Originally posted by Simon Anders
View Post
Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
-
I must confess, my usual route for solving these is to simulate them with a quick program (learning this skill can be valuable!); I'm always nervous I'll choose the wrong probability model. The obvious field for the right model would be hypergeometric, Poisson & binomial.
The sort of obvious guess is that since you have 3X coverage of your genome, there should be only about 3 positive wells in your entire collection. If that logic holds, then you can superpool quite a bit.
I would be tempted to initially generate pools for each plate, then combine those to form 96 superpools. You expect 3ish hits in the superpools. One more round of PCR lets you identify which plates have positive wells, and then you can just screen the plates.
Comment
-
Why not just arrange the 1680 plates into a 40X42 array. Then make pools of all the samples in each row of 40 and each column of 42. PCR these 82 pools. The results give you the row and column position of each positive 96 well plate in your 40x42 array. Then test each clone in the positive plates. You won't miss any positives--if there happen to be two positives in the same plate you will find that. Assuming that there are three positives,you will do less than 400 PCR reactions to find the individual positive clones.
Comment
-
For what it's worth, I'm really glad this wasn't homework and actual experimental biology.
In the future (and anyone reading this contemplating doing the same bounty for help...)...please be honest. As Simon said, the fun is in the biology...you're much more likely to get help being honest (with or without a bounty).
Comment
-
Originally posted by krobison View PostI would be tempted to initially generate pools for each plate, then combine those to form 96 superpools. You expect 3ish hits in the superpools. One more round of PCR lets you identify which plates have positive wells, and then you can just screen the plates.
In your advice, you've already give the "96" as the superpool number, but I need the reason.Last edited by Godevil; 12-15-2011, 08:53 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dbarker06 View PostWhy not just arrange the 1680 plates into a 40X42 array. Then make pools of all the samples in each row of 40 and each column of 42. PCR these 82 pools. The results give you the row and column position of each positive 96 well plate in your 40x42 array. Then test each clone in the positive plates. You won't miss any positives--if there happen to be two positives in the same plate you will find that. Assuming that there are three positives,you will do less than 400 PCR reactions to find the individual positive clones.
What you said is the 2 dimension-based design. But I prefer to use 3 or higher dimension, which can save me much more time and money for PCR. I've already considered lots of screening design. Higher dimention means more false possitive.
As in the 2-dimension method, the most false positive results is 3^2-3; in 3D is 3^3-3. The only way to reduce the false positive is to make sure only one positive clone locates in one superpool.
So, please help me on my probability question.Last edited by Godevil; 12-15-2011, 10:26 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ECO View PostFor what it's worth, I'm really glad this wasn't homework and actual experimental biology.
In the future (and anyone reading this contemplating doing the same bounty for help...)...please be honest. As Simon said, the fun is in the biology...you're much more likely to get help being honest (with or without a bounty).
Whatever, if you are good at probability, please help me.Last edited by Godevil; 12-15-2011, 08:46 PM.
Comment
-
The recommended two-dimension design, followed by screening individual candidate plates (using 8x12 matrix, if you want to minimize the number of PCRs) is the most efficient method. If you're committed to higher order screening with fewer false positives, you may be able to incorporate a Steiner triple system (see http://www.nature.com/nmeth/journal/...nmeth1063.html for a similar application).
Comment
Latest Articles
Collapse
-
by seqadmin
The sequencing world is rapidly changing due to declining costs, enhanced accuracies, and the advent of newer, cutting-edge instruments. Equally important to these developments are improvements in sequencing analysis, a process that converts vast amounts of raw data into a comprehensible and meaningful form. This complex task requires expertise and the right analysis tools. In this article, we highlight the progress and innovation in sequencing analysis by reviewing several of the...-
Channel: Articles
Yesterday, 07:48 AM -
-
by seqadmin
The field of epigenetics has traditionally concentrated more on DNA and how changes like methylation and phosphorylation of histones impact gene expression and regulation. However, our increased understanding of RNA modifications and their importance in cellular processes has led to a rise in epitranscriptomics research. “Epitranscriptomics brings together the concepts of epigenetics and gene expression,” explained Adrien Leger, PhD, Principal Research Scientist...-
Channel: Articles
04-22-2024, 07:01 AM -
ad_right_rmr
Collapse
News
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by seqadmin, Today, 06:57 AM
|
0 responses
9 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
Today, 06:57 AM
|
||
Started by seqadmin, Yesterday, 07:17 AM
|
0 responses
14 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
Yesterday, 07:17 AM
|
||
Started by seqadmin, 05-02-2024, 08:06 AM
|
0 responses
19 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
05-02-2024, 08:06 AM
|
||
Started by seqadmin, 04-30-2024, 12:17 PM
|
0 responses
23 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
04-30-2024, 12:17 PM
|
Comment