Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • sindrle
    replied
    What if time had the same effect on both groups?
    Or if groups are the same, but both changed in time.

    Could you then do as I said?
    Last edited by sindrle; 10-24-2013, 03:28 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Simon Anders
    replied
    Originally posted by sindrle View Post
    But am I correct to use "status_Healthy_vs_Diabetic" to look for differences between the groups (disregarding time), and vise versa for "timepoints_2_vs_1"?
    For those genes for which the interaction is not significant: Yes.

    For the others: not quite because you cannot disregard time because the difference depends on the time point.

    If you want to average over the two time points, you can add half of the interaction effect to the status main effect (or, vice versa, add half of the interaction to the time-point main effect to get the average over disease states).

    Leave a comment:


  • sindrle
    replied
    So to compare Cuffdiff2 with DESeq2 I could run that design (since I have already done that on Cuffdiff 2), but as you said its not my actual question of interest, thus leading me to DEseq2 in the first place.

    Leave a comment:


  • dpryan
    replied
    Code:
    Treat <- factor(paste(sampleTable$status,sampleTable$timepoints,sep=""));
    design <- formula(~ 0 + Treat)
    Will create 4 groups: "Diabetic1", "Diabetic2", "Normal1", and "Normal2". So no, that won't keep the pairing. This is a similar design to what cuffdiff would do if you input the files as 4 groups. Aside from the pairing issue, some people prefer this since it's easier to directly compare groups, which is what they want to do. It's mostly a matter of the question you really want to ask.

    Leave a comment:


  • sindrle
    replied
    Thanks!
    That what I thought, but is that the only thing tested?

    I get alot of results, of which I have chosen three:

    statusResults <- results(dds, "status_Healthy_vs_Diabetic");
    timepointsResults <- results(dds, "timepoints_2_vs_1");
    statusTreatmentResults <- results(dds, "timepoints2.statusHealthy");

    So you described the "timepoints2.statusHealthy" result, right?

    But am I correct to use "status_Healthy_vs_Diabetic" to look for differences between the groups (disregarding time), and vise versa for "timepoints_2_vs_1"?

    Thanks!

    Leave a comment:


  • Simon Anders
    replied
    With the "~ patient + ...", you get paired tests. You currently test for interaction between time and status, i.e., you will get gene for which the amount of change between the time points differs significantly between healthy and diabetic subjects.

    Leave a comment:


  • sindrle
    replied
    So you mean I dont have paried test as I have wrote it?

    Leave a comment:


  • jingerlu
    replied
    I suppose this could get the pair combination you like :
    Treat <- factor(paste(sampleTable$status,sampleTable$timepoints,sep=""));
    design <- formula(~ 0 + Treat)

    but I am not sure if the following DESeq() or nbinomWaldTest() or nbionomLRT() function can work with this design formula . I am so temped to switch to edgeR , which has nicer tutorial and examples to follow.

    Leave a comment:


  • sindrle
    replied
    The answer is, thanks to dpryan:

    status <- factor(c(rep("Healthy",26), rep("Diabetic",22)), levels=c("Healthy", "Diabetic"));
    timepoints = as.factor(c(1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2));
    patients <- factor(c(04,21,53,55,61,62,67,73,76,77,79,04,21,53,55,61,62,67,73,76,77,79, 01,08,13,70,71,72,75,81,82,83,86,87,88,01,08,13,70,71,72,75,81,82,83,86,87,88));
    sampleTable <- data.frame(sampleName = sampleFiles, fileName = sampleFiles, status=status, timepoints=timepoints, patients=patients);

    and

    des <- formula(~patients + timepoints*status);
    Last edited by sindrle; 10-20-2013, 02:22 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • jingerlu
    replied
    what colData(ddsHTSeq) gives ?

