Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • pengchy
    replied
    Is SliderII's paper published?
    And the picture in this link can not be displayed
    High quality SNP calling using Illumina data at minimal coverage
    Last edited by pengchy; 10-09-2011, 11:52 PM. Reason: more questions

    Leave a comment:


  • nmalhis
    replied
    Hi Nix,

    I used the Ensembl Variation database (version 50) SNPs.
    You need to adjust the format.

    Nawar

    Leave a comment:


  • Nix
    replied
    What coordinate system are you using for generating a table of known snps to feed into SliderII. Is this 1 based? or 0 based? Does anyone have a table for mouse 2007, mm9?

    Leave a comment:


  • nmalhis
    replied
    > Hi,
    >
    > I am very interested in your SNP Caller SilderII. I am trying to use it. I have one question for you. What's the meaning of SNP_in in the config file? I didn't find the explanation for the item from sliderII website.
    >
    > Thank you very much.
    >
    > Rebecca

    SNP_in is the expected number of bases in the reference genome for each one SNP, for the human genome, this number should be 1000.

    Nawar

    Leave a comment:


  • lh3
    replied
    2. Do you mean you exclude SNPs towards the ends of a read? These are the false SNPs caused by indels. A better strategy would be to filter out SNPs close to predicted indels.

    3. Sorry that I did not read through the whole page. I now realize that this is a seeding-extension algorithm. You allow maximum one mutation in the seed but may extend the seed to allow more. By the way, the page said "the smaller the seed size is, the faster the alignment will be". Is this a typo?

    Leave a comment:


  • nmalhis
    replied
    - Regarding paralogous, Slider identify paralogous SNPs (and contig edge SNPs) as they are likely to be at the edges of the reads.
    - Yes, Slider (and SliderII) allows up to one mutation, plus, it consider all possible bases in prb data, and when using PET reads, SliderII force align reads if other side is aligned.

    Nawar

    Leave a comment:


  • nmalhis
    replied
    Yes, just check the link:

    High quality SNP calling using Illumina data at minimal coverage


    N.

    Leave a comment:


  • bioinfosm
    replied
    Any insight on how slider results compare to MAQ SNP calling on single/paired data?

    Originally posted by lh3 View Post
    Thanks for this. I am always fancinated by slider. I guess this is the first SNP caller that explicitly use four quality values. James Bonfield and Mark Daly both believe and show some preliminary result that using four values leads to better SNP calls. Some comments on the figures at your website:

    1. It is interesting to see you also come to the point of using known allele frequency as a prior, the same as BGI's SNP caller. When I did SNP calling for that NA18507, I also suggested this, but all the rest of people said it is cheating somehow and rejected my suggestion. They more like to think there are two problems: SNP discovery and genotyping. For SNP discovery, we only use a flat prior and for genotyping, we use the allele frequency.

    2. How Slider detect paralogous regions? To detect CNV first and then filter out the SNPs in CNVs? I agree that setting maximum depth as is used by maq is not a good way.

    3. I am not sure if I read your paper properly. As I understand, only one mutation (not sequencing errors) is allowed on one read. Is that right?

    Leave a comment:


  • bosTau2
    replied
    step by step

    I checked http://www.bcgsc.ca/platform/bioinfo/software/SliderII
    and think it does alignment by steps.

    # Alignment.Java: Find read locations on the reference sequence with an exact match and one-off match (one base mismatch) to prb derived sequences.
    # Extend.java: Expand reads to include up to 3 mismatches

    Leave a comment:


  • lh3
    replied
    Thanks for this. I am always fancinated by slider. I guess this is the first SNP caller that explicitly use four quality values. James Bonfield and Mark Daly both believe and show some preliminary result that using four values leads to better SNP calls. Some comments on the figures at your website:

    1. It is interesting to see you also come to the point of using known allele frequency as a prior, the same as BGI's SNP caller. When I did SNP calling for that NA18507, I also suggested this, but all the rest of people said it is cheating somehow and rejected my suggestion. They more like to think there are two problems: SNP discovery and genotyping. For SNP discovery, we only use a flat prior and for genotyping, we use the allele frequency.

    2. How Slider detect paralogous regions? To detect CNV first and then filter out the SNPs in CNVs? I agree that setting maximum depth as is used by maq is not a good way.

    3. I am not sure if I read your paper properly. As I understand, only one mutation (not sequencing errors) is allowed on one read. Is that right?

    Leave a comment:


  • SliderII: High Quality SNP Calling Using Illumina Data at Shallow Coverage

    SliderII is now available from:

    High quality SNP calling using Illumina data at minimal coverage


    Sorry for the delay,

    Nawar

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • seqadmin
    Genetic Variation in Immunogenetics and Antibody Diversity
    by seqadmin



    The field of immunogenetics explores how genetic variations influence immune responses and susceptibility to disease. In a recent SEQanswers webinar, Oscar Rodriguez, Ph.D., Postdoctoral Researcher at the University of Louisville, and Ruben Martínez Barricarte, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Medicine at Vanderbilt University, shared recent advancements in immunogenetics. This article discusses their research on genetic variation in antibody loci, antibody production processes,...
    11-06-2024, 07:24 PM
  • seqadmin
    Choosing Between NGS and qPCR
    by seqadmin



    Next-generation sequencing (NGS) and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) are essential techniques for investigating the genome, transcriptome, and epigenome. In many cases, choosing the appropriate technique is straightforward, but in others, it can be more challenging to determine the most effective option. A simple distinction is that smaller, more focused projects are typically better suited for qPCR, while larger, more complex datasets benefit from NGS. However,...
    10-18-2024, 07:11 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by seqadmin, Today, 11:09 AM
0 responses
24 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, Today, 06:13 AM
0 responses
20 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 11-01-2024, 06:09 AM
0 responses
30 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 10-30-2024, 05:31 AM
0 responses
21 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Working...
X