Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • pmiguel
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2008
    • 2328

    #1

    SHORE/SHOREmap issues with CASAVA 1.8?

    Can anyone get SHORE/SHOREmap to work with CASAVA 1.8 (Illumina Hi chemistry v3)? If so could they offer some tips?


    My details follow:
    I have a lane of arabidopsis 2x100 (PE) sequence and am running SHORE/SHOREmap for the first time.

    For the uninitiated, SHORE appears to be a general purpose NGS mapping pipeline capable of deploying a number of mapping engines, though it appears to prefer "genomemapper", for a number of different analysis tasks. SHOREmap is a visualization/analysis tool requiring, more or less, SHORE input.

    The first part seems good:

    SHORE v0.6.2beta (rev. c5f8-1879) pulls in the fastq files and aligns them to a TAIR9 fasta reference with genomemapper0.4.3. The PE correction and "merging" appear to go fine.

    The problems start when I attempt to generate the homozygous_snp.txt file needed by SHOREmap to continue. Earlier versions of SHORE would have "shore consensus" run to do this. But:

    (1) shore consensus with v0.6.2beta has a mysterious, new parameter, "-g" that I don't know how to set. This one:

    Code:
       -g  INT        Core offset - do not trust the first and last -g positions of the alignment. default: max MM's
    so attempts to run consensus produce no joy.

    (2) SHORE v0.6.2beta documentation recommends using "qvar" instead of consensus. Running qvar produces a gigantic (37G) "pileup.txt" file and, with some parameter settings, generates CNV info. But the homozygous_snps.txt file is always zero length.

    (3) SHORE v0.5 "shore consensus" would be my second choice. But "shore import" chokes on the new CASAVA 1.8 header info (you know, the abandonment of the /1 and /2 fields?). So again: brick wall.

    I don't see a forum or email list devoted to these programs. I emailed one of the authors, Stephan Ossowski, earlier this week. But no response so far.

    Any advice?

    --
    Phillip

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • kinpict.com
    Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
    by kinpict.com
    The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
    Today, 06:37 PM
  • SEQadmin2
    16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
    by SEQadmin2





    NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
    10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
0 responses
27 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
0 responses
35 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
2 responses
56 views
0 reactions
Last Post kinpict.com  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
0 responses
175 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...