Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • CNVboy
    Member
    • Jun 2011
    • 27

    #1

    About script to combine steps of BWA

    For BWA, first do alignment (generate .sai), then sampe the paired-ends (generate .sam), then convert .sam to .bam. Now I'm going to write script to combine all these steps. ie, input is fastq, then output is .bam file.

    Now a big question is, I need to guarantee, say, the first step (generating .sai) is COMPLETE (instead of being aborted) before going to the second step; and the second step (generating .sam) before the third. I there any way to check that for BWA? Or what's the sign for the completeness of each step?

    btw, for combining of steps of BWA, I just need to put those three commands together? Or any other trick?

    thanks!
  • dp05yk
    Member
    • Dec 2010
    • 66

    #2
    Just write a shell script that calls your three commands in order... unless you are executing BWA on a server with a scheduler, in which case you can just submit all three commands independently with wait conditions.

    Comment

    • Jon_Keats
      Senior Member
      • Mar 2010
      • 279

      #3
      If you are looking for one to cut and paste there is one on my introduction thread that will take samples from fastq files straight to sorted bams with dupsmarked. It doesn't do a check for errors after each step, but others could likely suggest a simple method to capture if the exit status of the previous step. Generally, I've not had many issue with errors except when I messed up...

      Comment

      • gprakhar
        Member
        • Aug 2010
        • 78

        #4
        Hello CNVboy,

        If you are running your combined script on a Scheduler then, only problem with giving all the commands together is that you will get to know about the errors only at the end, that too only "IF" you are not keeping an eye on the log file.
        (use "$tail -f <filename>" for that, keep looking at it every 10-15 mins)
        I use SGE and just tail -f the err and out files

        Same way for running the script directly, only difference is your output is now the terminal and not a file.

        Hope this helps,
        prakhar

        Comment

        • CNVboy
          Member
          • Jun 2011
          • 27

          #5
          THanks everyone.

          I think the core question is: how can we guarantee the quality of the generated .sai, .sam file? How do you know the programming at this step is complete? Just look at the size of files; or ,say judge the quality of .sai file by checking if it can produce .sam file?

          For example, some of my .sai file looks good size-wise, but somehow cannot produce .sam file with correct size (.sam file is only 8.0kb); then I just reproduce .sai file, and it can generate .sam file with correct size.

          Also, seems BWA returns exit codes; can we use this as the sign of completeness of each step? And try to make it like, command 2 will execute only if command 1 runs successfully
          Last edited by CNVboy; 06-22-2011, 05:19 AM.

          Comment

          • dp05yk
            Member
            • Dec 2010
            • 66

            #6
            In my experience BWA won't really ever error out unless there's a problem with your data or your command (or lack of memory). As long as your data/commands are correct you can just use a shell script - command n in a shell script will wait until command (n - 1) is complete before running so you're guaranteed to start in the correct order.

            As far as you yourself knowing if the .sai stage is complete, just check your stderr output - if it says "n sequences have been processed", where n = the number of sequences in your FASTQ file, then it's complete. But the shell will check this for you if it's running a script.

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
              by SEQadmin2



              Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

              Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
              ...
              10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
              by SEQadmin2


              Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

              We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
              ...
              09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
            0 responses
            45 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
            0 responses
            34 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
            0 responses
            44 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
            0 responses
            45 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...