Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • fongchun
    Member
    • May 2011
    • 55

    #1

    TopHat-Fusions Error

    Hi all,

    Has anyone else run into this error when running TopHat-Fusions

    "Error: Splice sequence retrieval failed with err =-11"

    I am using the latest beta version of TopHat-Fusions (0.1.0) and a version compiled from source. The exact command I am running is:

    Code:
    tophat-fusion --solexa1.3-quals --library-type fr-unstranded -o A05247 -p 2 --allow-indels --no-coverage-search -r 136 --mate-std-dev 80 --fusion-min-dist 100000 --fusion-anchor-length 13 -G ucsc.gtf bowtie_indices/hg19 reads.1.fastq reads.2.fastq
    This is not some random one library error. It's happened in 5 libraries. I've emailed the creators of it, but haven't got any replies. So any help or suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Below is the full log of the error. Thanks.

    [Tue Nov 8 09:58:56 2011] Beginning TopHat run (v0.1.0 (Beta))
    -----------------------------------------------
    [Tue Nov 8 09:58:56 2011] Preparing output location /share/lustre/gascoyne/WTSS/HL_CELL_LINES/tophat_fusions/A05247/
    [Tue Nov 8 09:58:56 2011] Checking for Bowtie index files
    [Tue Nov 8 09:58:56 2011] Checking for reference FASTA file
    [Tue Nov 8 09:58:56 2011] Checking for Bowtie
    Bowtie version: 0.12.7.0
    [Tue Nov 8 09:58:56 2011] Checking for Samtools
    Samtools Version: 0.1.18
    [Tue Nov 8 09:59:05 2011] Checking reads
    min read length: 76bp, max read length: 76bp
    format: fastq
    quality scale: phred64 (reads generated with GA pipeline version >= 1.3)
    [Tue Nov 8 11:18:00 2011] Reading known junctions from GTF file
    [Tue Nov 8 11:41:07 2011] Mapping reads against hg19 with Bowtie
    [Tue Nov 8 16:50:08 2011] Joining segment hits
    [Tue Nov 8 17:23:26 2011] Mapping reads against hg19 with Bowtie (1/3)
    [Tue Nov 8 21:08:36 2011] Mapping reads against hg19 with Bowtie (2/3)
    [Wed Nov 9 00:47:34 2011] Mapping reads against hg19 with Bowtie (3/3)
    [Wed Nov 9 03:33:56 2011] Mapping reads against hg19 with Bowtie
    [Wed Nov 9 08:08:31 2011] Joining segment hits
    [Wed Nov 9 08:42:17 2011] Mapping reads against hg19 with Bowtie (1/3)
    [Wed Nov 9 12:58:22 2011] Mapping reads against hg19 with Bowtie (2/3)
    [Wed Nov 9 17:26:48 2011] Mapping reads against hg19 with Bowtie (3/3)
    [Wed Nov 9 21:03:10 2011] Searching for junctions via segment mapping
    [Thu Nov 10 01:46:20 2011] Retrieving sequences for splices
    [FAILED]
    Error: Splice sequence retrieval failed with err =-11
  • lshen
    Member
    • Jan 2008
    • 30

    #2
    My feeling, it is related to the " -G ucsc.gtf". Maybe you wan to try without using -G?

    Comment

    • Nicolas
      Member
      • Apr 2009
      • 41

      #3
      I have the same problem. From the logs, I understood that it's related to tophat-report, which crashes with a segmentation fault error. I didn't find a solution yet. (wrote to the authors, no answer...)
      Please keep us updated if you do find something. I'll do the same.

      Comment

      • fongchun
        Member
        • May 2011
        • 55

        #4
        Ishen was right. It was the "-G ucsc.gtf" parameter that was causing the problem. I have removed that parameter and TopHat-Fusions has been able to get pass the problem. It is still running, but I will keep you guys posted if any other errors appear.

        It's weird that this would be the problem. I used the "-G ucsc.gtf" parameter in a normal TopHat run and it never complained.

        Comment

        • papori
          Senior Member
          • Dec 2010
          • 181

          #5
          Hi,
          i have kind of the same error.. (also in the fusion), but diffrent number(-6)
          i dont use -G.. so its not my problem..

          this is my command:
          ./tophat -o Tophat/Sample1 -r 430 -p 10 preparereference/reference 50_se_first/1.fa

          The output:

