Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • hosang.jeon
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2012
    • 6

    SOAP2 (SOAPaligner) -v option

    Our team use SOAP2 to align our read data (human sample).



    During the processing situation, I found that -v option value has no effect to the result & execution time of alignment.

    Here the command usage we wrote.



    soap -v 4 -a $INPUT_FILE -D $REFERENCE_FILE -o $TMP_FILE

    soap2sam.pl $TMP_FILE 1> $OUTPUT_FILE



    We tried to change the -v option value from 0 to 3, but after the soap program is completed we found that the result has the same mapping results.

    By googling about the -v option of SOAP2, we've been told we should use -M option combination with -v option (http://seqanswers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2411)

    But It seems that the value 1, and 2 of -M option doesn't have the exactly same meaning with "ALLOWED NUMBER OF MISMATCH" but "ONLY THE ALIGNMENT WHICH HAS # MISMATCH(ES)".



    -M <int> match mode for each read or the seed part of read, which shouldn't contain more than 2 mismaches, [4]
    0: exact match only
    1: 1 mismatch match only
    2: 2 mismatch match only
    4: find the best hits


    I feel this problem cannot be handled by myself, so I need your explanation or comments.

    What can I do to get the alignment outputs which have differenct number of allowed mismatches?



    Sincerely.
    Last edited by hosang.jeon; 02-23-2012, 07:43 PM. Reason: I wrote a question but I posted it.
  • bionet
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2013
    • 2

    #2
    Yes please more info on this topic is really necessary.
    what I was told it to use the seed value in -l so then the mismaches will be used from -v

    I just found this: https://groups.google.com/forum/?fro...ap/a-a_Ydmg2r8

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
      by SEQadmin2


      Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


      The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
      ...
      06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 05:37 AM
    0 responses
    6 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
    0 responses
    17 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
    0 responses
    51 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
    0 responses
    110 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...