Dear all,
I am working on The Universal Tailed Amplicon Sequencing but I am stuck in understanding the fundamentals of the Titanium Chemistry in Library preparation.
From Roche Handouts (Guidelines for Amplicon Experimental Design), there is a discrepancy between the versions:
May 2010
The 3’-portion of each primer is designed to anneal with the universal tails added to either side of the target of interest on the DNA sample. Their sequence, therefore, must be the complement of the Univ-A and Univ-B sequences. They are marked as Univ-A’ and Univ-B’, and shown on {indigo} or {blue} background in Figure 7.
Mar 2012
The 3’-portion of each primer is designed to anneal with the complementary strand of the universal tails added to either side of the target of interest on the DNA sample. Their sequence, therefore, must be the same as the Univ-A and Univ-B sequences (exact same sequences; not the complements nor the reverse-complements). They are marked as Univ-A and Univ-B, and shown on {indigo} or {blue} background in Figure 7.
Does anyone know which one is the correct one? If Mar 2012 version is correct, can anyone explain what is happening in the second PCR reaction and how does each strand ended up with two adaptors?
Many many thanks!!!
I am working on The Universal Tailed Amplicon Sequencing but I am stuck in understanding the fundamentals of the Titanium Chemistry in Library preparation.
From Roche Handouts (Guidelines for Amplicon Experimental Design), there is a discrepancy between the versions:
May 2010
The 3’-portion of each primer is designed to anneal with the universal tails added to either side of the target of interest on the DNA sample. Their sequence, therefore, must be the complement of the Univ-A and Univ-B sequences. They are marked as Univ-A’ and Univ-B’, and shown on {indigo} or {blue} background in Figure 7.
Mar 2012
The 3’-portion of each primer is designed to anneal with the complementary strand of the universal tails added to either side of the target of interest on the DNA sample. Their sequence, therefore, must be the same as the Univ-A and Univ-B sequences (exact same sequences; not the complements nor the reverse-complements). They are marked as Univ-A and Univ-B, and shown on {indigo} or {blue} background in Figure 7.
Does anyone know which one is the correct one? If Mar 2012 version is correct, can anyone explain what is happening in the second PCR reaction and how does each strand ended up with two adaptors?
Many many thanks!!!
Comment