Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • yaximik
    replied
    Originally posted by GenoMax View Post
    Here is an example cost estimator you can try (without having to contact anyone): [url]https://dugsim.net/estimate_cost[/url
    Well, that site does not provide the option I need, and when I tried to contact them by e-mail my request like went into a black hole. That sucks...

    But the opp to get multiple quoting is interesting, thanks!

    Leave a comment:


  • AllSeq
    replied
    Originally posted by SNPsaurus View Post
    yaximik, you can provide custom sequencing primers for single lanes of a HiSeq 2000. We do it all the time for our nextRAD markers. The University of Oregon sequencing facility is used to custom jobs, so check with them (http://htseq.uoregon.edu/).
    SNPsaurus is right - you can't share lanes with anyone, but you don't necessarily need to buy an entire flow cell (just depends on how much coverage you want). We'd be happy to help you find the right provider - just let me know.

    Shawn
    www.allseq.com

    Leave a comment:


  • SNPsaurus
    replied
    yaximik, you can provide custom sequencing primers for single lanes of a HiSeq 2000. We do it all the time for our nextRAD markers. The University of Oregon sequencing facility is used to custom jobs, so check with them (http://htseq.uoregon.edu/).

    Leave a comment:


  • GenoMax
    replied
    Originally posted by yaximik View Post
    So what average cost I should expect from a commercial provider (I need only fastq datasets)?
    Here is an example cost estimator you can try (without having to contact anyone): https://dugsim.net/estimate_cost

    Following sites give you access to multiple providers for quotes:

    AllSeq: http://www.allseq.com/
    Genohub: https://genohub.com/
    Last edited by GenoMax; 01-08-2014, 11:18 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • yaximik
    replied
    After looking through this thread I am still at loss as to what is the cost of the entire run on 2500 or 2000. My problem is that my libraries have to be sequenced with my custom sequencing primers, that is my samples cannot be pooled with other samples that use standard sequencing primers. The libraries run fine on MiSeq (2x100 PE) with these custom sequencing primers, but I need a much higher output than a few gigs per run. Thus, for 2500 I would nee to buy a two lane run, but on 2000 I would have to buy an 8-lane run, correct? So what average cost I should expect from a commercial provider (I need only fastq datasets)?

    Leave a comment:


  • ymc
    replied
    Originally posted by HMorrison View Post
    These are the costs for the '2' lane (single sample) flow cell, in rapid mode run--39 hrs for 2x150. MiSeq equivalent. By our calculations, it costs more, but makes operation more flexible--hard on users who want short, single reads to have to go in on 2x100 nt run and be charged accordingly.

    Hilary
    How to calculate the per run cost? Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • aperera
    replied
    We just got our machine upgraded to a 2500. Validation runs went great and we will be running two FCs today on Rapid Mode! Nice not having to wait to fill FCs when odd read lengths are requested. There is data available on the Illumina BaseSpace for anyone to take a look.

    Cost is as below (list prices):
    SBS (50 cyc.) = $465
    CLuster kit for on-board clustering = $795
    cBOT clustering (additional) = $400

    So for a 50bp (2 lane) rapid run ~300 million reads
    If done on board = $1165
    If cBOT clustering done = $1660
    Per lane = $830

    For 100bp paired-end, kit prices are as blow:
    SBS (200 cyc.) = $1690
    CLuster kit for on-board clustering = $1225
    cBOT clustering (additional) = $400

    Leave a comment:


  • Patincle
    replied
    HiSeq 2500 units delivered

    Does anyone know how many hiseq2500 units have been delivered?
    Has BGI upgraded their 127 hiSeq 2000s? Anyone?

    Leave a comment:


  • HMorrison
    replied
    Originally posted by pmiguel View Post
    Apparently I miscalculated.
    Still I would pay 15% more to get a data set back in 27 hours, rather than 12 days.

    Hilary, what does the "same sample" comment in your spreadsheet mean? Are the 2 lanes in the flow cell loaded from a single source?

