Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • hosang.jeon
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2012
    • 6

    #1

    SOAP2 (SOAPaligner) -v option

    Our team use SOAP2 to align our read data (human sample).



    During the processing situation, I found that -v option value has no effect to the result & execution time of alignment.

    Here the command usage we wrote.



    soap -v 4 -a $INPUT_FILE -D $REFERENCE_FILE -o $TMP_FILE

    soap2sam.pl $TMP_FILE 1> $OUTPUT_FILE



    We tried to change the -v option value from 0 to 3, but after the soap program is completed we found that the result has the same mapping results.

    By googling about the -v option of SOAP2, we've been told we should use -M option combination with -v option (http://seqanswers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2411)

    But It seems that the value 1, and 2 of -M option doesn't have the exactly same meaning with "ALLOWED NUMBER OF MISMATCH" but "ONLY THE ALIGNMENT WHICH HAS # MISMATCH(ES)".



    -M <int> match mode for each read or the seed part of read, which shouldn't contain more than 2 mismaches, [4]
    0: exact match only
    1: 1 mismatch match only
    2: 2 mismatch match only
    4: find the best hits


    I feel this problem cannot be handled by myself, so I need your explanation or comments.

    What can I do to get the alignment outputs which have differenct number of allowed mismatches?



    Sincerely.
    Last edited by hosang.jeon; 02-23-2012, 07:43 PM. Reason: I wrote a question but I posted it.
  • bionet
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2013
    • 2

    #2
    Yes please more info on this topic is really necessary.
    what I was told it to use the seed value in -l so then the mismaches will be used from -v

    I just found this: https://groups.google.com/forum/?fro...ap/a-a_Ydmg2r8

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • SEQadmin2
      Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
      by SEQadmin2



      CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

      Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
      ...
      07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
      by SEQadmin2


      Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

      The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
      ...
      07-20-2026, 11:48 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 08-06-2026, 07:41 AM
    0 responses
    23 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 08-03-2026, 10:13 AM
    0 responses
    38 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-31-2026, 02:55 AM
    0 responses
    43 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-24-2026, 12:17 PM
    0 responses
    26 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...