07:01 AM
  • seqadmin
    Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
    by seqadmin


    Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
    04-04-2024, 04:25 PM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by seqadmin, Today, 08:47 AM
0 responses
12 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
0 responses
60 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
0 responses
59 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
0 responses
54 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Working...
X