    --
    Phillip
    Yes, although there are two 'lanes' they have to be the same sample--I think loaded from the same port. Sorry for the delayed response. Have been fighting with the FLX (and about to give it up).

    Leave a comment:


  • james hadfield
    replied
    This is exacty what I have heard as well. The same pol of samples will need to be rn on both lanes of the 2 lane flowcell. Has anyone seen a flowcell yet? I mocked on up for my blog last year, but have not seen a real one yet.

    Leave a comment:


  • huguesparri
    replied
    Hilary, what does the "same sample" comment in your spreadsheet mean? Are the 2 lanes in the flow cell loaded from a single source?
    Yes, from what Illumina's told us earlier this year, clustering will be performed on the Hiseq2500 and the same sample (or pool of samples) will be sequenced on both lanes.
    I guess the sample (or pool of samples) will be loaded on the paired-end rack at the beginning of the run.

    Leave a comment:


  • james hadfield
    replied
    Hi all I think the clustering is going to need to make use of current fluidics. It would be surprising if the $50,000 cost included new fluidics. If this is the case then I am not sure there is space to squeeze in all the reagents necessary to perform different run types. I guess we'll have to wait and see.

    It would not be a big hardship to have to run the same run on both sides. The upgrade could be what many core facilities are looking for to get additional flexibility.

    I posted a bit about the Proton install at BCM and HiSeq 2500 rapid runs on my blog...http://core-genomics.blogspot.co.uk/...me-in-day.html

    Leave a comment:


  • pmiguel
    replied
    Apparently I miscalculated.
    Still I would pay 15% more to get a data set back in 27 hours, rather than 12 days.

    Hilary, what does the "same sample" comment in your spreadsheet mean? Are the 2 lanes in the flow cell loaded from a single source?

    --
    Phillip

    Leave a comment:


  • HESmith
    replied
    Our rep indicated a premium of ~15% per GB data vs. the HiSeq2000. That's exactly in line w/ HMorrison's prices, since it would take five runs (120GB per HiSeq2500) to equal a single HiSeq2000 (600 GB).

    Leave a comment:


  • HMorrison
    replied
    Originally posted by pmiguel View Post
    Well that would be great.
    But that would be a per lane reagent cost below that for a lane of HiSeq 2000 reagents. Since the amount of sequence generated per unit time is similar for a 2500 vs a 2000 flowcell, I will speculate that the person feeding you this information is wrong.
    But maybe Illumina is just planning to steal the wind from the Proton Torrent's sails. This would tend to have that effect.

    --
    Phillip
    These are the costs for the '2' lane (single sample) flow cell, in rapid mode run--39 hrs for 2x150. MiSeq equivalent. By our calculations, it costs more, but makes operation more flexible--hard on users who want short, single reads to have to go in on 2x100 nt run and be charged accordingly.

    Hilary
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • seqadmin
    Strategies for Sequencing Challenging Samples
    by seqadmin


    Despite advancements in sequencing platforms and related sample preparation technologies, certain sample types continue to present significant challenges that can compromise sequencing results. Pedro Echave, Senior Manager of the Global Business Segment at Revvity, explained that the success of a sequencing experiment ultimately depends on the amount and integrity of the nucleic acid template (RNA or DNA) obtained from a sample. “The better the quality of the nucleic acid isolated...
    03-22-2024, 06:39 AM
  • seqadmin
    Techniques and Challenges in Conservation Genomics
    by seqadmin



    The field of conservation genomics centers on applying genomics technologies in support of conservation efforts and the preservation of biodiversity. This article features interviews with two researchers who showcase their innovative work and highlight the current state and future of conservation genomics.

    Avian Conservation
    Matthew DeSaix, a recent doctoral graduate from Kristen Ruegg’s lab at The University of Colorado, shared that most of his research...
    03-08-2024, 10:41 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by seqadmin, Yesterday, 06:37 PM
0 responses
12 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, Yesterday, 06:07 PM
0 responses
10 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 03-22-2024, 10:03 AM
0 responses
52 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 03-21-2024, 07:32 AM
0 responses
68 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Working...
X