    Leave a comment:


  • sindrle
    started a topic DESeq2: Multi-factor designs

    DESeq2: Multi-factor designs

    With great help from dpryan I have come a long way, but now Im stuck again. I need to be able to calculated both within and between samples. I have two groups at two time points, the data is paired within samples, but not between:

    sampleFiles <- list.files(path="/Volumes/timemachine/HTseq_DEseq2",pattern="*.txt");
    status <- factor(c(rep("Healthy",26), rep("Diabetic",22)))
    timepoints = as.factor(c(1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2));
    sampleTable <- data.frame(sampleName = sampleFiles, fileName = sampleFiles, status=status, timepoints=timepoints);
    directory <- c("/Volumes/timemachine/HTseq_DEseq2/");
    des <- formula(~timepoints+status);
    ddsHTSeq <- DESeqDataSetFromHTSeqCount(sampleTable = sampleTable, directory = directory, design=des);
    ddsHTSeq

    These commands all work, but they are incorrect due to not taken the paired data in account.
    So I looked here: page 49; http://www.bioconductor.org/packages...usersguide.pdf

    So I tried instead;

    Treat <- factor(paste(sampleTable$status,sampleTable$timepoints,sep=""));
    design <- model.matrix(~0+Treat);
    colnames(design) <- levels(Treat);

    > design
    Diabetic1 Diabetic2 Healthy1 Healthy2
    1 0 0 1 0
    2 0 0 1 0
    3 0 0 1 0
    4 0 0 1 0
    5 0 0 1 0
    6 0 0 1 0
    7 0 0 1 0
    8 0 0 1 0
    9 0 0 1 0
    10 0 0 1 0
    11 0 0 1 0
    12 0 0 1 0
    13 0 0 1 0
    14 0 0 0 1
    15 0 0 0 1
    16 0 0 0 1
    17 0 0 0 1
    18 0 0 0 1
    19 0 0 0 1
    20 0 0 0 1
    21 0 0 0 1
    22 0 0 0 1
    23 0 0 0 1
    24 0 0 0 1
    25 0 0 0 1
    26 0 0 0 1
    27 1 0 0 0
    28 1 0 0 0
    29 1 0 0 0
    30 1 0 0 0
    31 1 0 0 0
    32 1 0 0 0
    33 1 0 0 0
    34 1 0 0 0
    35 1 0 0 0
    36 1 0 0 0
    37 1 0 0 0
    38 0 1 0 0
    39 0 1 0 0
    40 0 1 0 0
    41 0 1 0 0
    42 0 1 0 0
    43 0 1 0 0
    44 0 1 0 0
    45 0 1 0 0
    46 0 1 0 0
    47 0 1 0 0
    48 0 1 0 0
    attr(,"assign")
    [1] 1 1 1 1
    attr(,"contrasts")
    attr(,"contrasts")$Treat
    [1] "contr.treatment"

    However my "old" design, the "des", looks like this:

    > des
    ~timepoints + status

    Running with "new" design:
    ddsHTSeq <- DESeqDataSetFromHTSeqCount(sampleTable = sampleTable, directory = directory, design=design)

    Gives error:

    Error in formula.default(design) : invalid formula

    Not to suprising.. But Im stuck, what to do? Am I totally of?

    Thanks!
    Last edited by sindrle; 10-18-2013, 10:02 AM.

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • seqadmin
    Essential Discoveries and Tools in Epitranscriptomics
    by seqadmin




    The field of epigenetics has traditionally concentrated more on DNA and how changes like methylation and phosphorylation of histones impact gene expression and regulation. However, our increased understanding of RNA modifications and their importance in cellular processes has led to a rise in epitranscriptomics research. “Epitranscriptomics brings together the concepts of epigenetics and gene expression,” explained Adrien Leger, PhD, Principal Research Scientist...
    04-22-2024, 07:01 AM
  • seqadmin
    Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
    by seqadmin


    Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
    04-04-2024, 04:25 PM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by seqadmin, Yesterday, 08:47 AM
0 responses
12 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
0 responses
60 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
0 responses
59 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
0 responses
54 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Working...
X