          [2012-04-25 08:51:25] Beginning TopHat run (v2.0.0)
          -----------------------------------------------
          [2012-04-25 08:51:25] Checking for Bowtie
          Bowtie 2 not found, checking for older version..
          Bowtie version: 0.12.7.0
          [2012-04-25 08:51:25] Checking for Samtools
          Samtools version: 0.1.18.0
          [2012-04-25 08:51:25] Checking for Bowtie index files
          [2012-04-25 08:51:25] Checking for reference FASTA file
          [2012-04-25 08:51:25] Generating SAM header for
          preparereference/reference
          format: fastq
          quality scale: phred33 (default)
          [2012-04-25 08:51:28] Preparing reads
          left reads: min. length=51, count=3076259
          [2012-04-25 08:52:14] Mapping left_kept_reads against reference with Bowtie
          [2012-04-25 08:53:58] Mapping left_kept_reads_seg1 against reference with Bowtie (1/2)
          [2012-04-25 08:54:24] Mapping left_kept_reads_seg2 against reference with Bowtie (2/2)
          [2012-04-25 08:54:46] Searching for junctions via segment mapping
          [2012-04-25 08:55:29] Retrieving sequences for splices
          [FAILED]
          Error: Splice sequence retrieval failed with err =-6

          Any idea?

          Thanks,
          Pap

          Comment

          • lshen
            Member
            • Jan 2008
            • 30

            #6
            I got it run on human samples without -G, though results are not convincing for my data (only single reads, 57 nt--maybe too short).



            /path_to/tophat-2.0.0.Linux_x86_64/tophat -o tophat_T6 --bowtie1 -p 8 --fusion-search --keep-fasta-order --no-coverage-search --bowtie1 -r 0 --fusion-anchor-length 13 --fusion-ignore-chromosomes chrM /path_to/hg19/genome T6.223.fastq


            /path_to/tophat-2.0.0.Linux_x86_64//tophat-fusion-post -p 8 --num-fusion-reads 1 --num-fusion-pairs 0 --num-fusion-both 0 /path_to/hg19/genome



            Originally posted by papori View Post
            Hi,
            i have kind of the same error.. (also in the fusion), but diffrent number(-6)
            i dont use -G.. so its not my problem..

            Comment

            • papori
              Senior Member
              • Dec 2010
              • 181

              #7
              The wierd thing is that i have 12 replicate of the same sample and the rest work fine(with same reference)
              Moreover, when i changed the reference , all the samples work fine..
              The problem is that i must have those 2 references..

              The log files tail:
              juncs_db.log
              Loading comp35832_c0_seq1...done
              Loading comp34767_c0_seq1...done
              Loading ...done
              ./SeqAn-1.3/seqan/sequence/segment_infix.h:81 Assertion failed : data_begin_position <= data_end_position was: 377 > 376

              prep_reads.log
              tophat-2.0.0.Linux_x86_64/prep_reads: /lib64/libz.so.1: no version information available (required by tophat-2.0.0.Linux_x86_64/prep_reads)
              prep_reads v2.0.0 (3280)
              ---------------------------
              106649 out of 3182908 reads have been filtered out

              run.log
              tophat-2.0.0.Linux_x86_64/juncs_db 3 26 Approch_cufflinks_cuffdiff/Tophat/Trinity/Sample1/tmp/segment.juncs Approch_cufflinks_cuffdiff/Tophat/Trinity/Sample1/tmp/segment.insertions Approch_cufflinks_cuffdiff/Tophat/Trinity/Sample1/tmp/segment.deletions /dev/null LeechCdhit_preparereference2/LeechCdhit.fa > Approch_cufflinks_cuffdiff/Tophat/Trinity/Sample1/tmp/segment_juncs.fa

              segment_juncs.log
              Examining donor-acceptor pairings in comp99_c0_seq1
              found 27107 potential junctions
              Reported 27159 total potential splices
              Reporting 356 potential deletions...
              Reporting 167 potential insertions...
              Reporting potential fusions...


              I will very appreciate any help!?!

              Pap

              Comment

              • DJParker
                Junior Member
                • Jan 2012
                • 7

                #8
                Do you think the problem may be arising from the failed assertion (Assertion failed : data_begin_position <= data_end_position was: 377 > 376) that the start position is a higher number that the end position?

                I also have this error, not sure how to get round it.

                Any ideas anyone?

                D

                Comment

                Latest Articles

                Collapse

                • SEQadmin2
                  Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
                  by SEQadmin2



                  CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

                  Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
                  ...
                  07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
                • SEQadmin2
                  Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
                  by SEQadmin2


                  Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

                  The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
                  ...
                  07-20-2026, 11:48 AM

                ad_right_rmr

                Collapse

                News

                Collapse

                Topics Statistics Last Post
                Started by SEQadmin2, 08-06-2026, 07:41 AM
                0 responses
                23 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 08-03-2026, 10:13 AM
                0 responses
                37 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 07-31-2026, 02:55 AM
                0 responses
                43 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 07-24-2026, 12:17 PM
                0 responses
                26 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Working...