Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • bbwrap.sh, is output OK?

    Hi all,

    I have a library sequenced two times in paierd-end mode.

    I have used bbwrap.sh

    ~/bin/bbmap/bbwrap.sh -in1=hds1r1_09clean.fastq.gz,hds1r1_26clean.fastq.gz -in2=hds1r2_09clean.fastq.gz,hds1r2_26clean.fastq.gz path=/media/mj/c8e2ccd2-6313-4092-be34-46144891720f/agp_v5 unpigz=t pigz=t threads=24 -Xmx100g outm=s68_to_b73v5.bam showprogress=250000 statsfile=stats_s68_to_b73v5 covstats=covstats_s68_to_b73v5

    If I understand correctly it is possible to provide paired files in -in and -in2

    The procedure proceeded ok, like bbmap.sh, after processing the first pair it printed info, which I expected:

    ------------------ Results ------------------

    Genome: 1
    Key Length: 13
    Max Indel: 16000
    Minimum Score Ratio: 0.56
    Mapping Mode: normal

    Reads: 461959640
    Mapped reads: 455488907
    Mapped bases: 44824369462
    Ref scaffolds: 685
    Ref bases: 2182075994

    Percent mapped: 98.599
    Percent proper pairs: 80.240
    Average coverage: 20.542
    Average coverage with deletions: 27.430
    Standard deviation: 111.219
    Percent scaffolds with any coverage: 100.00
    Percent of reference bases covered: 98.53

    Total time: 393719.639 seconds.

    And later:

    Executing align2.BBMap [build=1, overwrite=true, fastareadlen=500, unpigz=t, pigz=t, threads=24, showprogress=250000, statsfile=stats_s68_to_b73v5, covstats=covstats_s68_to_b73v5, indexloaded=t, in=hds1r1_26clean.fastq.gz, in2=hds1r2_26clean.fastq.gz]
    Version 38.90

    Set threads to 24
    Retaining first best site only for ambiguous mappings.
    No output file.
    Cleared Memory: 0.308 seconds.
    Processing reads in paired-ended mode.
    Started read stream.
    Started 24 mapping threads.
    ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................Detecting finished threads: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23

    ------------------ Results ------------------

    Genome: 1
    Key Length: 13
    Max Indel: 16000
    Minimum Score Ratio: 0.56
    Mapping Mode: normal

    Total time: 381683.967 seconds.


    I'm surprised to see "No output file." in the messages above. Also the entire output ended with "total time" and no statistics as for the first read-pair.

    So in the end I wonder if my resulting file is ok (I used outm to get only mapped reads). I.e. does it contain mapped reads from all four files?

    I don't want to test if, for example merged file from separate runs of bbmap for both pairs would give the same number of mapped reads. It would take too much time.
    bbwrap seems ok, but from my point of view it is not enough documented.

  • #2
    You can't use `-in1=` those options are simply `in1=` and `in2=` etc. You should also use `out=` not `outm=` if you are writing an alignment file.
    Code:
    bbwrap.sh in1=read1.fq,singleton.fq in2=read2.fq,null out=mapped.sam append

    Comment


    • #3
      Thanks,

      so can I write:

      bbwrap.sh in1=hds1r1_09clean.fastq.gz,hds1r1_26clean.fastq.gz in2=hds1r2_09clean.fastq.gz,hds1r2_26clean.fastq.gz ... out=s68_to_b73v5.bam

      ?

      Why I have to use "out" but not "outm"? I want to retain only mapped reads, to keep my file as small as possible.

      It is also interesting, why bbwrap haven't alert that options such as "-in1" are invalid. Some output file has been written but I don't know if it is valid. At least bamqc accepted that file. Nevertheless I'd rather want properly generated file, even if it means that I have to wait for it ten days.
      Last edited by floem7; 05-18-2021, 01:02 PM.

      Comment


      • #4
        That would be fine. Looks like you can use `outm=` if you need just mapped reads. I have normally used `out=` with `mappedonly=t` but those two look to be equivalent.

        It should not take 10 days to complete an analysis unless you have a huge dataset.

        Comment


        • #5
          Ok, thanks. I have huge dataset so I will have to wait for results.

