Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Hi
    May please someone check my attached cuff_diff results. I have problem with high error bar and low FPKM value. Is there something wrong with sequencing or its a cufflinks problem?
    Second, there are only few genes in either samples (not in all) with 0 FPKM value; for example, control 3840.28 FPKM and treated 0 FPKM with Log2_fold_change=Inf. Attached File 0_FPKM.png Expression bar plot indicates high fold expression ? Can I ignore this one which seems significant ?

    Thank you very much

    Click image for larger version

Name:	1 csDensity.png
Views:	1
Size:	15.5 KB
ID:	304263

    Click image for larger version

Name:	csBoxplot_genes.png
Views:	1
Size:	11.6 KB
ID:	304264

    Click image for larger version

Name:	dispersionPlot_genes.png
Views:	1
Size:	22.5 KB
ID:	304265

    Click image for larger version

Name:	seq.png
Views:	3
Size:	13.3 KB
ID:	304266

    Click image for larger version

Name:	0_FPKM.png
Views:	1
Size:	6.2 KB
ID:	304267
    Last edited by jp.; 07-24-2013, 10:49 PM. Reason: adding info

    Comment


    • #47
      Cuffllinks variance, gene expression level and ifferential expression

      Hello ! which kind of sequencing was that - fragment or paired ends ? it changes a lot

      You have to look at the *count.tracking files and examine the count variance values

      There are instances (especially with fragment sequencing) for which the count variance is far greater than the counts - actually I would like to know from Cole wether this is somewhat expected

      Here is an example (see the values for q2), with the associated gene expression reported below - looks like for q2 a FPKM of 0 is calculated due to the enormous variance, am I right ?

      tracking_id q1_count q1_count_variance q1_count_uncertainty_var q1_count_dispersion_var q1_status q2_count q2_count_variance q2_count_uncertainty_var q2_count_dispersion_var q2_status

      GAPDH 308519 40753000 0 308519 OK 207559 10265500000 0 10265500000 OK


      test_id gene locus status MCF7 MCFS MCF7+MCFS log2(fold_change) test_stat p_value q_value significant

      NM_001256799 GAPDH chr12:6643584-6647537 OK 11.25 0.00 11.25 =-inf nan 0.00005 0.0142079 yes

      I am running software versions as follows on Color Space reads (so I have to stick to the old bowtie..)

      bowtie version 1.0.0
      TopHat v2.0.9
      cufflinks v2.1.1

      Thanks in advance for any feedback,

      Alessandro

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • seqadmin
        Recent Advances in Sequencing Analysis Tools
        by seqadmin


        The sequencing world is rapidly changing due to declining costs, enhanced accuracies, and the advent of newer, cutting-edge instruments. Equally important to these developments are improvements in sequencing analysis, a process that converts vast amounts of raw data into a comprehensible and meaningful form. This complex task requires expertise and the right analysis tools. In this article, we highlight the progress and innovation in sequencing analysis by reviewing several of the...
        Yesterday, 07:48 AM
      • seqadmin
        Essential Discoveries and Tools in Epitranscriptomics
        by seqadmin




        The field of epigenetics has traditionally concentrated more on DNA and how changes like methylation and phosphorylation of histones impact gene expression and regulation. However, our increased understanding of RNA modifications and their importance in cellular processes has led to a rise in epitranscriptomics research. “Epitranscriptomics brings together the concepts of epigenetics and gene expression,” explained Adrien Leger, PhD, Principal Research Scientist...
        04-22-2024, 07:01 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by seqadmin, Yesterday, 07:17 AM
      0 responses
      11 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 05-02-2024, 08:06 AM
      0 responses
      19 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 04-30-2024, 12:17 PM
      0 responses
      20 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 04-29-2024, 10:49 AM
      0 responses
      28 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Working...
      X