Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • DavyK
    replied
    I have only recently discovered this problem.
    Compiling using make runs ok, no errors.
    Indexing (human_g1k_v37 from the GATK website) on mac takes around an hour, as standard (I think).
    bwa aln runs with no errors, but as the OP mentions each step takes almost no time.
    bwa sampe also runs with no errors but fails to infer insert size at every step. The resulting sam file has no alignment coordinates in it, and flagstat shows 0% mapped reads.
    After transferring data to linux cluster, and rebuilding the index, everything seems ok and flagstat shows 89% of the reads have been mapped.

    I wonder is there some kind of library that a Standard Mac OSX lion is missing. Although is that was the case surely bwa would throw an error when it fails to import that library or package. I'm totally ignorant of C though so I'm guessing here.

    Leave a comment:


  • GenoMax
    replied
    Originally posted by wlangdon View Post
    Is anyone prepared to host a working version of the BWA index for the human genome?
    It would be about 4.5GB. I think it would take less than 2weeks to down load and I might
    have more confidence in it than either of the two version I have created using
    bwa index /tmp/INPUTS.fa -p h_sapiens_37.5 -a bwtsw

    Many thanks
    Bill
    Bill,

    Illumina built indexes are available at the iGenomes site.

    Last edited by GenoMax; 11-14-2012, 08:41 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • wlangdon
    replied
    It seems to me building the bwa indexes is error prone.
    I am just trying it again today and despite running what is supposed to be an
    identical script, I get different output (eg the first value in h_sapiens_37.5.amb is half
    the size of the value in the version bwt produced two weeks ago).

    Is anyone prepared to host a working version of the BWA index for the human genome?
    It would be about 4.5GB. I think it would take less than 2weeks to down load and I might
    have more confidence in it than either of the two version I have created using
    bwa index /tmp/INPUTS.fa -p h_sapiens_37.5 -a bwtsw

    Many thanks
    Bill

    Leave a comment:


  • TabeaK
    replied
    I realise that, currently running some single end alignments, which take longer...

    But anyway, the software does not produce weird faults as above, all my reads get processed and by "fast"; I still mean several hours.

    Leave a comment:


  • cboustred
    replied
    It 'worked' lightening fast for me too, except when I looked at the resulting BAM files none of the reads were aligned properly

    Try running samtools flagstat to check the number of mapped reads

    Leave a comment:


  • TabeaK
    replied
    Uhm, by the way, I have started running the latest bwa on my Macbook (Mac OSX 10.7.4; Lion) yesterday.

    Runs fine - the first round of paired end alignment is complete, the program ran right through and processed my 60million odd reads.

    The only issues I encountered were with bwa having problems to infer the insert size, but I suspect that is due to either a problem with my fastq files or my ineptitude at selecting the right settings.

    The program itself works and is lightning-fast even on my crappy machine!

    Edit: I actually had problems with directing bwa to the file directories. No idea why, but even though the path to the files WAS DEFINITELY right, bwa failed to open the files. So, I have copied everything to my home directory and run from there --> no more problems.
    Last edited by TabeaK; 11-09-2012, 02:08 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • cboustred
    replied
    I am also having the same problem running the current bwa release (0.6.2) on Mac OSX Moutain Lion (10.8.2). All indexes were made on the Mac using bwa.

    Using the older version of bwa (0.5.9) everything works fine

    Leave a comment:


  • quincymo
    replied
    Thanks for your replies.

    My Mac OS version is Mac OS X Lion 10.7.5.

    Leave a comment:


  • GenoMax
    replied
    Originally posted by quincymo View Post
    It failed for all the files I tested. But bwa 0.5.9 worked fine on the same files.
    Perhaps someone else on the forum can chime in (do not have a Mac handy to test now) if they are successfully using bwa (v.0.6.2) on OS X. Please indicate exact OS X version.

    Leave a comment:


  • quincymo
    replied
    It failed for all the files I tested. But bwa 0.5.9 worked fine on the same files.

    Leave a comment:


  • GenoMax
    replied
    Originally posted by quincymo View Post
    I think it looks OK.

    2.9G genome.fa
    8.0K genome.fa.amb
    4.0K genome.fa.ann
    2.9G genome.fa.bwt
    738M genome.fa.pac
    1.4G genome.fa.sa
    8.0G total
    That looks good.

    Is the alignment failing for all files or just one file?

    Leave a comment:


  • quincymo
    replied
    bwa 0.5.9 works fine on my Mac, but 0.6.x do not work.

    Leave a comment:


  • quincymo
    replied
    I think it looks OK.

    2.9G genome.fa
    8.0K genome.fa.amb
    4.0K genome.fa.ann
    2.9G genome.fa.bwt
    738M genome.fa.pac
    1.4G genome.fa.sa
    8.0G total

    Leave a comment:


  • GenoMax
    replied
    Originally posted by quincymo View Post
    I did build the index on Mac
    bwa index -a bwtsw genome.fa
    which produced the following files:
    genome.fa.ann genome.fa.pac genome.fa.amb genome.fa.bwt genome.fa.sa
    File sizes for the index files look ok?
    e.g. .sa file should be about 1.5G and .bwt 2.9G.

    Leave a comment:


  • quincymo
    replied
    I did build the index on Mac
    bwa index -a bwtsw genome.fa
    which produced the following files:
    genome.fa.ann genome.fa.pac genome.fa.amb genome.fa.bwt genome.fa.sa

    bwa failed to calculate SA coordinate. Note it only took 0.75 sec.

    Software/bwa-0.6.2/bwa aln Genome/Homo_sapiens/UCSC/hg19/Sequence/BWAIndex/version0.6.2/genome.fa ERR001014_1.fastq > ERR001014_1.sai
    [bwa_aln] 17bp reads: max_diff = 2
    [bwa_aln] 38bp reads: max_diff = 3
    [bwa_aln] 64bp reads: max_diff = 4
    [bwa_aln] 93bp reads: max_diff = 5
    [bwa_aln] 124bp reads: max_diff = 6
    [bwa_aln] 157bp reads: max_diff = 7
    [bwa_aln] 190bp reads: max_diff = 8
    [bwa_aln] 225bp reads: max_diff = 9
    [bwa_aln_core] calculate SA coordinate... 0.75 sec
    [bwa_aln_core] write to the disk... 0.02 sec
    [bwa_aln_core] 250000 sequences have been processed.
    [main] Version: 0.6.2-r126
    [main] CMD:Software/bwa-0.6.2/bwa aln Genome/Homo_sapiens/UCSC/hg19/Sequence/BWAIndex/version0.6.2/genome.fa ERR001014_1.fastq
    [main] Real time: 1.118 sec; CPU: 1.114 sec

    Leave a comment:

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • SEQadmin2
    Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
    by SEQadmin2



    Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

    Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
    ...
    10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 09:57 AM
0 responses
20 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 09:51 AM
0 responses
11 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
0 responses
67 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
0 responses
47 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...