Hi all, I'm running a blastx in my server. Iw had works everytime but now for a large file of sequences is doing something strange.
The query is the following:
nohup ../ncbi-blast-2.2.27+/bin/blastx -db ../bin/data/uniprot_kb_2012_06.fasta -query 42000seq.fa -evalue 0.05 -max_target_seqs 5 -outfmt 5 -num_threads 10 -out ouBlastxXML &
where uniprot_kb_2012... is a dataset containing all the protein taken from ncbi.
42000seq.fa is a file containing 42thousands sequences in fasta format
the ouput I want is in XML...
I runned it one week ago and obtained a completely empty file!
Now with nohup it's writing this:
Selenocysteine (U) at position 73 replaced by X
Selenocysteine (U) at position 40 replaced by X
Selenocysteine (U) at position 52 replaced by X
Selenocysteine (U) at position 48 replaced by X
Selenocysteine (U) at position 37 replaced by X
Selenocysteine (U) at position 40 replaced by X
Selenocysteine (U) at position 40 replaced by X
...and other similar lines...
and the xml file is still empty...
What's happening?
The same command on a query of ten sequences works well.
Someone knows where can I been wrong?
bye and thanks
Angelo
The query is the following:
nohup ../ncbi-blast-2.2.27+/bin/blastx -db ../bin/data/uniprot_kb_2012_06.fasta -query 42000seq.fa -evalue 0.05 -max_target_seqs 5 -outfmt 5 -num_threads 10 -out ouBlastxXML &
where uniprot_kb_2012... is a dataset containing all the protein taken from ncbi.
42000seq.fa is a file containing 42thousands sequences in fasta format
the ouput I want is in XML...
I runned it one week ago and obtained a completely empty file!
Now with nohup it's writing this:
Selenocysteine (U) at position 73 replaced by X
Selenocysteine (U) at position 40 replaced by X
Selenocysteine (U) at position 52 replaced by X
Selenocysteine (U) at position 48 replaced by X
Selenocysteine (U) at position 37 replaced by X
Selenocysteine (U) at position 40 replaced by X
Selenocysteine (U) at position 40 replaced by X
...and other similar lines...
and the xml file is still empty...
What's happening?
The same command on a query of ten sequences works well.
Someone knows where can I been wrong?
bye and thanks
Angelo
Comment