Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • AndreaIzq
    Junior Member
    • Jun 2013
    • 5

    Get coverage value in given regions

    Hello,
    I am trying to get the normalized coverage value in some given regions (bed file) but I don't succeded. Is there any easy way to do so? I am quite new in bioinformatics, sorry for asking basic questions.

    Thanks in advance,

    Andrea
  • Heisman
    Senior Member
    • Dec 2010
    • 534

    #2
    What do you mean by normalized? Do you want the raw coverage counts for different samples and then to just divide by the total number of reads? Do you want coverage of every base in a region or just the average coverage within a region? What commands have you tried to achieve this?

    Comment

    • AndreaIzq
      Junior Member
      • Jun 2013
      • 5

      #3
      Thanks Heisman for your reply.
      What I exactly want is to plot the average coverage of my proteins in several regions (bed file). In the y axis, the average coverage and in the x axis, the width of this regions.
      I want to know if there is a direct relationship between the width of that regions and the coverage of my proteins. I don't know what normalized procedure to use to be able to compare the coverage of my proteins.

      Thanks again,
      Andrea

      Comment

      • Heisman
        Senior Member
        • Dec 2010
        • 534

        #4
        Is this an RNA-seq experiment? Have you heard the term "RPKM", and do you feel that would be appropriate regarding normalization?

        I haven't worked with RNA-seq data myself so maybe someone else will chime in with a tool that can do what you want without issues.

        Without incorporating any normalizing, though, if you just wanted to compute average coverage for a series of regions, I believe the easiest way to do it is described here: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!to...ss/WSNEVuHIpz0

        Which shows a variant of this command:

        coverageBed -abam ALIGNED_FILE.bam -b REGIONS.bed -d | groupBy -c 5 -o mean

        Comment

        • AndreaIzq
          Junior Member
          • Jun 2013
          • 5

          #5
          That's a ChIP-Seq experiment. I wil try to do it with the average coverage as you suggested, if the results are not correct I will try RPKM then.

          Thanks.

          Comment

          • Heisman
            Senior Member
            • Dec 2010
            • 534

            #6
            I have not done ChIP-seq so I may be missing something but the only thing that jumps out as obvious for normalization purposes is the number mapped reads for each sample. Good luck.

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • GATTACAT
              Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by GATTACAT
              Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
              07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by SEQadmin2


              I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

              Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
              06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
            0 responses
            23 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
            0 responses
            23 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
            0 responses
            23 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
            0 responses
            55 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...