Has anyone else been experiencing problems with titanium emPCR? We have been having a lot of failed runs that can't be attributed to sequencing problems...the control fragments look fine. The emPCR seems to go fine...we get an enriched recovery within the normal range, but then the sequencing is an utter failure, apart from the control reads of course. This is happening across multiple library types (standard shotgun Titanium Paired End Titanium), and from samples of different types from different sources. We haven't changed our library prep approach recently, so we keep focusing on the emPCR as the potential problem. We have heard that Roche has started using a new vendor for their emPCR additive and are wondering if this is related, but can't get confirmation from Roche. Anyone else seeing this?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
-
emPCR problems
Yes, we have - we were told they are 'unseen broken reactors', meaning that even though these were inspected at emPCR completion and found to be non- biphasic (ie not obviously broken) that there can be broken reactors that are not visibly biphasic.
We have not seen this in FLX chemistry only Ti chemistry.
It is a major bummer.
Comment
-
we had a similar problem with specifically SVE setups, where we were seeing a ton of broken wells and poor enrichments. it turned out to not only be an oil lot problem, but an oil problem that spanned across two separate oil lots. it was really hard to diagnose. we ended up switching to the newest lot available and it solved the problem.
Comment
-
I ve been having a problem with emPCR as well with the enrichment step. I used the same reagents and one LV oil from the same kits to process two different samples. During the enrichment step, there has been a bit of a problem in washing away of the sequencing beads "6-10" times that are not bound to the enrichment beads.
one sample was enriched and processed fine during this stage, only requiring about 10 washes until no more white sequencing beads were being washed out. The second sample however kept releasing the unbound white beads even after 30-40 washes. The input of the library I put into emPCR was very low so I know this was probably not due to having too much template to start with. Anyone having this similar problem or can speculate as to why this may be? This has happened to a few of other samples as well.. thanks!
Comment
-
no, my problem is usually the opposite where too little beads are being washed off even though very small amount of template beads were added in the first place. If they are all being washed off and you have done everything else properly upto this point, your enrichment primer may not have bound properly to your DNA which means they just cant bind to the enrichment beads. Check the status of your adaptors as wells as your enrichment primers... ?
Comment
-
There is clearly a reagent problem with emPCR reagents of late. Even libraries that we have previously run do not perform well using recent lots of SV emPCR reagents. This is less true of LV emPCR but it has also been somewhat problem. I understand from our Roche rep that they are undertaking a "reformulation" of the SV kits right now and have already done so for the LV emPCR kits, that is supposed to reduce the inter-kit variability in success.
On another thread I have seen reports that the problem is even worse for Lib-A kits than Lib-L.
Comment
-
Latest Articles
Collapse
-
by seqadmin
The recent pandemic caused worldwide health, economic, and social disruptions with its reverberations still felt today. A key takeaway from this event is the need for accurate and accessible tools for detecting and tracking infectious diseases. Timely identification is essential for early intervention, managing outbreaks, and preventing their spread. This article reviews several valuable tools employed in the detection and surveillance of infectious diseases.
...-
Channel: Articles
11-27-2023, 01:15 PM -
ad_right_rmr
Collapse
News
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by seqadmin, 12-08-2023, 10:35 AM
|
0 responses
16 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
12-08-2023, 10:35 AM
|
||
Started by seqadmin, 12-05-2023, 02:24 PM
|
0 responses
18 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
12-05-2023, 02:24 PM
|
||
Started by seqadmin, 12-05-2023, 07:37 AM
|
0 responses
30 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
12-05-2023, 07:37 AM
|
||
Started by seqadmin, 12-04-2023, 08:23 AM
|
0 responses
15 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
12-04-2023, 08:23 AM
|
Comment