Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dibrahim
    Junior Member
    • Feb 2010
    • 1

    #1

    Why do .wig files differ in lines

    Hi,

    I want to correlate the coverage two ChIP-seq experiments by comparing the coverage of extended reads (to mean fragment length) in non-overlapping intervals.

    Therefor, I've used the IGV-tools count option to generate .wig files from my sorted .bam files. Now the output file looks like this

    variableStep chrom=chr10 span=100
    1 0.68
    101 1.0
    201 1.56
    301 2.08
    401 3.42
    501 2.06
    601 1.45
    701 1.0
    801 1.26
    901 1.85


    I would now like to correlate two of these experiements in R BUT the output files of the various experiments don't have the same line numbers. So I cannot generate vectors where the one line matches the other

    I don't understand why the count program doesn't generate two files with the same line number? That's what I should expect, right?

    Does anyone know why the line number is different? Does anyone have a better way to correlate the datasets in non-overlapping intervals?

    Thanks

    Daniel
  • jujubix
    Member
    • May 2011
    • 14

    #2
    Without seeing the files or knowing how IGV-tools count works, this is purely a guess, but could it be omitting intervals with 0 coverage, which a variableStep .wig file can do? I recall encountering similar problems matching up two wig files, especially in regions of the chromosomes where coverage is absent.

    My solution was to write my own read counting program, or you could identify the missing intervals (e.g. setdiff in R) and manually insert them.

    Comment

    • DZhang
      Senior Member
      • Jun 2010
      • 177

      #3
      yes, WIG files omit positions with zero.

      Best regards,
      Douglas

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
        by SEQadmin2



        CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

        Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
        ...
        07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
        by SEQadmin2


        Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

        The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
        ...
        07-20-2026, 11:48 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 08-06-2026, 07:41 AM
      0 responses
      23 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 08-03-2026, 10:13 AM
      0 responses
      37 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-31-2026, 02:55 AM
      0 responses
      43 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-24-2026, 12:17 PM
      0 responses
      26 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...