Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dpryan
    replied
    If he hasn't written one yet or posted a link to one written by someone else, then there's probably not been one written for gsnap's output (looking at the format, it'd be a pain to write one).

    Leave a comment:


  • fongchun
    replied
    Right. That's why I was wondering if there were alternatives to Picard mark duplicates that can handle these chimeric read formats.

    I know that Thomas Wu, Gsnap author, said he was working on a package that could handle it, but I don't think it has been made public unfortunately...

    Leave a comment:


  • dpryan
    replied
    Well, picard can mark the duplicates, it just can't handle the chimeric read format of gsnap. So, you have some decisions to make...

    Leave a comment:


  • fongchun
    replied
    That's interesting. I've also read that it "depends" on your biological question especially if you are looking for SNVs. I would think that it is important to "mark" them and not necessarily remove them so that you can specify to the tool ahead of time how to handle it.

    You are right in that a lot of tools break (including Picard). So it would seem that there is no way to mark duplicates in RNA-seq?

    Leave a comment:


  • dpryan
    replied
    It's typically not necessary to remove duplicates in RNAseq. With highly expressed genes, one would expect these.

    BTW, a lot of tools will break when fed chimeric reads. More so since the SAM spec was only recently updated to include them and most mappers don't yet follow the spec.

    Leave a comment:


  • fongchun
    started a topic Alternatives to Picard Mark Duplicates

    Alternatives to Picard Mark Duplicates

    Hi,

    Does anyone know any alternatives to Picard mark duplicates that is capable of handling split-reads in RNA-seq data?

    I have a gsnap bam file that has been aligned and a read that it split is represented on two different lines (as indicates by a 'XT' flag. This ends up throwing an error when using Picard mark duplicates:

    Exception in thread "main" net.sf.picard.PicardException: Value was put into PairInfoMap more than once. 6: test:M00569:47:000000000-A50YA:1:1107:13835:21068

    The culprit lines in the bam file:

    Code:
    M00569:47:000000000-A50YA:1:1107:13835:21068    65      chr2    133036616       39      32H119M chr7    99156283        0       CTGCGGTTCCTCTCGTACTGAGCAGGATTACCATGGCAACAACACATCATCAGTAGGGTAAAACTAACCTGTCTCACGACGGTCTAAACCCAGCTCACGTTCCCTATTAGTGGGTGAAC      GHGFEEEEFFFHEHG2EGHGGCAD3FAGFDFGGFFEG3GFHHFFFHHGGHFHHFHFFF?3FGGGHFHHFHFDGFFHHFGGGGGFGGFFHFGGEHGHHGAGHHBHGHHHFGHF0GEDHHF      RG:Z:HEKRCOR1_clone1    MD:Z:T3CA8A1G17T11CATCAC1G23T3A6T9A1G18 NH:i:1  HI:i:1  NM:i:18 XW:i:6  XV:i:12 SM:i:39 XQ:i:40 X2:i:0  XS:A:-  XT:Z:GT-AG,0.87,0.98
    
    M00569:47:000000000-A50YA:1:1107:13835:21068    81      chr4    76807259        39      119H32M chr7    99156283        0       GTTCAGACATTTGGTGTATGTGCTTGGCTGAG        GFFFD6GFDAGGGGGGFFGG4AAF?FFBBBBB     RG:Z:HEKRCOR1_clone1    MD:Z:11C17A2    NH:i:1  HI:i:1  NM:i:2  XW:i:0  XV:i:2  SM:i:39 XQ:i:40 X2:i:0  XS:A:+  XT:Z:GT-AG,0.87,0.98
    
    M00569:47:000000000-A50YA:1:1107:13835:21068    129     chr7    99156283        38      119M32S chr2    133036616       0       CGTCGCCGGCAGTGCCACCGAGAAGCGCCGGCCTCGGGGCTGCCTACAGCGGCCCGGGAGAGGCTGTGGTGGGCCCGCGCGCGCGTGCGTAGGTGACAGGACACCGGCCGGGCCCGCCCTGGATAACTGGCTTGGGGCGGCCAAGCGTTCC      A?AAADAD10>>GGBBBF0EC0A/F1/AA/AEE/0E//>>/>/>1B0BBF@EG/E@/</</?/B/00BBFFC//?<////<---<-<.;E.-.<0CC00...9..;9-A-;@->--;@---AFF/B////;B---;@-@----99----9-      RG:Z:HEKRCOR1_clone1    MD:Z:9A32T29C4A5A3T15G5A9       NH:i:1  HI:i:1  NM:i:8  XW:i:8  XV:i:0  SM:i:38      XQ:i:40 X2:i:0  PG:Z:T

    How do you typically handle duplicates in RNA-seq? Do you just use samtools rmdup?

    Thanks,

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • seqadmin
    New Genomics Tools and Methods Shared at AGBT 2025
    by seqadmin


    This year’s Advances in Genome Biology and Technology (AGBT) General Meeting commemorated the 25th anniversary of the event at its original venue on Marco Island, Florida. While this year’s event didn’t include high-profile musical performances, the industry announcements and cutting-edge research still drew the attention of leading scientists.

    The Headliner
    The biggest announcement was Roche stepping back into the sequencing platform market. In the years since...
    03-03-2025, 01:39 PM
  • seqadmin
    Investigating the Gut Microbiome Through Diet and Spatial Biology
    by seqadmin




    The human gut contains trillions of microorganisms that impact digestion, immune functions, and overall health1. Despite major breakthroughs, we’re only beginning to understand the full extent of the microbiome’s influence on health and disease. Advances in next-generation sequencing and spatial biology have opened new windows into this complex environment, yet many questions remain. This article highlights two recent studies exploring how diet influences microbial...
    02-24-2025, 06:31 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by seqadmin, 03-03-2025, 01:15 PM
0 responses
179 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 02-28-2025, 12:58 PM
0 responses
272 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 02-24-2025, 02:48 PM
0 responses
656 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 02-21-2025, 02:46 PM
0 responses
267 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Working...
X