Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • shawn.mek
    replied
    Actually, yes they did get the older version for me and made it available temporarily. You can email them, and eventually, they will probably be able to put it somewhere for you to download. They were quite helpful.

    Leave a comment:


  • 8colorjino
    replied
    Hey, so did you get the older version of RefSeq release?
    Can I get the link of that?

    Leave a comment:


  • shawn.mek
    replied
    Well, I am reproducing the analysis that used 56, but then doing additional analysis using 56 to go along with the old analysis.

    If I use 57 to do the additional analysis I wouldn't have anything to compare it with. I guess I could do the old analysis with 57, but I'm not privy to exactly how that analysis was done I need to match my extended analysis to their old analysis (which was done with 56). Does that make sense?

    Argg. why isn't infinite disk space free, and every file persistent forever

    Leave a comment:


  • GenoMax
    replied
    Originally posted by shawn.mek View Post
    Any other possible workarounds you can think of?
    You have already alluded to what would need to be done in EDIT part of post #3. That would be a monumental undertaking at best and can't be really considered an "official" NCBI release 56 anyway.

    You obviously have a specific need for release 56 but while you are waiting for a source for 56 why not try and do the analysis against 57 and see if you can reconcile your results using the NCBI release/archive notes as to what changed between 56/57. Not knowing what kind of analysis you are trying to reproduce this suggestion may or may not be scientifically valid.

    Leave a comment:


  • shawn.mek
    replied
    Yeah, haven't heard back yet (it's been awhile), but will post later if they ever tell me anything.

    Any other possible workarounds you can think of?

    Leave a comment:


  • GenoMax
    replied
    Have you emailed NCBI support to check?

    Leave a comment:


  • shawn.mek
    replied
    No I actually need 56, to match what was done previously.

    I'm not as concerned with up to date information, I am concerned with reproducing something.

    I need those missing records, and I need to not have the new records in 57.

    EDIT
    With the catalog file you point to, I guess I could get rid of new info from 57, but I need all the gbff info for things that are now missing as well. Plus this introduces alot of work. I'm just wondering where a previous release might be found Surely the internet has it floating around somewhere, I guess not.
    Last edited by shawn.mek; 02-21-2013, 08:43 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • GenoMax
    replied
    Using version 57 should be fine. Refseq aims to provide stable sequence records. If you are not able to find something in release 57 then it may have been removed for a reason. You can find the records of removed accession numbers here: ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/refseq/removed/

    If you must have 56, archive info is available here: ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/refseq/re...talog/archive/
    Check the readme: ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/refseq/re...archive/README
    Last edited by GenoMax; 02-21-2013, 08:28 AM. Reason: Added info

    Leave a comment:


  • shawn.mek
    started a topic How do you download old RefSeq releases

    How do you download old RefSeq releases

    If I need to run analysis using a specific release version of Refseq, is there a place to download it (say release 56)?

    They are on release version 57 now, but I need my analysis to match someone else's analysis which used release version 56.

    Is there some workaround, if I can't download it anywhere? I have not been successful in finding an old mirror online yet. I have found really old versions like 45 and 8 in random places.

    Thanks

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • seqadmin
    Essential Discoveries and Tools in Epitranscriptomics
    by seqadmin




    The field of epigenetics has traditionally concentrated more on DNA and how changes like methylation and phosphorylation of histones impact gene expression and regulation. However, our increased understanding of RNA modifications and their importance in cellular processes has led to a rise in epitranscriptomics research. “Epitranscriptomics brings together the concepts of epigenetics and gene expression,” explained Adrien Leger, PhD, Principal Research Scientist...
    04-22-2024, 07:01 AM
  • seqadmin
    Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
    by seqadmin


    Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
    04-04-2024, 04:25 PM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by seqadmin, Yesterday, 11:49 AM
0 responses
15 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 04-24-2024, 08:47 AM
0 responses
16 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
0 responses
62 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
0 responses
60 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Working...
X