Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • TheSeqGeek
    Member
    • Feb 2014
    • 40

    #1

    How DESeq2 Handles counts

    Hypothetically

    If I have 24 samples and I submit them to a facility to run my RNA-seq then can this happen?

    The technician puts in varying amount of prepped library into the lanes so how does DESeq2 account for this variability in it's normalization?

    If I put in 20 ng if DNA in lane one and 50 ng in lane 2 how is this accounted for by the software or is this something I should be aware of and account for by myself.
  • dpryan
    Devon Ryan
    • Jul 2011
    • 3478

    #2
    The normal packages (DESeq2, edgeR, etc.) will deal with this just fine and it's not something you normally need to concern yourself with. The method used in DESeq2 was described in the original DESeq paper (the end of page 2 and the beginning of page 3).

    Having said that, it's often good to have a look at the size factors. It's sometimes the case that if that of one sample differs by 10x or more from the others that you get spurious results.

    Comment

    • TheSeqGeek
      Member
      • Feb 2014
      • 40

      #3
      Originally posted by dpryan View Post
      The normal packages (DESeq2, edgeR, etc.) will deal with this just fine and it's not something you normally need to concern yourself with. The method used in DESeq2 was described in the original DESeq paper (the end of page 2 and the beginning of page 3).

      Having said that, it's often good to have a look at the size factors. It's sometimes the case that if that of one sample differs by 10x or more from the others that you get spurious results.
      thanks you have been a great PI in my research so far


      quick code in R for size factors?

      Comment

      • dpryan
        Devon Ryan
        • Jul 2011
        • 3478

        #4
        Code:
        sizeFactors(dds)
        where "dds" is a "DESeqDataSet" object.

        Comment

        • TheSeqGeek
          Member
          • Feb 2014
          • 40

          #5
          excellent thank you

          size factors are around 0.9 - 1.1 bla bla bla

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • kinpict.com
            Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
            by kinpict.com
            The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
            Today, 06:37 PM
          • SEQadmin2
            16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
            by SEQadmin2





            NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
            10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
          0 responses
          27 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
          0 responses
          35 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
          2 responses
          56 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post kinpict.com  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
          0 responses
          175 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...