Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • pageskipro
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2011
    • 8

    #1

    interpreting cuffdiff output with and without replicates

    Hi SEQers

    I am calling on your expertise!

    I have an RNA Seq data set which is a growth time series.

    I have used Tophat->Cufflinks->Cuffdiff on these data.

    To look at differential gene expression between 6 time points I have use the cuffdiff output file the gene_exp.diff file.

    I have run cuffdiff three different ways
    1. with the -T (time series) option
    2. with out the -T option
    3. just using two time points - comparing the first time point to each successive time point.

    Each of these runs produces different numbers of significantly different genes between any two time points. As one might expect, the overall the numbers of genes with significant differential expression is much lower in case 1 and 2 compared to case 3.

    I would like to understand the reason for this.

    Looking at the gene_exp.diff file output from cuffdiff particularly column 10 the "test stat" this number is different if looking at a .diff file that came from a comparison of two files (case 3) vs one which came from all 6 time points (cases 1 and 2).

    Reading the cufflink manuel and associate information on line it looks like "test stat" is calculated based on a variance of the fpkm's of each replicate.

    I am assuming that these differences are because when I use these 6 files (.bams) in cuffdiff with or with out the -T option (case 1 or 2 ) cuffdiff uses these 6 files as though they are replicates. In case 3 where I have only use two bam files for cuffdiff
    for some genes there are two replicates and others there are no replicates.

    My question is how would you interpret the data from case 3? Should I disregard case 3 and only consider data from cases 1 and 2?

    Thanks for your insights,

    Cynthia


    from http://cufflinks.cbcb.umd.edu/howitworks#hdif

    "Note that in order to calculate the test statistic T, we need to know the variance of the expression level in each condition. The variance needs to include the variability in the number of fragments generated by the transcript across replicates, and should also incorporate any uncertainty in the expression estimate itself."
  • pageskipro
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2011
    • 8

    #2
    Whoops where I said .bam I meant .sam!

    Comment

    • pageskipro
      Junior Member
      • Jan 2011
      • 8

      #3
      Actually I think this assumption of mine in not correct:

      I am assuming that these differences are because when I use these 6 files (.sam) in cuffdiff with or with out the -T option (case 1 or 2 ) cuffdiff uses these 6 files as though they are replicates. In case 3 where I have only use two bam files for cuffdiff
      for some genes there are two replicates and others there are no replicates.

      These are not considered replicates - so why am I getting different "test stat" numbers in the gene_exp.diff files?

      Comment

      • songyj
        Member
        • Sep 2011
        • 15

        #4
        I use Tophat outfiles (.sam) in cuffdiff always without the -T option.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
          by SEQadmin2



          Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

          Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
          ...
          10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
          by SEQadmin2


          Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

          We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
          ...
          09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
        0 responses
        29 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
        0 responses
        22 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
        0 responses
        39 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
        0 responses
        45 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...