Header Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

HTS Mappers!

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse

SEQanswers June Challenge Has Begun!

The competition has begun! We're giving away a $50 Amazon gift card to the member who answers the most questions on our site during the month. We want to encourage our community members to share their knowledge and help each other out by answering questions related to sequencing technologies, genomics, and bioinformatics. The competition is open to all members of the site, and the winner will be announced at the beginning of July. Best of luck!

For a list of the official rules, visit (https://www.seqanswers.com/forum/sit...wledge-and-win)
See more
See less
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • HTS Mappers!

    Anyone vounteer to update the wiki ;-)




    Motivation: A ubiquitous and fundamental step in high-throughput sequencing analysis is the alignment (mapping) of the generated reads to a reference sequence. To accomplish this task numerous software tools have been proposed. Determining the mappers that are most suitable for a specific application is not trivial.

    Results: This survey focuses on classifying mappers through a wide number of characteristics. The goal is to allow practitioners to compare the mappers more easily and find those that are most suitable for their specific problem.

    Availability: A regularly updated compendium of mappers can be found at http://wwwdev.ebi.ac.uk/fg/hts_mappe...g/hts_mappers/.

    Contact: [email protected]
    Homepage: Dan Bolser
    MetaBase the database of biological databases.

  • #2
    A comparison of accuracy would have been nice...

    Comment


    • #3
      I was thinking to organize a 'mapathon' on the wiki.... how would you recommend benchmarking accuracy?
      Homepage: Dan Bolser
      MetaBase the database of biological databases.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by dan View Post
        I was thinking to organize a 'mapathon' on the wiki.... how would you recommend benchmarking accuracy?
        That would be AWESOME! I think we should query SEQanswers folks and vote on a number of metrics... this would be fun group project...

        Comment


        • #5
          Cool! It shouldn't be too hard either, but we need to have clear guidelines about what to measure and how, so that results are comparable across mappers. The only other thing we need is a dataset and a place to host it...
          Homepage: Dan Bolser
          MetaBase the database of biological databases.

          Comment


          • #6
            I'd recommend using % reads mapped and the # of reads mapped uniquely as part of the evaluation, and keep in mind that the # of known heterozygotes is a measure of sensitivity, NOT accuracy. My two cents.

            Comment


            • #7
              Should we generate data so we have a 'gold standard'? Or just work with metrics based on consistency, speed, and coverage?
              Homepage: Dan Bolser
              MetaBase the database of biological databases.

              Comment


              • #8
                Are you talking about simulated or real?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Simulated reads from real genomes.

                  We could simulate a range of 'noise' across a series of error models and produce reads characteristic of a variety of technologies... there must be software to do this already right?
                  Homepage: Dan Bolser
                  MetaBase the database of biological databases.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    There is and we have these datasets already. I would be happy to share. We did a number of tests with this dataset for a manuscript we are sending out.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Fabulous! Please link to the datasets, and I'll try to put wheels in motion via the wiki :-)
                      Homepage: Dan Bolser
                      MetaBase the database of biological databases.

                      Comment

                      Latest Articles

                      Collapse

                      ad_right_rmr

                      Collapse

                      News

                      Collapse

                      Topics Statistics Last Post
                      Started by seqadmin, Yesterday, 07:14 AM
                      0 responses
                      6 views
                      0 likes
                      Last Post seqadmin  
                      Started by seqadmin, 06-06-2023, 01:08 PM
                      0 responses
                      6 views
                      0 likes
                      Last Post seqadmin  
                      Started by seqadmin, 06-01-2023, 08:56 PM
                      0 responses
                      164 views
                      0 likes
                      Last Post seqadmin  
                      Started by seqadmin, 06-01-2023, 07:33 AM
                      0 responses
                      298 views
                      0 likes
                      Last Post seqadmin  
                      Working...
                      X