Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • akshaya.ramesh
    Member
    • Apr 2013
    • 22

    using the Smith Waterman algorithm for blastn

    Hello,

    I have been working on some genome assembly and have just begun annotation of my the contigs. I am using blastn in blast+(ncbiv2.2.28) to help identify orthologous genes. I recently read a paper that soft filtering with SW algorithm were the most efficient in the identification of orthologous segments. I was wondering if there was anyway I could run blastn with the SW algorithm instead of X-drop algorithm? I am aware of the use_sw_tback parameter for blastp, but I would like to run my contigs through blastn and was wondering had any suggestions?

    Any help/insights would be appreciated.

    Thanks in advance.
    Best,
    Akshaya
  • lh3
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 686

    #2
    Try ssearch from the fasta package. I do not know what's "soft filtering", though.

    Comment

    • rhinoceros
      Senior Member
      • Apr 2013
      • 372

      #3
      If your ref genome is close enough, I'd say '-task megablast' will do the job just fine. As far as I know, there's no way to use SW with blastn..
      savetherhino.org

      Comment

      • akshaya.ramesh
        Member
        • Apr 2013
        • 22

        #4
        Thank you for both your suggestions. This is very helpful.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
          by SEQadmin2



          Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

          There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
          Yesterday, 05:17 AM
        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:08 AM
        0 responses
        6 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
        0 responses
        8 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        31 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
        0 responses
        29 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...