Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sp24
    Member
    • May 2013
    • 14

    #1

    Makeblastdb from paired end reads

    Hello everyone. I’m in the process of analyzing some transcriptome data. I’m not quantifying expression at all. I only want to search for sequences based on a query file of my genes of interest. I have paired end reads, so I’m not using a fully assembled transcriptome. Basically, I need some advice since I’m new to this area.

    What I have done so far is merge the R1/R2 files and convert the files from Fastq to Fasta using the FastX-toolkit. I used the makeblastdb command to make the blast database from the resulting Fasta file. I know that I’m supposed to get .nhr .nin and .nsq, but I think that the database is so big that I got something like this:
    DB.00.nsq, DB.00.nin, DB.00.nhr
    DB.01.nsq, DB.01.nin, DB.01.nhr
    and so on.
    So here’s the first question: is this a problem? Or will I just have to blast my query file against each database (00, 01), one at a time?

    Also, before I get too far into this, I also would like to know if for some reason I shouldn’t be merging the read files and creating a database from it.

    Thank you for taking the time to read this!
  • maubp
    Peter (Biopython etc)
    • Jul 2009
    • 1544

    #2
    Originally posted by sp24 View Post
    I know that I’m supposed to get .nhr .nin and .nsq, but I think that the database is so big that I got something like this:
    DB.00.nsq, DB.00.nin, DB.00.nhr
    DB.01.nsq, DB.01.nin, DB.01.nhr
    and so on.
    So here’s the first question: is this a problem? Or will I just have to blast my query file against each database (00, 01), one at a time?
    No that's normal for a very large database - have a look at the NCBI provided NR or NT databases as an example.
    Originally posted by sp24 View Post
    Also, before I get too far into this, I also would like to know if for some reason I shouldn’t be merging the read files and creating a database from it.
    That is a very sensible question - you might get something out of your planned analysis but this is not the normal approach (I would do a transcriptome assembly giving you putative transcripts, attempt to analyse them, for example with BLAST against sister species).

    Comment

    • sp24
      Member
      • May 2013
      • 14

      #3
      Thanks for your response. I decided not to merge the R1/R2 files since I've been reading on here that the R2 file needs to be reverse complemented. I've been creating blast databases with individual read files and blasting against my query, but now I'm trying to figure out how to interpret the outputs.

      For the scope of this project I'm not going to be able to assemble transcriptomes, just trying to figure out how to retrieve these sequences. If someone reads this and has done this before, I would appreciate your input. Or if there's any papers/online resources you can point me to that would be great as well.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
        by SEQadmin2



        Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

        Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
        ...
        10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
        by SEQadmin2


        Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

        We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
        ...
        09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:13 AM
      0 responses
      21 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:48 AM
      0 responses
      18 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
      0 responses
      36 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
      0 responses
      42 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...