          Comment


          • #6
            So my mapping crashed. Here is my command:
            ~/bin/bbmap/bbwrap.sh in1=hds1r1_09clean.fastq.gz,hds1r1_26clean.fastq.gz in2=hds1r2_09clean.fastq.gz,hds1r2_26clean.fastq.gz path=/media/mj/c8e2ccd2-6313-4092-be34-46144891720f/agp_v5 unpigz=t pigz=t threads=24 -Xmx100g outm=s68_to_b73v5.bam append showprogress=250000 statsfile=stats_s68_to_b73v5 covstats=covstats_s68_to_b73v5 bs=bs.sh

            Here is the error message
            [E::sam_parse1] no SQ lines present in the header
            samtools view: error reading file "-"
            Exception in thread "Thread-46" java.lang.RuntimeException: java.io.IOException: Przerwany potok
            at stream.ReadStreamByteWriter.run(ReadStreamByteWriter.java:32)
            Caused by: java.io.IOException: Przerwany potok
            at java.base/java.io.FileOutputStream.writeBytes(Native Method)
            at java.base/java.io.FileOutputStream.write(FileOutputStream.java:354)
            at java.base/java.io.BufferedOutputStream.write(BufferedOutputStream.java:123)
            at stream.ReadStreamByteWriter.writeSam(ReadStreamByteWriter.java:659)
            at stream.ReadStreamByteWriter.processJobs(ReadStreamByteWriter.java:93)
            at stream.ReadStreamByteWriter.run2(ReadStreamByteWriter.java:42)
            at stream.ReadStreamByteWriter.run(ReadStreamByteWriter.java:28)
            Exception in thread "Thread-49" java.lang.RuntimeException: Writing to a terminated thread.
            at stream.ConcurrentGenericReadOutputStream.write(ConcurrentGenericReadOutputStream.java:202)
            at stream.ConcurrentGenericReadOutputStream.addDisordered(ConcurrentGenericReadOutputStream.java:197)
            at stream.ConcurrentGenericReadOutputStream.add(ConcurrentGenericReadOutputStream.java:97)
            at align2.AbstractMapThread.writeList(AbstractMapThread.java:625)
            at align2.AbstractMapThread.run(AbstractMapThread.java:591)
            MORE REPETITIONS OF SIMILAR BLOCKS

            **************************************************************************
            Warning! 24 mapping threads did not terminate normally.
            Check the error log; the output may be corrupt or incomplete.
            Please submit the full stderr output as a bug report, not just this message.
            **************************************************************************
            I don't have to necesarily use bbwrap, I just wanted to make mapping in elegant way.
            So just to make sure, could I map first pair and second pair of read separately with bbmap and then merge the results (bam files)? I don't have time for more tries, I have been waiting five days for this error.

            Comment


            • #7
              Ok, so I've found samtools merge.

              Comment


              • #8
                You need to map paired end files together before merging the resulting alignment files using samtools merge.

                Comment

                Latest Articles

                Collapse

                • seqadmin
                  Quality Control Essentials for Next-Generation Sequencing Workflows
                  by seqadmin




                  Like all molecular biology applications, next-generation sequencing (NGS) workflows require diligent quality control (QC) measures to ensure accurate and reproducible results. Proper QC begins at nucleic acid extraction and continues all the way through to data analysis. This article outlines the key QC steps in an NGS workflow, along with the commonly used tools and techniques.

                  Nucleic Acid Quality Control
                  Preparing for NGS starts with isolating the...
                  02-10-2025, 01:58 PM
                • seqadmin
                  An Introduction to the Technologies Transforming Precision Medicine
                  by seqadmin


                  In recent years, precision medicine has become a major focus for researchers and healthcare professionals. This approach offers personalized treatment and wellness plans by utilizing insights from each person's unique biology and lifestyle to deliver more effective care. Its advancement relies on innovative technologies that enable a deeper understanding of individual variability. In a joint documentary with our colleagues at Biocompare, we examined the foundational principles of precision...
                  01-27-2025, 07:46 AM

                ad_right_rmr

                Collapse

                News

                Collapse

                Topics Statistics Last Post
                Started by seqadmin, 02-07-2025, 09:30 AM
                0 responses
                54 views
                0 likes
                Last Post seqadmin  
                Started by seqadmin, 02-05-2025, 10:34 AM
                0 responses
                85 views
                0 likes
                Last Post seqadmin  
                Started by seqadmin, 02-03-2025, 09:07 AM
                0 responses
                68 views
                0 likes
                Last Post seqadmin  
                Started by seqadmin, 01-31-2025, 08:31 AM
                0 responses
                44 views
                0 likes
                Last Post seqadmin  
                Working...
                X