Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Lien
    Member
    • Dec 2009
    • 47

    #1

    Cuffdiff p- and q-value of zero

    Hi all,

    I've just performed my first RNA-seq analysis on 2 conditions with 3 replicates each. We followed the Tophat-Cufflinks-Cummerbund protocol as described in the Trapnell paper (Nature protocol 2012).
    When I filter my list of differentially expressed genes using the parameters q-value < 0.001 and log2 fold change > plus of minus 2, I end up with a list of 703 differentially expressed genes. However, of these, I find that 324 genes have a p-value and a q-value of zero. Could anyone explain me how you end up with a value of zero?
    I didn't include the genes that are not expressed at all in any of the 2 conditions (FPKM of zero), so that is not the cause of a zero q-value.

    Any thoughts would be appreciated!
    I include some examples below:

    gene_id gene_short_name locus sample_1 sample_2 status value_1 value_2 log2_fold_change test_stat p_value q_value significant
    XLOC_014955 ACSS1 20:24986872-25039616 C4_5_6 C10_11_12 OK 0.0351045 6.08325 7.43704 -9.95201 0 0 yes
    XLOC_015108 BMP7 20:55743808-55841707 C4_5_6 C10_11_12 OK 0.0266919 5.32807 7.64107 -8.59536 0 0 yes
    XLOC_023650 STOM 9:124101352-124132545 C4_5_6 C10_11_12 OK 0.0353902 7.89868 7.80212 -8.53728 0 0 yes
    XLOC_017798 GUCY1B3 4:156680125-156728783 C4_5_6 C10_11_12 OK 0.0379018 10.7677 8.15023 -10.0701 0 0 yes
    XLOC_020293 KCNK5 6:39156746-39197251 C4_5_6 C10_11_12 OK 0.28591 3.36844 3.55845 -11.9519 0 0 yes
    XLOC_000544 EPHX4 1:92495532-92529093 C4_5_6 C10_11_12 OK 0.401335 4.86434 3.59937 -8.75222 0 0 yes
    XLOC_012801 ZNF702P 19:53471503-53496784 C4_5_6 C10_11_12 OK 5.56173 1.25631 -2.14634 12.7103 0 0 yes
    XLOC_012861 ZNF667 19:56950692-56988770 C4_5_6 C10_11_12 OK 3.83043 0.87479 -2.1305 9.37418 0 0 yes
    XLOC_024898 RPS4Y1 Y:2709622-2734997 C4_5_6 C10_11_12 OK 356.118 0.337537 -10.0431 16.7393 0 0 yes
    XLOC_024921 USP9Y Y:14813159-14972768 C4_5_6 C10_11_12 OK 24.2597 0.0245576 -9.94817 16.6818 0 0 yes

    Cheers,
    Lien
  • jmwhitha
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2013
    • 107

    #2
    I have the opposite problem; my p and q-values are 1 and so instead of getting many significant calls, I am getting genes that have a log 2 fold change of over 12 not being called significant. Do you know how to fix this?

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • kinpict.com
      Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
      by kinpict.com
      The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
      Today, 06:37 PM
    • SEQadmin2
      16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
      by SEQadmin2





      NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
      10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
    0 responses
    26 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
    0 responses
    35 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
    2 responses
    55 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post kinpict.com  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
    0 responses
    175 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...