Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Cuffdiff-confidence interval

    Hi, everybody, I have a problem about cuffdiff. I used cuffdiff to test differential expression. However, I checked the "genes.fpkm_tracking". All the FPKM estimate have q1_conf_lo=0, and q1_conf_hi a big number, which means the 95% confidence interval are very large. It seems not reasonable. I am not sure if the test statistic is calculated by this intervals. If it is, then the number of the deferentially expressed genes would be smaller.

    I also try to use cufflinks to estimate the expression level. and "genes.fpkm_tracking" produced by cufflinks have reasonable intervals. I remember cuffdiff used cufflinks quantification engine. So they should have similar result, right? Anyone have any ideas for this problems?

    Thanks a lot

  • #2
    did you get any answer?

    ib

    Comment


    • #3
      did you find a solution? I have the same problem...

      ib

      Comment


      • #4
        No, I did not get reply.
        However, I think the variance difference is just caused by numerical reasons. Since I do not have experimental replicate, using cufflinks to estimate the expression only consider the variance from the model, such as the variation resulting from the assignment a read to which isoform or possion distribution. this variance do not have any biological meaning. The true variance should include both the model variance and the biological replicate variance.

        In cuffdiff, which compare expression difference from two samples/conditions. I believe it estimate the variance from two different samples/conditions. but in this case, the hypothesis that most genes have similar expression level is not necessarily hold. So I think that is the reason why the variance is larger in cuffdiff result.

        What's your opinion?

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • seqadmin
          Recent Developments in Metagenomics
          by seqadmin





          Metagenomics has improved the way researchers study microorganisms across diverse environments. Historically, studying microorganisms relied on culturing them in the lab, a method that limits the investigation of many species since most are unculturable1. Metagenomics overcomes these issues by allowing the study of microorganisms regardless of their ability to be cultured or the environments they inhabit. Over time, the field has evolved, especially with the advent...
          09-23-2024, 06:35 AM
        • seqadmin
          Understanding Genetic Influence on Infectious Disease
          by seqadmin




          During the COVID-19 pandemic, scientists observed that while some individuals experienced severe illness when infected with SARS-CoV-2, others were barely affected. These disparities left researchers and clinicians wondering what causes the wide variations in response to viral infections and what role genetics plays.

          Jean-Laurent Casanova, M.D., Ph.D., Professor at Rockefeller University, is a leading expert in this crossover between genetics and infectious...
          09-09-2024, 10:59 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by seqadmin, 10-02-2024, 04:51 AM
        0 responses
        13 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Started by seqadmin, 10-01-2024, 07:10 AM
        0 responses
        21 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Started by seqadmin, 09-30-2024, 08:33 AM
        0 responses
        25 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Started by seqadmin, 09-26-2024, 12:57 PM
        0 responses
        18 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Working...
        X