Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • GenoMax
    replied
    Originally posted by cbrennan View Post
    Just got the following response from Illumina:

    Currently, bustard.py is not compatible with RTA 1.12 data. You can work around the .clocs vs .locs issue by specifying "posSuffix=.clocs" when evoking 'make', i.e. the command would be

    make -j [n] posSuffix=.clocs

    Also, please be aware that this version of Bustard uses different qtables from those optimized for the latest TruSeq v3 chemistry, so your quality scores will be slightly different from those produced by RTA 1.12

    There will be a new release of OLB, version 1.9.3, coming out very shortly which will be compatible with the latest RTA and sequencing chemistry.

    It's running now....seems to be chugging along ok
    Has doing this resulted in quality scores >40 (e.g. i)? Can you check in your sequence files?

    EDIT: We just heard from illumina that the new v.3 sequencing kits have had the quality range extended. The quality table for the new, v3 kits has a range from “B” to “m”.
    Last edited by GenoMax; 06-27-2011, 12:05 PM. Reason: Additional info

    Leave a comment:


  • cbrennan
    replied
    Just got the following response from Illumina:

    Currently, bustard.py is not compatible with RTA 1.12 data. You can work around the .clocs vs .locs issue by specifying "posSuffix=.clocs" when evoking 'make', i.e. the command would be

    make -j [n] posSuffix=.clocs

    Also, please be aware that this version of Bustard uses different qtables from those optimized for the latest TruSeq v3 chemistry, so your quality scores will be slightly different from those produced by RTA 1.12

    There will be a new release of OLB, version 1.9.3, coming out very shortly which will be compatible with the latest RTA and sequencing chemistry.

    It's running now....seems to be chugging along ok

    Leave a comment:


  • cbrennan
    replied
    Originally posted by kets View Post
    The way I understand it, OLB 1.9 should be able to use your clocs files directly.

    "Important Changes in OLB v1.9:
    Supports formatted (_pos.txt), binary (.locs), or compressed binary (.clocs) position
    files."

    See the user guide for the following options:

    -p, --positions-directory
    -P, --positions-format
    Yeah, that's what the guide says, but when I tried the -P and/or --positions-format option OLB errors with 'Failed to parse command-line options' and if you run bustard.py --help neither of those options are listed as valid. I think it only works if you're running the BclConverter

    Leave a comment:


  • kets
    replied
    The way I understand it, OLB 1.9 should be able to use your clocs files directly.

    "Important Changes in OLB v1.9:
    Supports formatted (_pos.txt), binary (.locs), or compressed binary (.clocs) position
    files."

    See the user guide for the following options:

    -p, --positions-directory
    -P, --positions-format

    Leave a comment:


  • cbrennan
    started a topic .clocs format

    .clocs format

    Does anyone know how to convert the .clocs files to .locs files?

    We're running a HiSeq2000 100X100 with RTA 1.12.4 RTA failed to generate .bcl files for read 2, so I am attempting to run OLB-1.9.0 bustard.py from .cifs to generate basecalls. However this version of RTA generates .clocs files and OLB needs .locs files.

    The manual states the .clocs file is a compressed version of the .locs file, but does not give any details on type of compression or how to uncompress. I have e-mailed our FAS & tech support but am told it may be a couple of days before there is an answer. I was hoping someone here has some ideas....

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • seqadmin
    Non-Coding RNA Research and Technologies
    by seqadmin




    Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) do not code for proteins but play important roles in numerous cellular processes including gene silencing, developmental pathways, and more. There are numerous types including microRNA (miRNA), long ncRNA (lncRNA), circular RNA (circRNA), and more. In this article, we discuss innovative ncRNA research and explore recent technological advancements that improve the study of ncRNAs.

    Nobel Prize for MicroRNA Discovery
    This week,...
    10-07-2024, 08:07 AM
  • seqadmin
    Recent Developments in Metagenomics
    by seqadmin





    Metagenomics has improved the way researchers study microorganisms across diverse environments. Historically, studying microorganisms relied on culturing them in the lab, a method that limits the investigation of many species since most are unculturable1. Metagenomics overcomes these issues by allowing the study of microorganisms regardless of their ability to be cultured or the environments they inhabit. Over time, the field has evolved, especially with the advent...
    09-23-2024, 06:35 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by seqadmin, Yesterday, 02:44 PM
0 responses
7 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 10-11-2024, 06:55 AM
0 responses
14 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 10-02-2024, 04:51 AM
0 responses
110 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 10-01-2024, 07:10 AM
0 responses
117 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Working...
X