[gringer]

Tablet has a "read concordance" mode for viewing strand direction on reads. Both pairs of reads that are consistent with a mapped direction following the reference sequence are coloured green (customisable), and reads that are consistent with the reverse complement of the reference sequence are coloured red.

[Camg]

Looks like Jim Robinson had it backwards for the color legends. Actually

red=positive,
blue=negative

He has clarified here:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!to...lp/YiVzwnUuOZM

I always thought that blue=positive and red=negative. See screen shots of my data in IGV.

I used Illumina dUTP-type stranded library prep and fr-firststrand with Tophat2. I find several places that say dUTP libraries should use fr-firststrand with Tophat, for example: http://onetipperday.sterding.com/201...pe-to-use.html
https://www.biostars.org/p/64250/

Is anyone able to clear this up?

Thanks

[sowmyai]

Looks like Jim Robinson had it backwards for the color legends. Actually

red=positive,
blue=negative

He has clarified here:

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/igv-help/YiVzwnUuOZM

[kmcarr]

I am fairly sure fr-firststrand means read one (aka forward read or fr) corresponds to the reference genome sequence (firststrand). fr-secondstrand means read one corresponds to the reverse complement (secondstrand) of the reference genome. FR and RF would be a similar concept - but they are just making a shorthand where if the read one or forward read corresponds to the reference strand it maps to the left of the reverse read on a linear representation of the genome (FR) and if it corresponds to the reverse complement of the reference it maps to the right of the reverse (RF).

I hope that makes sense -- you might need to go back to DNA/genome structure and how Illumina works to really understand the above.

I'm afraid that this is incorrect.

First 'fr' does not mean 'forward read'. What it means is the the two reads are arranged in the FR (Foward/Reverse) as opposed to the RF (Reverse/Forward) orientation. FR means that the read pairs are oriented with the 3' end point toward each other when aligned to the reference and RF means they are pointing away from each other.

FR:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
   ----------------->                              <-------------------

RF:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
   <-----------------                               ------------------->

Firststrand means that read #1 matches the first strand of cDNA generated during conversion of the single stranded mRNA to ds-cDNA. In other words the R1 is the reverse complement of the mRNA. Note that all of these reference landmarks are relative to transcript, not the genome. For Illumina strand specific, paired end mRNA-Seq reads the orientation of the reads relative to their original RNA is:

  mRNA 5'-----------------------------------------------------------AAAAAAAAAAAA
                   R2 ------------>                <------------ R1

[cliffbeall]

Thanks for the information.
But I still cannot understand the difference between fr-firststrand & fr-secondstrand in Tophat2 (or RF & FR in Hisat).
Can anyone help me with that?

I am fairly sure fr-firststrand means read one (aka forward read or fr) corresponds to the reference genome sequence (firststrand). fr-secondstrand means read one corresponds to the reverse complement (secondstrand) of the reference genome. FR and RF would be a similar concept - but they are just making a shorthand where if the read one or forward read corresponds to the reference strand it maps to the left of the reverse read on a linear representation of the genome (FR) and if it corresponds to the reverse complement of the reference it maps to the right of the reverse (RF).

I hope that makes sense -- you might need to go back to DNA/genome structure and how Illumina works to really understand the above.

[ArghavanAri]

Thanks for the information.
But I still cannot understand the difference between fr-firststrand & fr-secondstrand in Tophat2 (or RF & FR in Hisat).
Can anyone help me with that?

[gringer]

As others have mentioned, you need to consider the direction of mapping as well as the read number. For a standard Illumina strand-specific sample preparation, the reverse read is the first read:

• Reverse mapping, First read -- consistent with a gene model reading left to right on IGV
• Reverse mapping, Second read -- consistent with a gene model reading right to left on IGV
• Forward mapping, First read -- consistent with a gene model reading right to left on IGV
• Forward mapping, second read -- consistent with a gene model reading left to right on IGV

Just in case you weren't aware, Tablet (since v1.14.10.20) has a concordant / directional colouring mode that colours sequences appropriately.

[cliffbeall]

The two genes are on different strands, you can see by the little chevrons in the annotation track at bottom, so that is expected.

[ArghavanAri]

Hi,

I am trying to align and count the reads of paired-end strand-specific RNA-seq data using Hisat and htseq-count.
This is how my IGV look like. https://www.dropbox.com/s/snpapn051b...ness.jpeg?dl=0
(Color alignment by "first-of-pair strand") (view as pairs).
I am confused now. Why all the read pairs are red for NFE2L2? and clur for HNRNPA3?
I know that my data is strand specific, and that this color is showing the first pair read. So why both pairs have the same color?
Also can anyone tell me what options I should use for Hisat (or Tophat2) and htseq-count?

Thanks,

[stanikay]

Thanx panos-ed..

[panos_ed]

According to this, directional and strand-specific are the same.

[stanikay]

So is directional RNA-seq the same as strand-specific RNA-seq? any clarification will be greatly appreciated.

Thanx

[Dario1984]

red = neg strand (first read of the pair is no the neg strand)
blue = pos strand
grey = pair information not available, so "first of pair" is undefined

If I have Illumina directional RNA-seq data, should the colours be the opposite or the same as the strand of the RefSeq gene, when colouring by the first read of the pair ? My colours are opposite to the RefSeq gene, but when isoforms are assembled by Cufflinks with --library-type fr-secondstrand, the isoforms are, as expected, on the same strand as the gene.

[Simon Anders]

No, even in a non-strand-specific library, the two reads of a pair should point towards each other (or away from each other if it was a library-prep protocol with circularization). You should check whether it is predominantly the first read that point in the sense direction of the gene it aligns to.

[panos_ed]

Thanks for the info Jim!

So if most of the pairs in a contig contain reads that are like this:

=====>----------<=====
(red)           (blue)

then this means that sequencing was strand-specific.

Am I right?

What if both of them are red or blue?