Tweet
Does anyone know what the function of defline starting with '+' in a fastq format file really is except providing some descriptive information? If it does not have any function in downstream analysis, does it mean that we can ignore this line (if we do not care the descriptive information)? I think people can save some space by minimizing the defline.
-
-
It's pretty common to just replace that with a single "+" for the reasons you mentioned. -
It's a delimiter between the sequence and quality lines. Trust me if you've dealt with enough Fasta like formats over the years that people have mutilated in various text editors (or worse, word processors), you need something more definitive than a linebreak to tell the difference.
There is no requirement for them to match the metadata in the @ line.Comment
-
That is a minority view. The FASTQ format such as it is requires the '+' line to match the '@' or be left blank. Many parsers will reject it otherwise.Originally posted by Bukowski View Post
Comment
-
All the HiSeq data I get has no metadata in that line. Is that the default for HiSeqs? In which case it might be a majority viewOriginally posted by maubp View PostThat is a minority view. The FASTQ format such as it is requires the '+' line to match the '@' or be left blank. Many parsers will reject it otherwise.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp1137
Comment
-
Likewise, at the least it's a very rapidly increasing minority!Originally posted by Bukowski View PostAll the HiSeq data I get has no metadata in that line. Is that the default for HiSeqs? In which case it might be a majority viewComment
-
Leaving the '+' line blank ought be the norm by now - the disk space saving alone is a compelling argument.
(If my earlier comment was unclear, I'm saying conflicting '@' and '+' lines is non-standard and a bad idea)Comment
-
Ah, that wasn't what I parsed from your comment, thanks for the clarification! And in fact it was my initial comment that was unclear, I should have stated that it could be left blank, not that they shouln' t match. My bad.Originally posted by maubp View PostComment
-
Ah, fair enough!Comment
-
The field of epigenetics has traditionally concentrated more on DNA and how changes like methylation and phosphorylation of histones impact gene expression and regulation. However, our increased understanding of RNA modifications and their importance in cellular processes has led to a rise in epitranscriptomics research. “Epitranscriptomics brings together the concepts of epigenetics and gene expression,” explained Adrien Leger, PhD, Principal Research Scientist...04-22-2024, 07:01 AM -
Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...04-04-2024, 04:25 PM
Comment