Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • adaptivegenome
    replied
    Originally posted by RDW View Post
    Just to clarify, my understanding is that the DINDEL option they were using for the Unified Genotyper a few months ago was indeed similar to the freestanding Dindel program from Sanger, but the INDEL option they're now using is based on a different model (which continues to evolve). So all the more reason to do the comparison you suggest (and post the results!).
    Yes, I will post what I find...

    Leave a comment:


  • RDW
    replied
    Originally posted by genericforms View Post
    So it seems the method is similar or the same, but Eric and his group are continuously updating the error model?
    Just to clarify, my understanding is that the DINDEL option they were using for the Unified Genotyper a few months ago was indeed similar to the freestanding Dindel program from Sanger, but the INDEL option they're now using is based on a different model (which continues to evolve). So all the more reason to do the comparison you suggest (and post the results!).

    Leave a comment:


  • adaptivegenome
    replied
    Originally posted by RDW View Post
    The current method is called INDEL rather than DINDEL, and it's not the same. See this reply to a similar query from Eric Banks at GSA:



    "In our own tests the newest model performs best, which is why we transitioned over to it. To be honest, though, the genotype likelihoods model for indels is still in constant flux and we are continuously improving it...The reason why we renamed it, by the way, is that this newer model is not really related to the actual "Dindel" software while the previous one was very much inspired by it. We felt that it wasn't fair to the authors of Dindel to continue naming it after their tool."
    I appreciate this. So it seems the method is similar or the same, but Eric and his group are continuously updating the error model? So I think I will have to compare both to see how they perform on my data.

    Thanks again for the post.
    Last edited by adaptivegenome; 11-24-2011, 01:06 PM. Reason: typo

    Leave a comment:


  • RDW
    replied
    Originally posted by genericforms View Post
    The latest version of GATK does not appear to have a DINDEL option for the indel caller. Is DINDEL the default method for indel calling with the GATK Unified Genotyper?

    Has anyone compared the two tools to confirm this?
    The current method is called INDEL rather than DINDEL, and it's not the same. See this reply to a similar query from Eric Banks at GSA:



    "In our own tests the newest model performs best, which is why we transitioned over to it. To be honest, though, the genotype likelihoods model for indels is still in constant flux and we are continuously improving it...The reason why we renamed it, by the way, is that this newer model is not really related to the actual "Dindel" software while the previous one was very much inspired by it. We felt that it wasn't fair to the authors of Dindel to continue naming it after their tool."

    Leave a comment:


  • adaptivegenome
    started a topic Latest GATK and DINDEL

    Latest GATK and DINDEL

    The latest version of GATK does not appear to have a DINDEL option for the indel caller. Is DINDEL the default method for indel calling with the GATK Unified Genotyper?

    Has anyone compared the two tools to confirm this?

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • kinpict.com
    Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
    by kinpict.com
    The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
    Today, 06:37 PM
  • SEQadmin2
    16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
    by SEQadmin2





    NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
    10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
0 responses
28 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
0 responses
35 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
2 responses
56 views
0 reactions
Last Post kinpict.com  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
0 responses
175 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...