Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ndeshpan
    Member
    • Nov 2009
    • 29

    #1

    miRNA analysis

    Hi all,

    I am trying to work on a small RNA dataset generated using Illumina TruSeq™ Small RNA protocol.

    I have run the data through the various tools specialised for miRNA analysis (such as miRDEEP, miRAnalyser for miRNA identification and novel miRNA prediction),

    In addition to many reads hitting known mouse miRNAs, other ncRNAs and possible candidate miRNAs...

    *****
    I also ended up getting many reads (a big percentage) which align with the mouse genome :Both transcribed regions and unannotated regions.


    My first question is :
    Why should my reads have perfect (no bp mis-alignment) hits against mRNAs? Would these represent by-products of genes degradation (with the gene fragments in the acceptable length range around 25 nt) )? Any suggestions?

    These hits are present through out the genome and show similar presence (in terms of read coverage and read numbers) in most (if not all) places of the genome. So when I map the reads using bowtie against the genome ..I see a very similar pattern in both samples.

    Should I even consider checking a possible differential gradient for these reads between the two samples?

    Secondly:
    What are these reads hitting in big numbers against unannotated (mostly intronic regions!!) of the genome?

    Any ideas are welcome.

    cheers,

    Nandan
  • Kennels
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2011
    • 149

    #2
    A couple of questions:

    1. what sort of mRNAs are they aligning too? (randoms, or a particular kind?)

    2. i have read about miRNAs coming from introns, called miRTrons. Did you check about this?

    3. any thoughts about sample contamination or sample prep issues?

    edit: I guess the other question is, are the mRNA-hits targets of these miRNAs (even though you might expect some bp mismatches)
    Last edited by Kennels; 07-07-2011, 04:02 PM.

    Comment

    • petang
      Member
      • Nov 2008
      • 13

      #3
      Why should my reads have perfect (no bp mis-alignment) hits against mRNAs?
      Some mature miRNA from duifferent species, miRNA from the same miRNA family or isomiR from the same hairpin have only 1-2 nt difference. So most packages only allow perfect match.

      Comment

      • NicoBxl
        not just another member
        • Aug 2010
        • 264

        #4
        Originally posted by petang View Post
        Why should my reads have perfect (no bp mis-alignment) hits against mRNAs?
        Some mature miRNA from duifferent species, miRNA from the same miRNA family or isomiR from the same hairpin have only 1-2 nt difference. So most packages only allow perfect match.
        Perfect matches against mRNAs are perfectly normal. They are degradation of mRNAs.

        Did you used ncRNA databases ( RFam ) to annotate reads that aren't miRNAs ?

        For the introns alignment, like Kennels said, maybe mirtrons ?

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
          by SEQadmin2



          Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

          Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
          ...
          10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
          by SEQadmin2


          Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

          We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
          ...
          09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
        0 responses
        29 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
        0 responses
        22 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
        0 responses
        38 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
        0 responses
        45 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...