Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • EGrassi
    Member
    • Oct 2010
    • 66

    #1

    Tophat 2.0 error

    Hello, after 1 week of alignments (100bp paired reads, 176mil of them, 6 cores was all I had...) tophat2.0 failed after the last step of alignments (I believe):

    [2012-05-22 11:16:12] Joining segment hits
    [2012-05-22 14:23:48] Reporting output tracks
    Traceback (most recent call last):
    File "/home/data/rnaseq/bin/tophat", line 3778, in <module>
    sys.exit(main())
    File "/home/data/rnaseq/bin/tophat", line 3750, in main
    params.gff_annotation)
    File "/home/data/rnaseq/bin/tophat", line 2526, in compile_reports
    os.rename(sorted_bam_parts[0], output_dir + "accepted_hits.bam")
    IndexError: list index out of range
    make: *** [S1.th] Error 1


    I'm going to investigate if in the /tmp dir I will find all the needed files to go on with my analysis but I wanted to know if this is a known issue and if it is possible to fix it in some way...

    The command line was:
    tophat -p 5 -G /rogue/bioinfotree/prj/ewing-rnaseq/local/share/data/Homo_sapiens/UCSC/hg19/Annotation/Genes/genes.gtf --transcriptome-index=transcriptome -o S1.th ../alignment/expanded_genome2 <(zcat /rogue/bioinfotree/R1_001.fastq.gz),list of 11 fastq <(zcat /rogue/bioinfotree/R2_001.fastq.gz),list of 11 fastq
  • EGrassi
    Member
    • Oct 2010
    • 66

    #2
    Big datasets (~200M paired reads, 100bp) with tophat 2.0

    Ok, just to point other people in the right direction: thanks to the quick reply of the tophat developers I discovered that this was an out of memory issue...in this case tophat_reports failed with an alloc error but the python wrapper went on and crashed because there were no accepted_hits files in the tmp dir. I'm trying to avoid losing all that cpu time reproducing by hand on a machine with more memory the last steps of the analysis, if anyone is interested ask me.

    The developers also suggested me for datasets of this size to split up fastq in fragments of 40~60M to avoid this kind of problems.
    The funny thing is that for the first couple of splitted fastq (which were present in my first big run, this is somewhat puzzling) tophat now fails earlier in the pipeline, at the segment_juncs portion:

    Code:
    [2012-05-23 12:20:30] Searching for junctions via segment mapping
            [FAILED]
    Error: segment-based junction search failed with err =1
    Error: could not get read# 1 from stream!
    I've found this error cited in several threads but with old tophat versions or suggesting causes that here don't apply (it is not a memory issue, I've checked, not a permissions issue...). Any clue?

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • SEQadmin2
      Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
      by SEQadmin2



      Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

      Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
      ...
      10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
      by SEQadmin2


      Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

      We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
      ...
      09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
    0 responses
    26 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
    0 responses
    20 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
    0 responses
    36 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
    0 responses
    43 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...